PLR | Supreme Court e@journal | Supreme Court online | SC online | Law | Legal

Join for Selected reports from Supreme Court eJournal and Punjab Law Reporter. https://chat.whatsapp.com/HGbJspKrtbj4RIKWMlPjcr

*CONTEMPT* | Court deems it fit and appropriate to issue a show cause notice upon the *Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Chandigarh*, for the latter making an explanation to this Court as to why proceedings for contempt be not initiated against him for his making the above miscommunication, which but is prima facie completely ridden with lies. *[PLRonline.in]* ....... https://supremecourtonline.in/court-deems-it-fit-and-appropriate-to-issue-a-show-cause-notice-upon-the-presiding-officer-drt-2-chandigarh-for-the-latter-making-an-explanation-to-this-court-as-to-why-proceeding/ *Punjab Law Reporter* | Call 9463598502 *Join* : https://chat.whatsapp.com/IW2g8ANNmO22zpPv7YPEPv

Just save this group to use for *FREE* - LIMITATION CALCULATOR by clicking on this link : https://supremecourtonline.in/limitation-calculator/

*The LAW DIARIES* Channel. Follow us : https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaLo0Vt8aKvR8U945L1D

Hindu Succession Act S. 6, 8 – Coparcenary property – Once the property had been acquired by way of succession, it would lose its ancestral character . (2023-4)212 PLR 596] https://supremecourtonline.in/hindu-succession-act-s-6-8-coparcenary-property-once-the-property-had-been-acquired-by-way-of-succession-it-would-lose-its-ancestral-character-2023-4212-plr-596/

PLRONLINE | *CPC S. 153A - enables the court which has passed the decree to exercise the power of correcting clerical and typographical mistake even though the appeal preferred has been dismissed in limine - Such provisions does not oust the jurisdiction of the appellate court to correct typographical or clerical mistakes*https://supremecourtonline.in/court-dismissed-appeal-in-limine-with-words-no-merit-dismissed-dismissal-of-appeal-in-limine-would-amount-to-merger-plronline-id-1214701/

[SC] Service Law – Constitution of India, Art.136 – Post of BSF Sub-Inspector (GD) – Regular promotion criteria cannot be applied with regard to medical fitness in selection through LDCE [PLRonline 468685] https://supremecourtonline.in/sc-service-law-constitution-of-india-art-136-post-of-bsf-sub-inspector-gd-regular-promotion-criteria-cannot-be-applied-with-regard-to-medical-fitness-in-selection-th/

[SC] CPC O. 8 R 6A – Counter claim – Must be instituted before the defendant has delivered his defence or before the time limit for delivering his defence has expired. [PLRonline] https://supremecourtonline.in/sc-cpc-o-8-r-6a-counter-claim-must-be-instituted-before-the-defendant-has-delivered-his-defence-or-before-the-time-limit-for-delivering-his-defence-has-expired-2022-plronline-0600/ *JOIN HERE* : https://chat.whatsapp.com/HGbJspKrtbj4RIKWMlPjcr

*PLRONLINE* | Non-signing by the attesting witnesses over the agreement - Would not invalidate the contract . https://sites.google.com/plronline.in/plronline/s/specific-performance/agreement-to-sell-does-not-require-any-marginal-witnesses *JOIN* : https://chat.whatsapp.com/HGbJspKrtbj4RIKWMlPjcr

Punjab Rent Act – Leave to defend – Limitation – Tenant shall have to apply for leave to contest within 15 days of effecting service on him and no application shall thereafter be entertained. [(2023-4)212 PLR 381, PLRonline 492683] https://supremecourtonline.in/punjab-rent-act-1995-13-of-2012-section-24-1c-leave-to-defend-limitation-tenant-shall-have-to-apply-for-leave-to-contest-within-15-days-of-effecting-service-on-him-and-no-applica/

MVA S. 166 – Dependency of Brothers and Sisters – Without specific evidence of dependency, adult siblings, who are married and living independently, are not presumed to be dependents of the deceased. [PLRonline 496605] https://supremecourtonline.in/mva-s-166-dependency-of-brothers-and-sisters-without-specific-evidence-of-dependency-adult-siblings-who-are-married-and-living-independently-are-not-presumed-to-be-dependents-of-the-deceased/

Acquittal - Complainant / Father was the sole eyewitness - He had neither seen anyone killing his son nor he had deposed that he had seen anyone burning the victim - Therefore, he is not actually an eyewitness either to the killing or to the burning of the deceased, though he may be an eyewitness to the incident which took place prior wherein a car had chased their motorcycle, pushed them towards the roadside making them fall in the bushes, thereupon assaulting the deceased and then taking................https://sites.google.com/plronline.in/plronline/plronline-in/23/12/sc-ipc-s-302-302-acquittal-father-was-sole-eyewitness

https://supremecourtonline.in/service-matter-salary-gratuity-not-paid-liable-to-pay-interest-on-the-same-for-the-delayed-period-2023-plronline-0126/ Service matter – Salary – Gratuity – Not paid – Liable to pay interest on the same for the delayed period. [2023 PLRonline 0126]

*Tender - Blacklisting of firm - petitioner has been denied a reasonable opportunity to put-forth his case against the proposed black listing of the Petitioner in clear violation of principles of natural justice. [2023 PLRonline 0124 (Tel.)]* Read HERE : https://supremecourtonline.in/tender-blacklisting-of-firm-fundamentals-of-fair-play-requires-the-person-concerned-should-be-given-an-opportunity-to-represent-his-case-before-he-is-put-on-the-black-list-2023-plronline-0124/ Subscribe: https://supremecourtonline.in/membership-account/membership-levels/

[SC] plronline.in | Order 9 Rule 13, Section 96(2) - Ex-parte Decree: A defendant has three options for contesting an ex-parte decree: https://sites.google.com/plronline.in/plronline/cpc/o-9/cpc-order-9-rule-13-ex-parte-decree-a-defendant-has-three

https://supremecourtonline.in/crpc-s-82-83-and-174-action-against-witnesses-who-do-not-appear-inspite-of-notices-directions-issued-by-ph-high-court-in-2022-plronline-0597-to-all-ds-judges-dgp-set-aside-2023-4-plr/ CrPC S. 82, 83, and 174 – Action Against Witnesses who do not appear inspite of notices – Directions issued by P&H High Court in 2022 PLRonline 0597 to all D&S Judges/ DGP, set aside. [ (2023-4) PLR 291 (SC)]

Insurance – Pre-medical check-up – Mediclaim policy – Pre existing disease – Non-disclosure – Insurer did not get the medical check up done. Insurer liable . Punjab Law Reporter read here : https://sites.google.com/plronline.in/plronline/i/insurance/mediclaim-policy-non-disclosure

https://supremecourtonline.in/sc-st-act-for-offence-to-be-constituted-there-must-be-an-allegation-that-the-accused-not-being-a-member-of-scheduled-caste-or-scheduled-tribe-committed-an-offence-under-the-ipc-punishable-for-a-ter/ SC/ST Act – For offence to be constituted, there must be an allegation that the accused not being a member of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe committed an offence under the IPC punishable for a term of 10 years or more against a member of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe knowing that such person belongs to such `community’. [PLRonline #497684]