[⚠️Terrorist] Fully Automated Luxury Lesbian Space Anarcho Communism

Telegram short domain name (all external links rely on) was just removed from global DNS system without any context, warning, or even notification for the owner. #SocialMedia@GameDEV #Legal@GameDEV

I wish the polish were right and Germans could just shut the f up.

Climate.gov was destroyed. Open data saved it. by Ben Werdmuller Climate.us, who the site the data got saved at and their research continues

I mean look, there is definitely things to critic about the ICJ/ICC and the UN especially being very first world friendly and a tool of "western" hegemony, which makes the recent attacks by the US of which especially weird, since they are without a doubt the ones who provide from its existence the most. It really is a US pouting that they too for once get held accountable for "their" actions.

Propaganda is always at the core an explanation for something, most of the time why "we" are good and righteous and "they" are evil and barbarous, the more truth is at core, the better the propaganda. And to not shy away from being critical beyond "this is insane" I thought to try to deconstruct this speech or statement, that is seemingly made and directed for/to the US-American people. Some quote aren't 1:1 but loosely to keep it short. "Americans govern themselves, free and sovereign people, choose own leaders, laws and stand before juries of our own peers." This is to explain, that the US is law-abiding and war crimes get trialed, without the need of any "non-US" institution and supra-national organization. (we know that's not true, see the Iraq or Afghanistan wars, we know US soldiers have committed and still are committing war crimes regularly and not getting trialed for it) "powerful people and far-away places" The ICC is part of the UN, whose HQ is in NYC. This is to make it sound more foreign as if it was something foreign trying to rule over them. "chances are you don't know the names of its judges, prosecutors or its president" I mean firstly to act like judges in general are vastly known by US citizens seems weird. Maybe it's US thing, but I wouldn't know the judges of the country I'm currently residing in. The judges of the ICC are elected on the bases of a balance of female and male as well as continents of origin, to ensure fair and a balanced international judgment. The judges are of course academically educated in the field of international law and often local laws from different countries. "as we speak, the ICC and its friends are waging a war against our country" Especially curious is the "and its friends" here, but the whole narrative as the foreign force attacking is pretty obvious, which will later be relevant too. "the ICC was born 24 years ago" That is true, but makes it sound like it's not proven to work or that it is some kind of novelty. The ICC and ICJ are results of the second world war and trials of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan and still have elements of that time to have a way to handle laws especially regarding war between country and leaving the sovereignty of a country. "would step in to prosecute only the gravest offenses -- things like genocide and war crimes -- and only when a nation's courts were unable to prosecute them on their own. But the truth is,..." You can literally just ignore "but the truth is", because he himself explained it actually lmao "Today, it threatens every aspect of our political and legal system. Border patrol agents removing violent criminals from our country. American Marines risking their lives to defend our homeland." It doesn't threaten every aspect of their political and legal system, unless the political and legal system is based on war criminals or protects war criminals, which could be counted as a self-report really. "If we stand idle, all of them would be at the mercy of foreign judges thousands of miles away -- facing the constant risk of prosecution and even imprisonment for the so-called "crime" of defending their own country." Just like the defending our homeland line, these are surreal and untrue statements, since the US had no ground invasion or proper foreign interference probably since it's inspection, unless you can isolated terror-attacks as that, which I know they do and is their bases to invade countries that "harbor" these "terrorists". But the whole statement is pretty much saying that they don't do war crimes and if they are doing war crimes they are getting properly trialed by a US court. "We fought a revolution against a foreign power" To circle back to the beginning and trying to make it sound like it's just like the war of independence during the American Revolution and break from the British crown, while it's nothing like that. The American Resolve is probably referring to the Hague Invasion Act

So many insane passages in that statement

VIDEO | "We will teach the ICC the full meaning of American resolve." US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has issued a stark warning regarding the International Criminal Court (ICC), accusing the tribunal of attempting to establish itself as an "unaccountable arbiter" that threatens US sovereignty. Rubio ended with a direct threat, saying that the US will "teach the ICC the full meaning of American resolve."