Utah Freedom Coalition

🙄🧐🤔

Utah has SUPER close ties with the federal reserve https://archiveswest.orbiscascade.org/ark:80444/xv88424 and https://marriner.eccles.utah.edu/legacy/

Indeed https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1789394404446282213

PURE EVIL- https://x.com/MrWinMarshall/status/1789255903708881107

higher; and (2) in providing assistance to implement the strategy required under section 6907(a), should— (A) coordinate, through a whole-of-government approach, the efforts of relevant Federal departments and agencies to implement the strategy; (B) seek to fully utilize the unique capabilities of each relevant Federal department. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7900/text READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE https://x.com/onlythedeadknow/status/1788301280093388855

(1) pursuant to section 6302, close wildlife markets and prevent associated commercial trade in live wildlife, placing a priority focus on countries with significant markets for live wildlife for human consumption, high-volume commercial trade and associated markets, trade in and across urban centers, and trade for luxury consumption or where there is no dietary necessity— (A) through existing treaties, conventions, and agreements; (B) by amending existing protocols or agreements; (C) by pursuing new protocols; or (D) by other means of international coordination; (2) improve regulatory oversight and reduce commercial trade in live wildlife and eliminate practices identified to contribute to zoonotic spillover and emerging pathogens; Page 2,963 This one sounds like pushing civilization into things similar to “15 minute cities” under “One Health”. (7) increase efforts to prevent the degradation and fragmentation of forests and other intact ecosystems to minimize interactions between wildlife and human and livestock populations that could contribute to spillover events and zoonotic disease transmission, including by providing assistance or supporting policies to, for example— (A) conserve, protect, and restore the integrity of such ecosystems. VERBIAGE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A NEW COUNCIL WHICH BASED ON ALL GOALS AND DETAILS BEWLOW IT APPEARS TO BE THE NEW 2023 DOD BIODEFENSE COUNCIL PERHAPS THEY JUST CHANGED THE NAME TO MAKE IT SOUND BETTER? (17 AGENCIES UNDER 1 DOD UMBRELLA IS INTERESTING: Page 3,275 SEC. 6904. GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY AGENDA INTERAGENCY REVIEW COUNCIL. (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The President shall establish a Global Health Security Agenda Interagency Review Council (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Council’’) GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Council shall be responsible for the following activities: (1) Provide policy-level recommendations to participating agencies on Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) goals, objectives, and implementation, and other international efforts to strengthen pandemic preparedness and response. (2) Facilitate interagency, multi-sectoral engagement to carry out GHSA implementation. (3) Provide a forum for raising and working to resolve interagency disagreements concerning the GHSA, and other international efforts to strengthen pandemic preparedness and response. (4)(A) Review the progress toward and work to resolve challenges in achieving United States commitments under the GHSA, including commitments to assist other countries in achieving the GHSA targets. (d) PARTICIPATION.—The Council shall be headed by the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, in coordination with the heads of relevant Federal agencies. The Council shall consist of representatives from the following agencies: (1) The Department of State. (2) The Department of Defense. (3) The Department of Justice. (4) The Department of Agriculture. (5) The Department of Health and Human Services. (6) The Department of the Treasury. (7) The Department of Labor. (8) The Department of Homeland Security. (9) The Office of Management and Budget. (10) The Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (11) The United States Agency for International Development. (12) The Environmental Protection Agency. (13) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (14) The Office of Science and Technology Policy. (15) The National Institutes of Health. (16) The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. (17) Such other agencies as the Council determines to be appropriate. Page 3,281 SEC. 6906. SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of the Congress that, given the complex and multisectoral nature of global health threats to the United States, the President— (1) should consider appointing an individual with significant background and expertise in public health or emergency response management to the position of United States Coordinator for Global Health Security, as required by section 6905(a), who is an employee of the National Security Council at the level of Deputy Assistant to the President or higher;

SEC. 6302. COUNTRY-DRIVEN APPROACH TO END THE COMMERCIAL TRADE IN LIVE WILDLIFE AND ASSOCIATED WILDLIFE MARKETS. (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the completion of the first report required under section 6305, the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Secretary of Agriculture, and the Secretary of the Interior, and after consideration of the results of best available scientific findings of practices and behaviors occurring at the source of zoonoses spillover and spread, shall publicly release a list of countries the governments of which express willingness to end the domestic and international commercial trade in live wildlife and associated wildlife markets for human consumption, as defined for purposes of this title. Page 2,956 (A) end the domestic and international commercial trade in live wildlife and associated wildlife markets for human consumption immediately, during a transitional period, or aspirationally. SEC. 6303. SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that global institutions, including the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the World Organisation for Animal Health, the World Health Organization, and the United Nations Environment Programme, together with leading intergovernmental and nongovernmental organizations, veterinary and medical colleges, the Department of State, and the United States Agency for International Development, should— (1) promote the paradigm of One Health as an effective and integrated way to address the complexity of emerging disease threats; and (2) support improved community health, biodiversity conservation, forest conservation and management, sustainable agriculture, and the safety of livestock, domestic animals, and wildlife in developing countries, particularly in tropical landscapes where there is an elevated risk of zoonotic disease spill over. SEC. 6304. STATEMENT OF POLICY. It is the policy of the United States to— (1) support the availability of scalable and sustainable alternative sources of protein and nutrition for local communities, where appropriate, in order to minimize human reliance on the commercial trade in live wildlife for human consumption; (2) support foreign governments to— (A) reduce commercial trade in live wildlife for human consumption; (B) transition from the commercial trade in live wildlife for human consumption to sustainably produced alternate protein and nutritional sources; (C) establish and effectively manage and protect natural habitat, including protected and conserved areas and the lands of Indigenous peoples and local communities, particularly in countries with tropical forest hotspots for emerging diseases; (D) strengthen veterinary and agricultural extension capacity to improve sanitation along the value chain and biosecurity of live animal markets; and (E) strengthen public health capacity, particularly in countries where there is a high risk of emerging zoonotic viruses and other infectious diseases; (3) respect the rights and needs of indigenous peoples and local communities dependent on such wildlife for nutritional needs and food security; and (4) facilitate international cooperation by working with international partners through intergovernmental, international, and nongovernmental organizations such as the United Nations to— (A) lead a resolution at the United Nations Security Council or General Assembly and World Health Assembly outlining the danger to human and animal health from emerging zoonotic infectious diseases, with recommendations for implementing the closure of wildlife markets and prevention of the commercial trade in live wildlife for human consumption, except where the consumption of wildlife is necessary for local food security or where such actions would significantly disrupt a readily available and irreplaceable food supply. Other interesting sections Page 2,961

“support innovation and public-private partnerships to improve pandemic preparedness and response, including for the development and deployment of effective, accessible, and affordable infectious disease tracking tools, diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines; support collaboration with and among relevant public and private research entities engaged in global health security; and support collaboration between United States universities and public and private institutions in partner countries that promote global health security and innovation.” · “The pandemic early warning systems and emergency operations centers to be established under section 6909; The World health Organization; The Global Health Security Agenda; The Global health Security Initiative; The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria.” “Conduct research that explores the impact of published media such as television, podcast, radio, and newspapers, on society, politics, the spread of hate, harassment, and extremism, security, privacy, and physical or mental health, including considerations for youth development” “Reduce commercial trade in live wildlife for human consumption” “Seek alternate protein sources” FY23 NDAA H.R. 7900 Part 2 LET'S LOOK AT VERBIAGE APPEARING TO WANT TO MOVE AWAY FROM ANIMAL CONSUMPTION INTO “ALTERNATIVE PROTEIN SOURCES” Page 2951 TITLE LXIII—PREVENTING FUTURE PANDEMICS Definition: COMMERCIAL TRADE IN LIVE WILDLIFE.— The term ‘‘commercial trade in live wildlife’’— (A) means commercial trade in live wildlife for human consumption as food or medicine, whether the animals originated in the wild or in a captive environment. Definition: ONE HEALTH.—The term ‘‘One Health’’ means a collaborative, multi-sectoral, and transdisciplinary approach working at the local, regional, national, and global levels with the goal of achieving optimal health outcomes that recognizes the interconnection between— (A) people, animals, both wild and domestic, and plants; and (B) the environment shared by such people, animals, and plants. Definition: WILDLIFE MARKET.—The term ‘‘wildlife market’’— (A) means a commercial market or subsection of a commercial market— (i) where live mammalian or avian wildlife is held, slaughtered, or sold for human consumption as food or medicine whether the animals originated in the wild or in a captive environment; and (ii) that delivers a product in communities where alternative nutritional or protein sources are readily available and affordable. Page 2,954

THE FISCAL YEAR 2023 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT (NDAA) REFERENCED IN THE 2024 GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY STRATEGY The 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Background: The NDAA starts as a massive document then amendments are made and the House and Senate Versions are combined into a smaller document that is more of a “overview” that is the one the President Signs. In order to see if amendments are made to sections you have to go through the VERY long list of actions. However all the verbiages below link to the now released 2024 Global Health Security Strategy. The NDAA is 3,854 pages and a good way to bury a lot of things. If you stick the document in a PDF search tool you can find all the sections I am referring to in my writing and use any other search terms that possibly I am not thinking about yourself. “Global Health Security Agenda 2024”, “GHSA”, International Health Regulations 2005”, “Global Health Security Initiative”, “pandemic”, “COVID-19”, “vaccines”, “World Health Organization”, “disinformation”, “NATO”, “World Bank”, and so on all over the National Defense Authorization Act. Some wording from the NDAA is below I found interesting but you can throw it in an Adobe search app and have fun searching yourself. · SEC. 6908 Establishment of Fund for Global Health Security and Pandemic Preparedness. Starts at page 3289. Very interesting verbiage for an NDAA. · The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Administor of the United States Agency for International Development, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies as necessary and appropriate, should seek to enter into negotiations with DONORS, relevant United Nations agencies, including the World Health Organization and other key multilateral stakeholders, for establishment of – § A multilateral, catalytic financing mechanism for global health security that aligns with and complements ongoing bilateral and multilateral efforts and financing, including through the World Bank, The World Health Organization, The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance. § An Advisory Board § Accelerate country COMPLIANCE with the International Health Regulations (2005) and fulfillment of the Global Health Security Agenda 2024 Framework. § The Fund should be governed by an Executive Board, which should be composed of not more than 20 representatives of DONOR governments, FOUNDATIONS, ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS, CIVIL SOCIETY, and the PRIVATE SECTOR that meet a MINIMUM THRESHOLD in annual CONTRIBUTIONS. · “Enable international collaboration to gain understanding and measure the impacts of foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed at undermining or influencing the policies, security, or stability of the United States and countries that are allies or partners of the United States.” · “Enable international collaboration to gain understanding and measure the impacts of the content moderation, product design decisions, and algorithms of online platforms on society, politics, the spread of hate, harassments, and extremism, security, privacy, and physical or mental health, including consideration for youth development” · “prioritize efforts to enhance the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO’s) capacity to counter misinformation and disinformation.” · “support an increase in NATO’s human, financial, and technological resources and capacity dedicated to understand, respond to, and fight threats in the information space; and support building technological resilience to misinformation and disinformation.” · “accelerates country compliance with the International Health Regulations (2005) and fulfillment of the Global Health Security Agenda 2024 Framework, in coordination with the ongoing Joint External Evaluation national action planning”