Aether Force

OK, whew.... No for some Steinmetz. I have not dug too deep into Steinmetiz literature but here it is. He was an electrical genius, even surpassing Tesla in application. Our modern world stands on this man's efforts. Along with Heaviside, his work is a major backbone to the theories of Eric Dollard, who will be highlighted in some posts soon enough.

The presumed magnetic “lines of force” are ether wake-fronts, both 2-dimensionally circular and extrapolatively curvilinear (to the mass). These endless wake fronts are the genesis of magnitude which begins measure of same, so conceptualized as time.” ”The secret of high power magnets which have smaller spatial magnetic field, which is contrary to simplex human logic is that Gaussian flux ratings of magnets (50 and higher, or realistically 38 and higher) is directly relational to higher dielectric energy. The so-called magnetization in the creation of a magnet is a ramping up of dielectric potential which inversely shrinks the spatial field and footprint of the magnetic field perturbation TORUS which surrounds the magnet-object. This is likewise the same secret behind the creation and nature of a so-called “black hole” whose very nature is a coherent mass so huge that its dielectric counterspatial potential has utterly overthrown the (or its) magnetic, which is the only support for a body to have a Cartesian magnitude in the existential cosmos.” MAGNETISM - FORCE & MOTION, Space, Discharge, Centrifugal, Divergence MAGNETISM - 1. Centrifugal (centripetal on return - polarization) 2. Circular 3.Radiative 4. Spatial Lichtenburg patterns - fractal energy dissipation …. lightning is discharge into counterspace FIELDS - Aether pertubation modalities … not spiritual, conceptual, material, or rational - Everything is fields “All 4 field modalities (gravitational, magnetic, electrical and di-electrical fields) interact with each other.. ALWAYS. "Matter" is di-electric condensate - simplified said. Everything is in specific resonance and harmony, so.. if you understand "the music" and the "field geometries" of nature.. you can do what you want ..pretty much. If you additionally understand the "creation" and "elimination" of "space", how fields "create" space - then space-travel will be understood.” "Field-Modalities" as in projective field geometry, field-pressure mediation, Charge - Discharge, Spacial and Counterspacial behaviour, Centrifugal and Centripetal behaviour, Divergent and Convergent behaviour, Capacitance (Permeability), Resistance (Permittivity), Creation of Polarity-Effects and the Creation and Origin of Spin .. are important...to understand the PRINCIPLES of existence.” A.S. on Ken Wheeler PARTICLES “There are no discrete particles in the universe and certainly none that mediate charges, discharges, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, and radiation, only fields, all modalities of the Ether. The so-called ‘electrons’ are not particles, not objects or subjects but are the dynamic principle of discharge, and are certainly not charge-carriers, fields are not particles, are not “electrons”, nor assuredly are there energy discharges in the vacuum of space involving ‘electrons’; the ‘electron’ is a fiction of fallacious observation and an even more faulty mental acuity, spawned naturally from the minds of materialists, or an Atomist. Electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization; magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, is the radiative termination of electrical discharge” - Ken Wheeler HARD LIGHT - Above gamma 30-100ev ---- Hard light --- quasi stable particle. All matter is compounded Hydrogen. - light is not particle but if powerful it can become quasi particle - smaller the space the higher the capacitance - gyromagnetic precession emits trillions of tons of hydrogen - hard light is like black hole ... near non frequency - electron cloud --- charged cloud …. centrifugal impetus emitted from counterpatial - No such things as a wave ... wave is what something does - No dualities in nature

Some notes on Ken Wheeler AETHER (not to be confused with ether, IMO, which I can distinguish later this weekend) - Aether is not substantial - If it was made of anything it would not be aether - Something that is made out of something would be compounded and temporal - Aether is not temporal - Aether is the original definition of inertia - being pure un-manifest energy - Aether has no cartesian reality EXPLOSIONS - Explosions are the impotency of release of energy - Energy" is the expression (the MEASURE in EFFECT) of fields at action in their modalities; such as gravitational, electrical and magnetical field-MODALITIES. The fundamental and primal field nevertheless is the Di-electric field - the di-electric inertia (what was called "Aether" in the past and Higgs-Liquid today in QM). In their interactions (field-modalities) we have 4 principles in mother nature: Force and Motion and Inertia and Acceleration. The SOURCE of ALL "energy" most importantly (hence the continuation, or the reason of any existence state such as "entity" or "particle") is the counterspatial collapse of fields and the spatial radiation of fields (as cycle or/and in a "loop"). Now - listen carefully - as space is posterior to fields - meaning what shadow is to light, is "space" to fields (no fields = no space) and "after-effect" - the creation and elimination of "space" therefore is the source of all energy ever MEASURED IN EFFECT. I hope this makes it clear, what "space" is and what the CAUSE of "energy" is. - A.S. on Ken Wheeler (AS was a big Ken Wheeler fan/interpreter I met a few years ago but has since vanished) LIGHT His views on light on interesting. - Light is a sound wave in the aether as he quotes Tesla. Sound and light are not emissions. Light is a coaxial compound aether perturbation modality. - Light when measured is the helical aether perturbation with a rate of propagation based on the hysteresis of the aether. - Light is a coaxial circuit - a transverse electromagnetic rarefaction and compression along the vector of transmission - Speed of Light is the hysteresis of the Aether … how fast it can “wrinkle” or be perturbed. It’s a rate of induction. - Hysteresis changes with the medium as light passes through it. SCALAR - as if you were to “roll up’ (his wording) the rarefactions and compressions inbetween the electric and magnetic … measured in volts/s and is instantaneous "DIELECTRICITY" - is the aether under stress or strain - non-cartesian hyperbolic geometry which is the inverse of the toroidal dynamics of magnetic fields Dielectricity/ electrostatics dissipate into counterspace DIELECTRICITY - INTERTIA, ACCELERATION, Counterspace, Charge, Centripetal, Convergence DIELECTRICITY - 1. Centripetal 2. Radial 3.Inertial 4. Counterspatial Electricity is a compound of Dielectric and Magnetic Fields. Magnetic Field is just a centrifugal, divergent toroidal motion. All is the dielectric field. Gravity is mutual attraction to a null center point. MAGNETISM - gives magnitude, mass, and volume to the temporal world through toroidal motion aka the Larmor frequency and gyromagnetic precession - Magnetism is the 3D force vector which defines the loss of energy ”So-called “lines of force” pertaining to magnetism is a gross perceptually-based error and absurdity. It has absolutely no reality whatsoever. Said “lines” are only the peaks and troughs of the conjugate magneto-dielectric system which are mutually both manifest and anti-manifest as they interplay against each other towards both (the creation of) space and counterspace. The “lines of force” is a nonsense concept and came from Faraday in viewing iron filings above a magnet. The lines are due to constructive and destructive pressure mediation between divergence and convergence of the magneto-dielectric, namely the re-integrating dielectric. There are no lines, and force is qualified as the action of one thing upon another.

Thoughts on Ken Wheeler In short, Ken Wheeler is a self appointed guru who claims to be the only person with the facts on magentism while he has appropriated his knowledge from others. He was not the first person to come up with Phi based distribution of magnetism. Jon Depew did that years ago with his coral castle code. Here is my collection of his images and a few videos. Sadly he does not have any publicly available literature. Ken’s videos could honestly each be 3 minutes long if you took out the constant repeating, overly elaborate language, and constant self-boasting. His views on the ferrocell seem to be very inaccurate as showing the geometry of the magnetic field. You might want to review this article by Jason Verbelli. I don't agree with a lot of Jason's recent work but he gives some good insight onto the ferrocell phenomena. https://steemit.com/science/@verbz/ken-wheeler-s-ferrocell-videos-confused-observations-and-misleading-terminology?fbclid=IwAR3ieCLqbqxw86iSBQfokVKTlCxG5uTlAYqeoxrt_Dbqb2BP_83LL8q1xq0 His metaphysics is an utter joke. I am not Buddhist scholar and have little interests most schools of Buddhism (Tibetan interests me a bit though). For instance his saying that the anode cathode polarity explains ghosts was one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard him say. He tends to use very elaborate definitions to explain everything when a simple term he has defined many times could be used. In terms of his model, he does seem to make some decent sense out of Walter Russell’s work on vortex dynamics, electricity, and light. And seems to coincide with a little bit of Joseph Cater’s work as well in terms of magneto-dielectrics. I am not a Tesla pusher these days. Even though he was a genius and his work is worth studying, I do not think his tech is what we need nor would it be possible to implement wide-scale these days. He uses the term dielectricity which seemed to have originated with Dollard, instead of saying the di-electric field. Which most likely was the electro-static field. But the question is whether the original term actual meant static or dynamic? He uses the term counterspace as a synonym with the dielectric field. He mocks Steiner many times but THAT IS WHERE THE TERM ORIGINATED. He makes the absurd claim that Steiner is nothing but witch-craft. Seriously !!!! Steiner was ahead of his time and surpassed anything uttered out of Wheeler yapper.

However, if a system is constant, the result is constant (aside from those threshold frequencies that can appear as different forms due to their location near other resonant bands). 99Hz appears as an 8-fold geometry in a 24.25mm-diameter cup of water, no matter what (see Sheldrake’s graph). The image posted here shows how an 18.4Hz sine wave signal appears in a 2-inch diameter cup of fluid that is a lab-certified blood mimicking fluid (it has all the same acoustical properties of blood but made with nontoxic materials). If I change the fluid, or change the cup diameter, this 18.4Hz sine wave signal will appear differently (if it generates a standing wave at all). The colors are from LED lights arranged in rings about 8-inches above the fluid, controlled by my Halo Light controller. Thanks for reading, and I sure hope you learned something! If so, please share so more can benefit from this understanding! For myself, knowing that any frequency can produce any shape is pretty fascinating. It teaches me to pay more careful attention to the relationship between elements of a phenomenon rather than to any particular characteristic of the individual elements. This speaks to the phenomenon known as "emergence". The image shown here is of a 18.4Hz sine wave oscillating a 2" dish of blood mimicking fluid."" http://www.waterjournal.org/uploads/vol9/sheldrake/WATER.2017.10.Sheldrake.pdf

Some remark by Casey Atterbury on some fallacies of cymatics that I alluded to in my intro on the topic: Some truth bombs about Cymatics (in reference to 432 hertz) and repeatability of patterns. Here is a post from Casey Attebery (Mr. E-Scholar) - https://www.facebook.com/groups/276508939647674/user/27701218/ “This is what 432Hz looks like!” "No, untrue, false, full stop. There is *no* specific image for 432Hz. There is *no* image for *any* frequency. By altering the cup diameter and the fluid properties just right, we can make any frequency resonate the fluid into any desired geometry, within bounds of physical limits of the system of course. That is, if I wanted to make 27Hz (sine wave) appear as a five-fold geometric standing wave, it is possible to build a cup with the right diameter and fill it with the right fluid to make a 27Hz sine wave resonate the fluid into a 5-fold standing wave. There is nothing special about the way a frequency appears other than that is the way that frequency may appear in that fluid in that cup. Sometimes, it can even be that an individual frequency manifests as different geometries (and may even morph between them), because that frequency is on the threshold of various “bands of resonance” for the cup/fluid system. Please analyze Figure 12 of http://www.waterjournal.org/uploads/vol9/sheldrake/WATER.2017.10.Sheldrake.pdf .... It is attached below for your ease of viewing, and shows the geometric results of frequencies from 50Hz to 200Hz *as they appear in the medium cell they used, a cup 24.25mm in diameter*. Further, draw your attention to frequencies like 82Hz, 95Hz, 109Hz, 118Hz, 127Hz, 146Hz, 170Hz, 187Hz, which can “pop” between various geometries since they are on the threshold of various resonance bands for that particular cup and fluid system. If we change the diameter of this cup, or change the properties of the fluid within the cup, this chart of resonance bands alters completely! The space and the medium filling the space determines how energy will interact with that system. Sometimes, that energy can manifest differently even in the same system! But, it is absolutely a fact of resonance science that a frequency can appear as any desired geometric form, depending on the cup diameter and fluid used in the experiment. Please pardon me if I am being repetitious; I am seeing a lot of misinformation being shared about cymatics and the way a frequency looks, and I feel it necessary to clear up the misconceptions. Specifically, there is no credit to the image of the 432Hz hydroglyph appearing more coherent than the 440Hz hydroglyph. If they changed the diameter of their cup slightly smaller, or made their fluid slightly more viscous, they would have created a system where the 440Hz hydroglyph would appear more coherent than the 432Hz glyph. I know we all have experienced this basic fact of resonance. If you hum a certain tone in an empty room you may find that it resonates and echoes better than another tone. That tone then is said to be resonant to the dimensions of that room with the specific air filling the room. Make the room more humid, or change to a smaller room, and that tone you hummed will no longer ring the room up to resonance. This is the same with liquid cymatics. If we change the space or change the medium in the space we change the way energy interacts with that space. Just because a guitar string of a certain length sounds the way it does, doesn’t mean everything of that length will make that sound when we “pluck” it. Again, this is the same situation - if we change the system, we change the bands of resonance for that system and thus we change the way frequencies appear in that system.

Cymatics literature that is in the above icedrive collection:

Here is my cymatics collection that needs a little updating but still has loads of goodies: https://icedrive.net/s/fuVGXkBRf965BAPW2R6vYxfS8NRN