Stephen Wells

Politics is all about delegitimising your political enemies, and legitimising yourself and your ideology.

For all the One Nation haters this is actually your perfect opportunity to hate on them? Just call them cucks and traitors, who want a brown Australia, etc.

Twitter Nazi Tough Guys trying to say “Who cares, One Nation are jew lovers so why bother flaming them” is retarded. We shouldn’t bother delegitimising them? Should we have not bothered delegitimising the Liberal party either? We knew the Liberal party were cucks and jew lovers and would never propose or deliver on any immigration cuts. Yet the radical right spent 5 years calling out their betrayals, inaction, and drift to the centre and moderacy. The pressure we applied eroded the Liberals credibility and delegitimised them with their own former base and created space for alternatives. Which One Nation has, up until now, profited from by promising to address the issues that the Liberal Party refused to. Immigration and free speech in that order. That is the only reason they gained popularity. Claiming they will address these issues that the public want to see addressed. Applying the exact same standard and method to One Nation, as we did with the Liberals is therefore consistent and the correct strategic move. Refusing to contest and call them out now because “who cares they are zog” or some other low iq reductionist retard dismissal would be strategically retarded. It would allow them to keep their nationalist branding they have stumbled into whilst softening and watering down their actual policy and moving right wing discourse backwards.

NSW Premier Chris Minns has said he wants to allow armed members of a Mossad-linked Jewish security organisation to patrol public events, despite police repeatedly warning it would harm social cohesion. https://www.noticer.news/nsw-premier-arm-csg-public-events/ Follow: @NoticerNews

I think the NSN were attacked by violent radicals much more often than Jews over the last few years, so if we win the High Court case I think the White Australia Party should be allowed to protect itself with its own armed security. Fair's fair after all.

1pm Perth

One Nation has built its support by promising to end mass immigration, but seemingly overnight they’ve changed their policy to now be “not too different” to Labor’s. If a policy written clearly on One Nation’s website can suddenly become negotiable once political and industry pressure arrives, what about the other promises on that website? Their website commits to repealing all hate speech laws, abolishing all censorship bodies, and holding a free speech referendum to enshrine it in our Constitution. But when do you hear this commitment come out of Pauline’s mouth? Even as Pauline Hanson herself is sued by another senator over racism, she simply wants to “fight 18C”. Why not abolish it? Why not stand with us on August 30? March for Australia is not a One Nation campaign, and our support for any political party is conditional. Politicians do not get loyalty simply because they call themselves right wing. They get support when they deliver what Australians elected them to do. Mass immigration has become politically impossible to ignore because ordinary Australians forced it onto the agenda during the first March for Australia last August. Free speech needs exactly the same pressure. That is what August 30 is about. We are going to put patriots into the streets whether One Nation joins us or not. In many ways, it’s going to be even more symbolic if they don’t. We are going to show every politician in the country that ending mass immigration matters, restoring free speech matters, and neither issue is negotiable. One Nation will not improve because its supporters make excuses for it. It will improve when its supporters make it politically painful to betray them. Our message is simple: Stop mass immigration. Give Australians back their freedom of speech. Join us this weekend, August 30, and March for Australia.

Australia is a Third-World banana republic in all but name – with a Third-World economy, Third-World laws and an increasingly Third-World population. Take a look at the reasoning of King’s Counsel who are paid millions of dollars to think and argue about laws. Popular sovereignty can stop popular sovereignty so we need to stop popular sovereignty when popular sovereignty stops popular sovereignty. Sometimes A stops A, so we need to stop A before A stops A. These are apparently our nation’s most gifted legal minds. But of course, popular sovereignty to these people just means a popular sovereignty that reflects the politics of the current government. What they are talking about here is not popular sovereignty, but multiculturalism. Sometimes popular sovereignty stops multiculturalism, so we need to stop popular sovereignty before popular sovereignty stops multiculturalism. Sometimes A stops B, so we need to stop A before A stops B. This is what the laws amount to. The government is just too dishonest to admit that they believe that liberal-democracy is over now and it has been replaced with police-state multiculturalism. If the Zionists want the Australian Government to be able to ban political parties that oppose Zionism and multiculturalism, then they should hold a referendum and ask the population if they want to change the Constitution from a liberal-democratic document into a police-state multiculturalist one. As it stands today, that is the process that the Constitution outlines. If the High Court rules in favour of the Commonwealth in this case, it will only prove that the Constitution isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on.

And this is why whatever the outcome next month, we win. I expect we will lose the case. Not because our case is unsound, but because I believe corruption of our courts to be too systemic to get a fair outcome. But once the tyranny is ratified by the High Court it simply hastens the system's demise. Hard times will obviously follow but the darkest hour is just before dawn.

The Australian Federal Police has admitted counter-terrorism is less than 10% of its budget, and it is spending almost four times more on protecting politicians as social cohesion crumbles. https://www.noticer.news/afp-funding-protection-counter-terrorism/ Follow: @NoticerNews

I foresee a day when the traitors need to be protected from the policemen who have decided their pay cheques arent enough to become traitors themselves.

Imagine the case is won, and ASIO will have just absolutely nuked themselves publicly by supporting and initiating this ban and making up all this nonsense that NSN was pheonixing, with the whole process being obviously politically motivated and directed by the Labor party. All that cooperation and complicity with the Labor government and tanking any semblance of their “politically neutral charter” only for NSN to potentially be back on the streets will be so funny. Certified canberra bubble and lack of second order thinking moment. Same if One Nation forms government in 18 months, they’ll almost certainly do a house cleaning on the institution for clear political preferencing in opposition to their supposed charter. https://t.me/SwindonArchive/2028

Its nice to dream. I am preparing for a corrupt outcome from a corrupt system. The fight will go on.

Presumably, if the White Australia Party gained a majority in the Australian Parliament, it could enter into the God Bless Adolf Hitler International Treaty and suspend elections thereafter. After all, the treaty requires signatories to suspend elections as they are Jewish and cause great spiritual and physical harm to Aryan peoples. The external affairs power allows you to ignore the rest of the Constitution when it’s convenient, so say the lawyers of the Commonwealth and the States.

If the Constition allows the Government to make international treaties that oblige it to override other parts of the Constitution then what is the point of a Constitution? Surely any part of a treaty that a Government makes with other countries that invalidates any other part of the Constution, must be invalid, unlawful and possibly an act of treason. Our Constitution can only be changed with the informed consent of the Australian people via referendum.

New X Article, summarising the arguments put forward by each of the states in the White Australia Party High Court case. Explores each state briefly at a time, and how their arguments are largely technical attempts to distinguish the prohibited hate group organisation from existing case law precedents. Notably, Queensland has intervened neutrally, in support of neither party, and argues concerns about the nationhood power that the Commonwealth is relying on, could later be used to erode state powers under federalism as a result of loosely used "national emergency" situations, however supported the other elements of the legislation. Read time: 6 -7 minutes, there was a lot of filed material to have to condense and summarise. You can view without leaving telegram at this link below: https://fixupx.com/LonePatriot14/status/2090970111914250391?s=20

The concerted efforts of our corrupt political class have been concentrated on overwhelming this case in their favour. I wonder how much personal pressure has been put on the Judge behind the scenes.

The moral of the story: Trying to get a discount from a hooker is rape.