Law of Boris
رفتن به کانال در Telegram
Legalism is the Chinese virus. We the people are the cure. www.lawofboris.com
نمایش بیشتر1 259
مشترکین
اطلاعاتی وجود ندارد24 ساعت
+47 روز
+430 روز
در حال بارگیری داده...
کانالهای مشابه
ابر برچسبها
هیچ دادهای
مشکلی وجود دارد؟ لطفاً صفحه را تازه کنید یا با مدیر پشتیبانی ما تماس بگیرید.
اشارات ورودی و خروجی
---
---
---
---
---
---
جذب مشترکین
ژانویه '25
ژانویه '25
+21
در 0 کانالها
دسامبر '24
+22
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '24
+25
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '24
+25
در 1 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '24
+21
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
اوت '24
+36
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '24
+20
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '24
+22
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '24
+26
در 2 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '24
+30
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '24
+24
در 1 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '24
+37
در 2 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '24
+56
در 1 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '23
+49
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '23
+37
در 2 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '23
+39
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '23
+98
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
اوت '23
+50
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئیه '23
+57
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژوئن '23
+50
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
مه '23
+57
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
آوریل '23
+38
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
مارس '23
+58
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
فوریه '23
+42
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
ژانویه '23
+133
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
دسامبر '22
+95
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
نوامبر '22
+36
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
اکتبر '22
+36
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
سپتامبر '22
+76
در 0 کانالها
Get PRO
اوت '22
+349
در 0 کانالها
| تاریخ | رشد مشترکین | اشارات | کانالها | |
| 25 ژانویه | 0 | |||
| 24 ژانویه | 0 | |||
| 23 ژانویه | +1 | |||
| 22 ژانویه | 0 | |||
| 21 ژانویه | +1 | |||
| 20 ژانویه | 0 | |||
| 19 ژانویه | +2 | |||
| 18 ژانویه | +1 | |||
| 17 ژانویه | 0 | |||
| 16 ژانویه | 0 | |||
| 15 ژانویه | 0 | |||
| 14 ژانویه | 0 | |||
| 13 ژانویه | +2 | |||
| 12 ژانویه | +3 | |||
| 11 ژانویه | +1 | |||
| 10 ژانویه | 0 | |||
| 09 ژانویه | +1 | |||
| 08 ژانویه | +3 | |||
| 07 ژانویه | +1 | |||
| 06 ژانویه | +1 | |||
| 05 ژانویه | 0 | |||
| 04 ژانویه | 0 | |||
| 03 ژانویه | +1 | |||
| 02 ژانویه | +2 | |||
| 01 ژانویه | +1 |
پستهای کانال
Wyoming backs Utah's quest to seize BLM land, may want other fed property - WyoFile
https://wyofile.com/wyoming-backs-utahs-quest-to-seize-blm-land-may-want-other-fed-property/
| 2 | looks like someone is fed up with the feds claiming state property | 655 |
| 3 |  One morning a husband returns to the cabin after several hours of fishing and decides to take a nap.
Although not familiar with the lake, the wife decides to take the boat out, since it is such a beautiful day. She motors out a short distance, anchors, and reads her book.
Along comes a Game Warden in his boat. He pulls up alongside the woman and says," Good morning, Ma'am, what are you doing"?
"Reading a book," she replies, (thinking, "Isn't that obvious"?)
"You're in a Restricted Fishing Area," he informs her.
"I'm sorry, officer, but I'm not fishing, I'm reading."
"Yes, but you have all the equipment. I'll have to write you up a ticket."
"For reading a book"? she replies.
"You're in a Restricted Fishing Area," he informs her again.
"But officer, I'm not fishing, I'm reading."
"Yes, but you have all the equipment. For all I know you could start at any moment. I'll have to write you up a ticket and you'll have to pay a fine."
"If you do that, I'll have to charge you with sexual assault," says the woman.
"But I haven't even touched you," says the Game Warden.
"That's true, but you have all the equipment. For all I know you could start at any moment."
"Have a nice day ma'am," and he immediately departed.
MORAL: Never argue with a woman who reads. It's likely she can also think.🔥🏆 | 682 |
| 4 | https://x.com/jackstr42679640/status/1841371969985593731?s=46
More "rumors" regarding the "receeding of the waters" ... it is all moving exactly as it should....
Ports first (think "beach-head")... then the "customs houses" which will secure the treasury and the banking system (tax collection, import duries, tariffs, etc...) ... then the courts ... | 1 647 |
| 5 | https://www.youtube.com/shorts/M8j1xWbyfjI?feature=share | 913 |
| 6 | https://www.youtube.com/shorts/A2TIflU-FVs
Life imitates a Chappelle Skit ... | 780 |
| 7 | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placeholder_name
Aulus Agerius = plaintiff = "[I] set in motion"
Numerius Negidius = defendant = "[I] refuse to pay"
Legal
In ancient Roman law, the names Aulus Agerius and Numerius Negidius were used to represent the plaintiff and the defendant. The names were both wordplays, respectively meaning "[I] set in motion" and "[I] refuse to pay". The model instruction to judges for civil suits began with si paret Numerium Negidium Aulo Agerio sestertium decem milia dare oportere, meaning "if [it] appears that Numerius Negidius ought to pay Aulus Agerius ten thousand sesterces...". | 818 |
| 8 | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgLD1yhxNik | 1 032 |
| 9 |  VIDEO: As news spreads about the death of Jacob Rothchild, footage has emerged showing his final moments as he is seen surrounded by Klaus Schwab, George Soros and his Globalist friends in the World Economic Forum who look on tenderly | 1 326 |
| 10 | VIDEO: As news spreads about the death of Jacob Rothchild, footage has emerged showing his final moments as he is seen surrounded by Klaus Schwab, George Soros and his Globalist friends in the World Economic Forum who look on tenderly #JFK_TV
IF YOU ARE STILL THINKING REPTOS ARE NOT REAL, PLEASE SIGN UP AT YOUR NEXT RECRUITMENT CENTER TO GET YOUR TRAINING FIGHTING THESE PUR EVIL BASTARDS IN THE UNDERGROUND...
PRAY FOR EVERY SINGLE WARRIOR WHO IS SACREFCIING HIS/ HER LIFE FIGHTING THESE PUR EVIL ADRENOCHROME JUNKIES -
TO SAVE OUR CHILDREN IS PRIO NUMBER 1 as THEY PREFER THE YOUNGER THE BETTER!!
YOUR IGNORANCE IS THEIR POWER! SO STOP BEING IGNORANT AND START TO PAY ATTENTION!!!
🦎 REPTOS, LIZARDS and SHAPESHIFTERS
--->>>
https://rumble.com/v2vwjv0--reptos-lizards-and-shapeshifters.html
⚡️ The Reptilian Agenda explained - THEY CONTROLLED the EARTH as PRISON PLANET
--->>>
https://rumble.com/v2xogw8-the-reptilian-agenda-explained.html
🔥 These Reptilian Overlords are Extra-terrestrial, Interdimensional, and Subterranean
--->>>
https://rumble.com/v2xtae6-these-reptilian-overlords-are-extra-terrestrial-interdimensional-and-subter.html
Regarding REPTOS,
we @DUMBSandUNDERGROUND recommend our partner channel, many Videos about the Reptos and more
--->>>
https://rumble.com/c/ReptoTV
------------------------------------
⚔THE INVISIBLE WAR⚔ in
@DUMBSandUNDERGROUND
@DUMBSandCLONING
🍕 SAVE OUR CHILDREN and
@EXPOSEthePEDOSendOfTheCABAL | 2 |
| 11 |  Just spoke about this last night 🎯🔥🐂🇺🇸 | 1 029 |
| 12 | You all REALLY want to launch an "attack at the heart of the beast" ???
Here is an issue we all should be working on .... Write the Legislature, Archives, Library of Congress, etc.., etc...
Do what you all do best, follow the trail .... here it the “lead in”:
With the 1929 Permanent Apportionment Act, Congress limited itself to the current 435 morons, and, the 100 Senate delegates, who “run the show”
US Constitution: Art. I, Sec. 2: The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand
based on last census: 330 million Americans = ~ 11,000 representatives
based on last Presidential Election: 160 million voters = ~ 5,333 representatives
either way, it appears we are a bit short in the seats ...
An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both Houses of Congress, or, if two-thirds of the States request one, by a convention called for that purpose. The amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of the State legislatures, or three-fourths of conventions called in each State for ratification according to Article V.
So, where is EVIDENCE and PROOF of the “Amendment proposed by two-thirds vote in BOTH Houses of Congress”? OR of the 2/3 of the States called for a “Convention for that purpose”?”
AND
Where is the “proof of ratification” by 3/4 of the State legislatures” OR
by 3/4 of the “Conventions called in each State for ratification”?
Otherwise, ALL ELECTIONS, including ALL PURPORTED LAWS since 1929 have been ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL because the proper amount of “Representatives” were never voted on, much less PROPERLY SEATED
... think about that one for a moment | 2 386 |
| 13 | https://youtube.com/shorts/_zQp2aaNfK0?si=vok3qQ8N94cNTGvy | 1 512 |
| 14 | Convo_with_DC_Lawyer_1.mp3 | 1 229 |
| 15 | Start at around 7:07 ...
This is the face of usurpation ...
When these guys meet in public and all the people are coming in petition and lay their grievances, exactly WHICH board is present? | 1 399 |
| 16 | AI for Lawyers:
https://www.spellbook.legal/
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8H2KLAy/
it is all coming to a crescendo ... the lines have been drawn, people's ballots have been cast, their futures in doubt, their choices locked in; are you ready for the finale?
what will be the future of humanity? Left to devils; or led by the Saints? | 1 609 |
| 17 | https://rumble.com/v40mjti-state-and-country-judges-attorneys-and-legislators-must-return-it-all.html | 2 098 |
| 18 | remember this: https://rumble.com/vek9mr-law-of-boris-part-2-of-8.html ??
all the "financials" are all contained within the first 10 or so pages of your local CAFR Reports ... massive amounts of monies are collected that are well above and beyond the "necessary expenses of Government" ... this is "government for profit" which is FASCISM, and, they ( the Actors ) are forcing the people into allegiances:
US Citizens = Federal Employees = "enfranchised electorate" of that FASCIST Government "administrated" as "employees" violating "company policies" with this bullshit which violates Art. IV, Sec. 4 of the Constitution, and constitutes a "war crime" under 18 USC 2441(c)(2) https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2441 for violations of (1907) Hague Art. 23, cl. 9 https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hague04.asp#art23
"But the term (State) is also used to express the idea of a people or political community, as distinguished from the government. In this sense, it is used in the clause which provides that the United States shall guarantee to every State in the Union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion." Texas v. White, 74 U.S. 700, 700 (1868) (overruled on other grounds by Morgan v. United States, 113 U.S. 476 (1885)).
So, it is NOT the GOVERNMENTS in the States that are protected, it is the PEOPLE'S RIGHT to a REPUBLICAN FORM of GOVERNMENT in those States that is protected; and,
these accounts show that a FASCIST (FOR PROFIT / CORPORATE GOVERNMENT) is in operation in the States, invading the PEOPLE's RIGHT to a REPUBLICAN FORM of GOVERNMENT guaranteed under Art. IV, Section 4 of the Federal Constitution (1789); FASCIST FORM is profiting from the REPUBLICAN FORM being actively denied and deprived by "administrating" The People as "employees" violating "company policies" or, maybe even as "Militia" being Disciplined in an JUDICIALLY DECLARED "emergency action" by "Sheriff's and Deputies" which are part of the JUDICIAL BRANCH, thus acting as EXECUTIVE and JUDICAL in violation of the "separation of powers"; and,
it is the DUTY of the UNITED STATES (Military) to protect THEM (The People) against INVASION by FASCISM; COMMUNISM / MARXISM, forms of Governments who reject Our "Free Will Exercise" of Our Republican Form of Government
So, when the "State Actors" use these "State Resources" to Deny and Deprive Our Republican Form of Government by FORCING the People to "swear allegiances," (as US Citizens: "federally enfranchised employees"), the State is being INVADED by "US Citizens" (foreign agents as "United States is a foreign corporation with resect to the States," therefore usurping State Authority while "belligerently occupying" State Public Offices (unregistered foreign agents), and
it is the duty of the United States (Military) to "protect against this invasion"; assisting the "State militia" : the People of the State (ie: floridians, texians, michiganders, etc.., etc.. who occupy their Constitutional Office at Art. 1, Sect. 8, cl. 15 of the Federal Constitution (1789): the CIVIL AUTHORITY) repel the "invasion" by the "Federal Militia" (US Citizens) because they are committing "war crimes" in their "war against the Constitution" as the "rejection" Our "Free Will Exercise" of Our Republican Form of Government, in EVERY COURT OF LAW, violates Hague IV, Art 23 (1907) and 18 USC 2441(c)(2), like the godless heathens they are; depriving Our Right to Inherit the "earth" as God Commanded, for we are of the "earth," made in the "image" of God; .
If you can't claim to the "earth," you will never have "standing" because you never have "footing," thus are never "grounded."
"Rise and Rise Again, Until Lambs Become Lions" - inscription on a sword in Russell Crowe's version of "Robin Hood" | 1 393 |
| 19 | https://youtu.be/QL2w4KPrwFs
it is all about MINIMUM CONTACTS
Watch this video, this dude basically nails it; albeit a little nervously, which is to be expected in that environment
there are two causes of action: CIVIL and CRIMINAL (CAUSES)
CIVIL = contract, agreements, etc.., etc...
CRIMINAL boils down to TWO JURISDICTIONS (NATURE):
Common Law (NATURE) = (CAUSE) the there is a real victim who was injured; accused has right to confront face to face; verifiable claim, etc.., etc.. This is really only applicable when there is physical, bodily harm to another soul/victim; this is also termed "universal jurisdiction" within the law
the other one is Admiralty/Maritime Law = Law by Congress = Martial Law = Art. 1, Sec. 8, cl. 17 jurisdiction (NATURE) .... (CAUSE) So, if the INCIDENT did not occur upon SOIL that was CEDED to the United States, how did a "JUDICIAL OFFICER" obtain the RIGHT to ENFORCE LAW, when that is an EXECUTIVE BRANCH FUNCTION? Where is the ORDER from the EXECUTIVE BRANCH, Commander-in-Chief, and/or Adjunct General in charge of the Militia [US Citizen = militia; see Art. X, Sec. 2 "Florida Constitution (1968)" and 10 USC 246) otherwise, we got a problem under Hague IV, Art 23 (1907) and 18 USC 2441(c)(2) because the COURT is DEMANDING one SWEAR ALLEGEANCE and DELCARING INABMISSABLE, IN A COURT OF LAW, the rights and actions of the nationals of the hostile party (Natives of the Several States; Floridians, Michiganders, Texians, etc.., etc...)
Further, it is likewise forbidden to compel the nationals of the hostile party to take part in the operations of war directed against their own country, even if they were in the belligerent's service before the commencement of the war = FORCING the "nationals of the hostile party" to CLAIM to be US CITIZENS [violating 18 USC 911] in order to create a NEXUS [by way of CONSCRIPTION] for "fabricated pension and bounty contracts" [false claims submitted the United States as "putting down insurrection and rebellion" because violations of Statutes under the "War Powers" is a "crime"]
So, what this guy did was break it all down right in front of the judge in open court
?What is the Cause and Nature of the Action?
?Is this a CIVIL MATTER or a CRIMINAL MATTER?
Since Judge admitted it was CRIMINAL, watch HOW he broke it all down into the NATURE of the action, and, more importantly, LISTEN to the reaction of the judge (turn of captions, it helps) .... watch it at least 10 times, and break it all down for yourself, you will see
it is all about "MINIMUM CONTACTS" ... everything else is just "Stockholm Syndrome"
MINIMUM CONTACTS are a nonresident civil defendant’s connections with the forum state (i.e., the state where the lawsuit is brought) that are sufficient for the forum state to assert personal jurisdiction over that defendant. Lack of minimum contacts violates the nonresident defendant’s constitutional right to due process and “offends traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice” (International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945)). Defendants’ minimum contacts can take the form of general jurisdiction or specific jurisdiction. Some examples of minimum contacts include conducting business within the state, incorporating in the state, and visiting the state.
STATE being the operative word ... what is the CONSTITUTIONAL definition of "State" VS. STATUTORY definition of "State" | 1 173 |
| 20 | https://youtu.be/QL2w4KPrwFs
it is all about MINIMUM CONTACTS
Watch this video, this dude basically nails it; albeit a little nervously, which is to be expected in that environment
there are two causes of action: CIVIL and CRIMINAL (CAUSES)
CIVIL = contract, agreements, etc.., etc...
CRIMINAL boils down to TWO JURISDICTIONS (NATURE):
Common Law (NATURE) = (CAUSE) the there is a real victim who was injured; accused has right to confront face to face; verifiable claim, etc.., etc.. This is really only applicable when there is physical, bodily harm to another soul/victim; this is also termed "universal jurisdiction" within the law
the other one is Admiralty/Maritime Law = Law by Congress = Martial Law = Art. 1, Sec. 8, cl. 17 jurisdiction (NATURE) .... (CAUSE) So, if the INCIDENT did not occur upon SOIL that was CEDED to the United States, how did a "JUDICIAL OFFICER" obtain the RIGHT to ENFORCE LAW, when that is an EXECUTIVE BRANCH FUNCTION? Where is the ORDER from the EXECUTIVE BRANCH, Commander-in-Chief, and/or Adjunct General in charge of the Militia [US Citizen = militia; see Art. X, Sec. 2 "Florida Constitution (1968)" and 10 USC 246) otherwise, we got a problem under Hague IV, Art 23 (1907) and 18 USC 2441(c)(2) because the COURT is DEMANDING one SWEAR ALLEGEANCE and DELCARING INABMISSABLE, IN A COURT OF LAW, the rights and actions of the nationals of the hostile party (Natives of the Several States; Floridians, Michiganders, Texians, etc.., etc...)
Further, it is likewise forbidden to compel the nationals of the hostile party to take part in the operations of war directed against their own country, even if they were in the belligerent's service before the commencement of the war = FORCING the "nationals of the hostile party" to CLAIM to be US CITIZENS [violating 18 USC 911] in order to create a NEXUS [by way of CONSCRIPTION] for "fabricated pension and bounty contracts" [false claims submitted the United States as "putting down insurrection and rebellion" because violations of Statutes under the "War Powers" is a "crime"]
So, what this guy did was break it all down right in front of the judge in open court
?What is the Cause and Nature of the Action?
?Is this a CIVIL MATTER or a CRIMINAL MATTER?
Since Judge admitted it was CRIMINAL, watch HOW he broke it all down into the NATURE of the action, and, more importantly, LISTEN to the reaction of the judge (turn of captions, it helps) .... watch it at least 10 times, and break it all down for yourself, you will see
it is all about "MINIMUM CONTACTS" ... everything else is just "Stockholm Syndrome"
MINIMUN CONTACTS are a nonresident civil defendant’s connections with the forum state (i.e., the state where the lawsuit is brought) that are sufficient for the forum state to assert personal jurisdiction over that defendant. Lack of minimum contacts violates the nonresident defendant’s constitutional right to due process and “offends traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice” (International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945)). Defendants’ minimum contacts can take the form of general jurisdiction or specific jurisdiction. Some examples of minimum contacts include conducting business within the state, incorporating in the state, and visiting the state.
STATE being the operative word ... what is the CONSTITUTIONAL definition of "State" VS. STATUTORY definition of "State" | 1 |
