PMP Preparation (PrePMP) by Dr.Behrangi(PMP-PMI)®
رفتن به کانال در Telegram
1 385
مشترکین
اطلاعاتی وجود ندارد24 ساعت
+27 روز
+630 روز
در حال بارگذاری داده‌ها
کانال‌های مشابه
ابر برچسب‌ها
اشارات ورودی و خروجی
---
---
---
---
---
---
جذب مشترکین
نوامبر '26نوامبر '26
نوامبر '26
+6
در 0 کانال‌ها
اکتبر '26
+28
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '26
+28
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اوت '26
+37
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '26
+31
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئن '26
+43
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مه '26
+39
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
آوریل '26
+30
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مارس '26
+37
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
فوریه '26
+35
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژانویه '26
+23
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
دسامبر '25
+48
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
نوامبر '25
+29
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اکتبر '25
+32
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '25
+38
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اوت '25
+47
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '25
+44
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئن '25
+41
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مه '25
+49
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
آوریل '25
+43
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مارس '25
+41
در 1 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
فوریه '25
+43
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژانویه '25
+88
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
دسامبر '24
+63
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
نوامبر '24
+83
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اکتبر '24
+91
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '24
+43
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اوت '24
+28
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '24
+28
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئن '24
+18
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مه '24
+10
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
آوریل '24
+15
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مارس '24
+25
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
فوریه '24
+19
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژانویه '24
+21
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
دسامبر '23
+17
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
نوامبر '23
+8
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اکتبر '23
+16
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '23
+14
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اوت '23
+16
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '23
+30
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئن '23
+27
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مه '23
+20
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
آوریل '23
+13
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مارس '23
+19
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
فوریه '23
+14
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژانویه '23
+11
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
دسامبر '22
+17
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
نوامبر '22
+16
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اکتبر '22
+25
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '22
+22
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اوت '22
+13
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '22
+14
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژوئن '22
+14
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مه '22
+18
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
آوریل '22
+33
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
مارس '22
+19
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
فوریه '22
+6
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
ژانویه '22
+20
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
دسامبر '21
+27
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
نوامبر '21
+57
در 0 کانال‌ها
Get PRO
اکتبر '21
+210
در 0 کانال‌ها
| تاریخ | رشد مشترکین | اشارات | کانال‌ها | |
| 07 نوامبر | 0 | |||
| 06 نوامبر | 0 | |||
| 05 نوامبر | +1 | |||
| 04 نوامبر | +1 | |||
| 03 نوامبر | +2 | |||
| 02 نوامبر | 0 | |||
| 01 نوامبر | +2 |
پست‌های کانال
| 2 | D. Complete the formally required written acceptance documentation now before finalizing contract closure.
The key issue is contractual compliance. The email may support that acceptance happened in practice, but it does not replace the contract’s required acceptance method unless the contract explicitly allows it. Reopening the deliverable from scratch is unnecessary if the work was already accepted; the correct action is to formalize and document that acceptance properly before closeout. | 275 |
| 3 |  What's the answer | 258 |
| 4 | At minimum, the written acceptance form should be backed by evidence that shows both what was accepted and why it was considered acceptable.
That usually includes the original email trail that documented the informal acceptance, the specific deliverable version or transmittal that was accepted, and objective proof that the deliverable met the contract requirements, such as inspection results, test results, review comments, sign-off records, or acceptance criteria checklists. If scope or requirements changed along the way, include the approved change records so the acceptance matches the final contracted scope.
For closure, the file should also show that there are no unresolved contractual loose ends. That typically means documenting any remaining punch-list items, claims, disputes, warranties, guarantees, payment status, and the final contract closeout record.
The safest standard is: the acceptance package should let an auditor reconstruct the story clearly—what was delivered, when it was reviewed, who accepted it, under what authority, against which criteria, and what supporting records justify that acceptance. | 235 |
| 5 | What evidence should accompany the written acceptance form? | 184 |
| 6 | B. Analyze impact across both delivery approaches before deciding the path forward.
In a hybrid project, the first step is to assess the change holistically. Because the request affects both the predictive hardware component and the adaptive software component, the project manager should evaluate cross-impact on scope, schedule, cost, risk, dependencies, and governance before routing it through formal change control for the predictive side and backlog prioritization for the adaptive side.
A is too rigid, C skips impact analysis, and D is not always required first because approval authority depends on the project’s change governance thresholds. | 311 |
| 7 | Excellent | 271 |
| 8 | B option is correct for do first. | 273 |
| 9 | A project manager is leading a hybrid transformation project. The hardware component follows a predictive approach, while the customer-facing software is delivered adaptively. Midway through execution, a major stakeholder requests a new reporting feature that affects both components. What should the project manager do first?
A. Reject the request because scope baseline was already approved
B. Analyze impact across both delivery approaches before deciding the path forward
C. Add the feature to the agile backlog and proceed immediately
D. Escalate to the sponsor because hybrid projects require executive approval for all changes | 257 |
| 10 | What secondary impacts should follow baseline analysis?
After baseline analysis, assess the secondary ripple effects in this order:
- Risk: Determine whether the change creates new risks, changes the probability or impact of existing risks, or affects contingency and response plans.
- Resources: Check whether you need different skills, more people, more equipment, or reallocation that could disrupt other work.
- Quality: Confirm whether acceptance criteria, testing effort, standards, or defect risk change.
- Procurement and contracts: Review whether vendor scope, purchase orders, statements of work, delivery dates, or contractual terms are affected.
- Stakeholders and communications: Assess whether expectations, approvals, reporting, training, or engagement plans need to change.
A practical exam rule is: baseline impacts first; integrated ripple effects second. If the change alters one baseline, assume it may also affect these areas before any approval or implementation. | 286 |
| 11 | What impacts should be analyzed first?
First, analyze the impact on the project baselines:
Scope, schedule, and cost come first because those are the primary controlled baselines a change request may alter.
Confirm exactly what deliverable, requirement, milestone, budget line, or work package would change.
Right after that, assess the ripple effects on risk, resources, quality, procurement, and stakeholder expectations. A scope change often drives schedule movement, cost change, added resource needs, and new risks, so the analysis should stay integrated rather than treating each area separately.
In exam terms, the best first step is: assess the effect on baselines through formal integrated change control before any approval or implementation. | 204 |
| 12 | A and C
The project manager should use the formal change control process to evaluate the request and document it while assessing its impact on the project baselines. Immediate approval or implementation before analysis would bypass proper integrated change control. | 166 |
| 13 | 👍 | 160 |
| 14 | 👍 | 161 |
| 15 | A and C options are correct. | 167 |
| 16 | A and C | 189 |
| 17 | A project manager receives a change request during project execution that may affect scope, cost, and schedule. What should the project manager do next?
*Select two answers.*
A. Evaluate the impact of the change request through the formal change control process
B. Approve the change immediately to satisfy the stakeholder
C. Document the request and assess its effect on baselines
D. Ignore the request until the next phase gate
E. Ask the team to implement the change before analysis | 206 |
| 18 | ### Summary of the Poster:
- Title: The Concept of "Power" in the Three Main Pillars of Development
- Subtitle: From the Perspective of Björn Hettne
- Definition Box:
Power is the ability to influence what decisions are made in society, who gets a share, what rules govern, and in which direction society moves.
The issue of development is not "who holds power", but rather "how power is organized among the state, market, and society, and how it is transformed into accountable institutions and developmental capacity".
- Three Pillars:
- STATE (Blue) – Center of Political and Institutional Power
- MARKET (Green) – Center of Economic Power and Capital
- SOCIETY (Orange) – Center of Civic Power and Advocacy
- Key Message at the bottom:
Power is useful when it is organized and transformed into accountable institutions and developmental capacity.
- Compiler: Compiled by: Dr. Behrangi | PMP-PMI® | 219 |
| 19 |  Photo from Teach | 179 |
| 20 | B. Escalate the request through the defined governance and change control structure for evaluation.
A major scope change with possible impact on benefits, budget, and compliance should go through formal governance and integrated change control first. Executive seniority does not bypass that process. | 252 |
