Mudflood Research, Tartaria, True Aryan History

The Yezidis in Iraq are an ancient Indo-Aryan ethnic group, often called the “blonde blood line”. They are infamous for their religion of "Yezidism", for which they have been the subject of genocide and slavery by Muslim invaders. The Yezidis know their god as SATAN (Shaitan), however due to centuries of Muslim persecution they are forbidden to speak this name out of fear, they refer to Satan under numerous names such as "Melek Tawus" and "Ankar". They are forbidden to share knowledge with outsiders and most practice occurs in secret, though some of their beliefs are found in the Al-Jilwah, also known as the Black Book of Satan. They state that they migrated many centuries ago from Northern India into the Near East, and were part of ancient civilizations. Much like the Slavo-Aryan calendar, the Yezidi calendar is over seven thousand years old and they follow the old Pagan ways. They also worship the Sun God whom they call Shamash, also known as Dazhbog to the Slavs, the Greek Apollo, or Azazel in the Bible.

RELIGION is a PROGRAM Created for the Enslavement of Humanity 卐 RA 卍 means primordial light. Light - Is static electromagnetic field, electroatom, basis of universe, and RA is the name of Old World Aryan science. It's not a ReLIEgon. ALL churches, synagogues, cathedrals, mosques, were STOLEN by the enemy invaders, and they were NEVER used to pray to any of their alien "gods". These structures do not belong to them, they were built by our ancestors thousands of years ago for electrical generation, until they were stolen by enemies. Our ancestors (you in old bodies) never used to pray nor submit to anyone. ALL religious sacral structures from Jerusalem wall to every old church and cathedral in Europe have had corpses, lymph nodes, blood, organs, oils, incense, narcotics, mixed inside of the building materials, to drive you crazy, to fake you a spiritual "holy" experience, a simulated high. Our past has been systematically destroyed by Judeo-Islamo-Christianity, how much more will they to keep the lie going?

RELIGION is a PROGRAM Created for the Enslavement of Humanity 卐 RA 卍 means primordial light. Light - Is static electromagnetic field, electroatom, basis of universe, and RA is the name of Old World Aryan science. It's not a ReLIEgon. ALL churches, synagogues, cathedrals, mosques, were STOLEN by the enemy invaders, and they were NEVER used to pray to any of their alien "gods". These structures do not belong to them, they were built by our ancestors thousands of years ago for electrical generation, until they were stolen by enemies. Our ancestors (you in old bodies) never used to pray nor submit to anyone. ALL religious sacral structures from Jerusalem wall to every old church and cathedral in Europe have had corpses, lymph nodes, blood, organs, oils, incense, narcotics, mixed inside of the building materials, to drive you crazy, to fake you a spiritual "holy" experience, a simulated high. Our past has been systematically destroyed by Judeo-Islamo-Christianity, how much more will they to keep the lie going?

Lastly, what I find most ironic is that the author of this channel, Thuletide, a Pagan, favours the version of history created by the Vatican, which has been completely unfavourable towards Aryans in general. The entirety of modern history is the work of just a handful of Jesuit priests between the 17th and 19th centuries, who speak absolute lies regarding out ancestors. The core tenant of the church is that our ancestors were some primitive degenerate subhuman savages living in mudhuts, then we were "enlightened" by a Jewish religion which civilized us - this is one of the most blasphemous claims one can make against our ancestors. Christianity has stolen credit for creating civilization in Europe, claiming that they created all of the cathedrals and architecture, when in reality it was stolen from us Aryans who understood high technology and atmospheric power generation. They want to steal Aryan ingenuity and attribute it to the Jewish religion. This is what parasites do.

Is Tartaria an "Anti-White" Psyop? (Original Post Here) The author of this channel, Thuletide, claims that Tartaria must be an "anti-White psyop" because of his very poor and misinformed understanding of what the theory is, which he summarizes as "White people couldn't have possibly built neo-classical architecture in the 1800s because of the lower technology, therefore European ingenuity is attributed to a global civilization" (Not his belief, but how he wrongly interprets the theory). Furthermore he draws a parallel between Tartaria, and the WEF proposed New World Order, a global empire that maintains peace, with free food and energy, which he then concludes that this theory is used to promote such New World Order. Let's explore this argument. Before I proceed I must warn this information may be perceived as offensive to non-Aryan readers, but this is simply the truth and must not be taken in any harsh way. On first glance it seems as if there is no racial element to this theory - which is simply not the case after further investigation. TARTARIA was the largest country to ever exist until it was annihilated by the Roman Empire in the 19th century. It was the empire of Aryans, which stretched from South America, through India to Europe, covering an area of tens of millions of square kilometers. In order to coverup the existence of this empire, Jesuit historians, namely Joseph Scaliger, have falsely documented this Empire under several different names, stretching them over 5 different millennia, some examples include, The Golden Horde, Babylonians, Huns, Egyptians, Scythia, and even Proto Indo Europeans or the "Aryans" of the Hindu Vedas. From extensive research it can only be concluded that all of these Empires, which we are told existed between five to one thousand years ago, all in fact existed at the same time and were one unified Empire which in the middle ages was known as "Tartaria". This was a country founded by Aryans thousands of years ago who migrated southwards into Asia following a cataclysm after having landed on Earth in the North Pole, which was a continent known to them as "Da'Aria" on ancient Rus-Sanskrit language, by other cultures it was known under several other names such as "Hyperborea" by the Greeks, "Thule" by the Germanics, "Shambhala" by the Tibetans, among many more. Sometime in the 17th century this continent was wiped off the maps, not new maps were being forged which maliciously neglected to include this land. These Aryans colonized the entire planet, establishing a global empire. That's why all around the world all of the indigenous non-white cultures have old legends about white gods, Aryans that came to them and showed them how to build cities, and shared knowledge with them, such as the Mayan God Votan, known by the same name as the Germanics, a traveler God who is the most wise. That's why ancient rulers everywhere were tall, fair skinned, and mostly blond, blue eyes. You can find them among the ruling class of ancient India, China, Persia, Armenia, Sumeria, Egypt, and other non-white cultures. Then there the Chachapoya of Peru the tall white race (Peru was named after Perun). All of the gods, goddesses, great rulers, heroes and warriors of Ancient Greece are specifically described as white skin, blonde hair, blue eyes. So to claim that this theory is in any way anti-white, is just as ludicrous as claiming that the history of Western Colonialism in the 15th-19th centuries is, which on the surface appears to be the same narrative, until one realizes that Western Colonialism was really Rothschild-Jesuit expansionism, under the guise of European imperialism, not led by Europeans, but by the (((Bible people))), in a campaign to take over colonized lands of Tartaria.

The Greater Tatary / Tatarian Empire psyop is one of the most perniciously anti-White things I've come across in a while. It attributes European achievements to an ancient proto-NWO civilization called the "Tatarian Empire" and uses European colonial architecture as proof that this "Tartarian Empire" was global. The psyop claims that White people couldn't possibly have built neo-classical architecture in the 1800s (because they still used horses and carts, or something) and uses examples of early industrial development as proof that the "Tartarian Empire" was technologically advanced. It also claims that the Globalists who have been tearing down European architecture and destroying our history for the last eight decades aren't doing it because they're anti-White, but because they are, for some reason, trying to cover up this mythical "Tatarian Empire." Video from: https://twitter.com/AndTartary/status/1585246615425536000

The Mongol Empire Was a Myth Invented In 1908 by a Mongol Nationalist Named Baavuday Tsend Gun (Part 2) And ultimately the biggest rebuttal is that, this so called Mongol Empire was according to historians was the BIGGEST on the planet, and supposedly brought forth such a scale of death and destruction that it lead to ecological change - today from them remains what? Mongolia is one of the least populated countries in Asia, eclipsed by both of it's neighbors hundreds of times over. So Where are all the foreign Mongol loanwords in Russian? The Mongolian language has dozens of Russian words for every one supposed Mongol word in Russian. Contrary to the claims of Fascist WW2 propaganda, there is in fact no evidence to support Mongolian genetics in Eastern Europeans, only the opposite of Mongols in fact being partly Russian, this can be attested not only through genetic study, but through the visual phenotype of many Mongolian people who often (though not necessarily commonly) resemble Europeans, even sometimes having blue or green eyes and lighter hair. If the Mongol Empire were real, then it was the ONLY one to not leave a single, linguistic, genetic, cultural, or archeological trace. The myth of the Mongol Empire is one of complete delusion from one delusional zealous nationalist named Baavuday Tsend Gun Lastly I would like to add that I write all of this without any hostility towards Mongolia or it's people and traditions. I am merely exposing the flaws of Jesuit history and the Scaligerian chronology. The word Mongol is not of Mongolian origin and was only recently introduced, the Mongols who live in modern day Mongolia have never called themselves such, but rather by their local ethnic names such as Oirats and Khalka. If you want to know who Genghis Khan really was (He was a White Russian), and the Real Mongol Empire (Tartaria), read these posts. The Mongol Empire was nothing more than a country called "Tartaria" by westerners. Tartaria was inhabited predominantly by Pagan Slavs, but also Turks Huns, Bulgars, Balts, Finns, Uralics, among hundreds of many other Pagan ethnic groups who had banded together to defend against the invaders. The real hostility here is against Slavic/Aryan people by the enemies who have been relentlessly destroying true history for the past millennia. Recorded history is only 1000 years old and the current year is 722. All of human history happened only recently in the middle ages. Everything you have been taught is a lie! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_History_of_the_Mongols

The Mongol Empire Was a Myth Invented In 1908 by a Mongol Nationalist Named Baavuday Tsend Gun (Part 1) The book "The Secret History of the Mongols" was a literary work allegedly written shortly after the year 1227 following the death of Genghis Khan, and is the basis for the history of the Mongol Empire and Genghis Khan, it has been widely passed off as fact by historians (namely those of the corrupt Romanov dynasty). Yet there is one very simple problem with this book - it was published in 1908 with not a single shred of evidence of it being any older, the sources Baavuday Tsend Gun cites in his book do not corroborate his story, in fact the sources he used do not seem to exist at all. It is claimed that "The Secret History of the Mongols" was rediscovered as an addendum originally inside another mysterious book called the "The Secret History of the Yuan dynasty" written in Chinese, however not a single copy of this book can be found. The source he cites is a non-existant book that nobody can read and nobody has ever seen before. Cross referencing sources is important in real research yet on close inspection Baavuday's book has only made up sources. How can a book written in 1908 accurately describe events in the 1200s without sources to earlier writings? There are NO other books on Genghis Khan's life written before the 1908 publishing of "The Secret History of the Mongols." Temujin or Genghis Khan is hardly mentioned in earlier Chinese manuscripts. Nothing is known of Temujin's life outside of that one book published in 1908. Yet historians consider this book by a 20th century Mongolian nationalist to be the ultimate authority on Genghis Khan's life. This is what our history is based on. One book written by one man in the 20th century. The original Chinese texts are nowhere to be found so it basically a fairy tale. It is not backed up by any hard evidence so by definition it is a work of fiction. But for the sake of argument let's assume "The Secret History of the Mongols" to be legitimate. We still run into several issues with mainstream chronological history: 1. Genghis Khan isn't even a proper name it just means "Great Khan" (Great King). 2. There is not a single period coin depicting the name Genghis Khan or Temujin. 3. The Mongol coins that do use the word "Khan" are in plural, referring to "Khans". 4. There are no statues of Genghis Khan older than 200 years. 5. There are no direct written accounts by Genghis Khan or his generals 6. Genghis Khan constructed no military fortifications and founded no cities. 7. There are no trade pacts or treaties with Genghis Khan. 8. No contemporary leader ever references a Genghis Khan. 9. There are no period maps of Genghis Khan's conquests. (only modern graphical approximations exist). 10. Genghis Khan has no real tomb. Only monuments that were constructed centuries later exist. 11. The battlements on the Great wall of China face the wrong direction. Rather than pointing North they face South. 12. When Marco Polo visited the court of Kublai Khan he was described as a white man living in a Western styled palace. The ruin of Kublai Khan's palace can be seen here https://i.imgur.com/PSLvdw4.jpg. This building was destroyed by Westerners in the second opium war, it resembles the exact style of "Western" "Tartarian" "Neoclassical" "Greek" architecture, megalithic in nature being constructed out of large stone, how was this accomplished by a nomadic horse-back people? 13. There are other books that describe a great "Khan" of the Moguls and his sons as men with blonde hair and blue eyes. Translators of the Golden book were pressured into inserting fictitious names (See here). Mogul is not to be confused with Mongolia.

There are fake accounts (possibly bots) claiming the identity of this channel. Channels cannot DM people, I would also have no reason to do so. The enemies are trying their hardest to subvert those in search of the truth. Mainly by using bots to promote false channels such as the Qanon ones. Anyone using the term "patriot" is a red flag, I also will almost never talk about low-level subjects (especially regarding US politics or Trump). Seeing as censorship on this platform is (mostly) difficult to do, the strategy of the enemies is instead to mainly lead truth-seekers astray by claiming benevolence and then lying (These same strategies are used on an astral level as well especially for reincarnation entrapment). Do not listen to them. Admin's account is @hrtkos

@admin. I have receive a message from fake profile with your name

The Krugolet Was the Original Calendar of the Old Vedic Aryans Russia was Christianized in the 18th century (occupied territory of Tartaria) by Peter the Great (Roman-Khazar criminal). In Summer 7207 on the Tartarian calendar (Krugolet), Peter (who spoke German and not Russian) proclaimed that the inhabitants were receiving a "Neuer Gott" (New God), God/Gott in Russian means "year", they were receiving new (((deity))) and a new calendar. He proclaimed that the Roman calendar was now in effect, and the current year was now 1700. The celebration of the new year changed from the Pagan September 1st, to January 1st, this added an extra 4 months to the chronology. Krugolet means "Cycle of Summers" on Slavic Sanskrit, and is believed to have counted 7530 summers since recreation of life on Earth (or some other cataclysmic event of mythological proportions). There were only three seasons - Autumn, Winter, and Spring, which formed the complete solar cycle called a Summer. http://krugolet-online.ru/

Christ was Executed 900 Years Ago/Romans in Russian Clothing When analyzing historical paintings we will discover many extreme inconsistencies. If history was not falsified recently, how do these people who lived closer to the past than we do today, not have a greater understanding of it? Full plate armour was a recent invention to the painters who lived in this time, why are they depicting it in an event 1500 years ago? That clothing style looks awfully European. Where's the arid landscape of Jerusalem? What I find most amusing are these depictions of a bearded Pontius Pilate dressed in medieval Russian clothing, particularly the Murmolka (fur hat), as well as the background people. I don't know about you, but if I were in the middle east I would not be wearing thick furs and steppe clothing. Perhaps these artists were not told the same version of history that we are today, during their lives it was probably taught that he was executed a mere 200-400 years ago, rather than 1500, and not in Jerusalem.

The Bible Was Created by 6 Corporations in the 1600s (Part 2) Reading this channel, you know that 1000+ years were added to our calendar. With that consideration in mind, and Paul and the evangelists living 500 years ago, how could any Bible such as the Codex Sinaiticus be as old as claimed? According to "A Child's History of England", the prisoners spoke an unknown language, presumably Greek. Maybe it's not a coincidence the King James Bible was written shortly after their pardon, after all they provided oral and or written documents which were translated into English for the first time ever. That is seemingly the case because in 1604, King James ordered the translation (or rather creation) of the English Bible by six companies; First Westminster Company: Genesis - Kings First Cambridge Company: Chronicles - Song of Solomon First Oxford Company: Isaiah - Malachi Second Oxford Company: Gospels - Acts of the Apostles & Revelation Second Westminster Company: Epistles Second Cambridge Company: Apocrypha

The Bible Was Created by 6 Corporations in the 1600s (Part 1) In the year 1851, famous English writer Charles Dickens published a book titled "A Child's History of England" which summarizes all of English history. Like all other books written in the midst of the reset, there are several contradictory claims to modern history, but one stands out in particular... According to the book, in England it was customary to pardon prisoners during the coronation of a Monarch. Five prisoners were pardoned in the Coronation of Queen Elizabeth I in 1559. These were the evangelists Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and also the Apostle Saint Paul, not 2000 years ago but less than 500! Don't believe me? Go read it for yourself on Chapter 31. If the Bible is to be attributed to those four men, how could it be remotely as old as we are told? What if it's not? How can history be generationally accumulated knowledge if it's so inconsistent? What if it's not? What if it's being written for the past 400 years?

The Bible Was Created by 6 Corporations in the 1600s (Part 1) Reading this channel, you know that 1000+ years were added to our calendar. With that consideration in mind, and Paul and the evangelists living 500 years ago, how could any Bible such as the Codex Sinaiticus be as old as claimed? According to "A Child's History of England", the prisoners spoke an unknown language, presumably Greek. Maybe it's not a coincidence the King James Bible was written shortly after their pardon, after all they provided oral and or written documents which were translated into English for the first time ever. That is seemingly the case because in 1604, King James ordered the translation (or rather creation) of the English Bible by six companies; First Westminster Company: Genesis - Kings First Cambridge Company: Chronicles - Song of Solomon First Oxford Company: Isaiah - Malachi Second Oxford Company: Gospels - Acts of the Apostles & Revelation Second Westminster Company: Epistles Second Cambridge Company: Apocrypha

Who was the Real Christ? He did not live 2000+ years ago. He was neither Jewish nor King of the Jews. He spoke neither Aramaic nor Hebrew. He was not executed in Jerusalem. He is not "Jesus" or "Yeshuah". He was not the "son of God", Yahweh. His name was Radomir. Everything you know about him was twisted and deformed by Jesuit historians in the last few centuries. He lived 900 years ago. He was a Rus'Aryan, on Slavic Sanskrit his name, Radost' Mira, means "Joy/Sunshine of the World". He spoke Russian. He was a mortal human like the rest of us, fighting the New World Order. For his crimes he was executed in Constantinople on Jewish holiday of Pesach, in 1086 (on the modern Jewish calendar), Summer 6594. Christ has NOTHING to do with Christianity, which was created by the controllers to enslave the masses. He was a Vedic Aryan missionary, his mission was to enlighten the Jews that their God Yahweh was the ENEMY. Only Judas Iscariot acknowledged his message, for that he was defamed by the Church.

All lessons on Russian history start with Prince Vladimir, the first Pagan king of Rus, under the pretext that the prior Pagan Slavs (Aryans) were a bunch of barbarian savages. But what if that's not the case; Prince Vladimir "Red Sun" was not Russian at all, but a Jew! His mother was a Jewess Malka, the daughter of a rabbi, also named Malk, from the city of Lyubich, which was a vassal of the Khazar Kaganate. Vladimir was merely the bastard child of Prince Svyatoslav, the last Pagan king of Rus'. Malka was his Khazar housekeeper slave who was drunkingly impregnated by him. The heir to of Rus' was Yaropolk, the son of Svyatoslav and his legal wife who was Slavic. But Vladimir murdered his half brother and usurped power. So the Jew became king and baptized Russia into a special form of Judaism for goyim, Christianity. Following forced baptism and genocide, the population of Rus' was reduced by a third. We abandoned the old Gods, and the Vedic truth, scientific and spiritual knowledge was destroyed.

All lessons on Russian history start with Prince Vladimir, the first Pagan king of Rus, under the pretext that the prior Pagan Slavs (Aryans) were a bunch of barbarian savages. But what if that's not the case; *Prince Vladimir "Red Sun" was not Russian at all, but a Jew!* His mother was a Jewess Malka, the daughter of a rabbi, also named Malk, from the city of Lyubich, which was a vassal of the Khazar Kaganate. Vladimir was merely the bastard child of Prince Svyatoslav, the last Pagan king of Rus'. Malka was his Khazar housekeeper slave who was drunkingly impregnated by him. The heir to of Rus' was Yaropolk, the son of Svyatoslav and his legal wife who was Slavic. But Vladimir murdered his half brother and usurped power. So the Jew became king and baptized Russia into a special form of Judaism for goyim, Christianity. Following forced baptism and genocide, the population of Rus' was reduced by a third. We abandoned the old Gods, and the Vedic truth, scientific and spiritual knowledge was destroyed.

Genghis Khan, presumably born in Summer 6670 (860 years ago), died in 6735, was undoubtedly of the Aryan race and not an Oriental "Asian" as we have been told. The modern depiction of him was only invented in the latter half of the 19th century, because even until this point many artists were still depicting him as he was described for ages, bearded, long red hair, and blue eyed (but sometimes green). (1) Here is a surviving Chinese drawing of the 13th-14th centuries, which depicts Genghis Khan during a falconry, he has blue eyes, a thick red beard and all the signs of a white man. (2) Coronation of Genghis Khan. Miniature from the "Flower of the stories of the lands of the East" (or "History of tartars") by Khayton (Hethum) (mid-1240s-1310s). (3) This is how the representatives of the Borjigin clan are described - this is the Mughal clan to which Timur-Genghis Khan belonged. Borjigin is translated as "blue-eyed". Rashid ad Din in his "Collection of Chronicles" also writes that Genghis Khan belonged to the Borjigin family, and had bright eyes. Here is another source from 1896, which describes the Borjigin family: “The Borjigins have eyes “blue-green ...” or “dark blue, where the pupil is surrounded by a brown rim” “Histoire de Mogols el des Tatares par Aboul Ghazi Bahadour Khan, publiee, traduite el annotee par Baron Demaison, SPb., 1874, vol. 11, p. 72, Cahun L. Introduclion a l'histoire de l'Asie, Paris, 1896, p. 201 "". (4) Genghis Khan on his deathbed. Engraving from "Universal Cosmography" by Sebastian Münster, Switzerland, 1588. (5) Genghis Khan is drinking with a bayazid. Undated engraving. (6)(7) More historical pre 19th century depictions of Genghis Khan, seems to be wearing medieval Russian-style clothing. Also, the historian Gumilyov in his book “Ancient Russia and the Great Steppe” describes the Mughals as follows: “The ancient Mongols were, according to the testimonies of the chroniclers and the finds of frescoes in Manchuria, a tall, bearded, fair-haired and blue-eyed people ...” (8)(9) It is not for nothing that on the maps of Europeans the place of modern Mongolia is still called: Great Mogolia of the Blondes, the territory where the Mughals originally lived is marked in red. (10) Another pre 19th century Genghis Khan depicted in a French engraving by Pierre-Duflos (Pierre-Duflos-1742-1816). (11) Duflo also painted not only Genghis Khan himself, but also his wife named (Hyu-Chen) Hee-Chen (or Purte Kuzhdin). Her appearance is yet again also Slavic/European. And although modern historians do not want to notice her, this wife of Genghis Khan is described in volume 4 of the encyclopedia The Modern Part of an Universal History: From the Earliest Account of Time, published in London in 1759 year, which is a collection of historical information: “Western Asian historians attribute the four sons of Genghis Khan to Hi-Chen (or Purte Kuzhdin), while Chinese historians call her the mother of only two of them. (The western Astatic historians ascribe the first four sons of Jenghiz Khan to Purta Kujin (or Hyu-chen); whereas the Chinese history makes her the mother of two of them). (12) Genghis Khan is also depicted in the book of Marco Polo, here is a miniature from this book "The Coronation of Genghis Khan". (13) In the same book by Marco Polo there is another miniature "Death of Genghis Khan". It is contained in the large volume "Le Livre des Merveilles" (Fr. 2810), kept in the French National Library [1264], v.2, p.527. (14) Dream of Genghis Khan. The white knight predicts his coronation, and here we see Genghis Khan is not at all a relative of the Chukchi! But a typical Slav, with a thick beard and all the signs of a white man. Well okay, you get the idea. I can show you 100 more historical depictions and eyewitness accounts of his appearance, but I am running out of space on this post.