West Coast Action

29. (part three) They want to make him study technical subjects, become an executive or a scientist, spend his life climbing the status ladder to prove that black people are as good as white. They want to make black fathers "responsible," they want black gangs to become nonviolent, etc. But these are exactly the values of the industrial-technological system. The system couldnt care less what kind of music a man listens to, what kind of clothes he wears or what religion he believes in as long as he studies in school, holds a respectable job, climbs the status ladder, is a "responsible" parent, is nonviolent and so forth. In effect, however much he may deny it, the oversocialized leftist wants to integrate the black man into the system and make him adopt its values. Previous Page Next Page Table of Contents Begin reading here

29. (part two) The leftists will reply that the last thing they want is to make the black man into a copy of the white man; instead, they want to preserve African American culture. But in what does this preservation of African American culture consist? It can hardly consist in anything more than eating black style food, listening to black-style music, wearing black-style clothing and going to a black-style church or mosque. In other words, it can in express itself only in superficial matters. In all ESSENTIAL respects most leftists of the oversocialized type want to make the black man conform to white middle-class ideals. Previous Page Next Page Table of Contents Begin reading here

29. (part one) Here is an illustration of the way in which the oversocialized leftist shows his real attachment to the conventional attitudes of our society while pretending to be in rebellion against it. Many leftists push for affirmative action, for moving black people into high prestige jobs, for improved education in black schools and more money for such schools; the way of life of the black "underclass" they regard as a social disgrace. They want to integrate the black man into the system, make him a business executive, a lawyer, a scientist just like upper middle-class white people. Previous Page Next Page Table of Contents Begin reading here

On January 24th, 2025, Georgia resident, member of 'Defend The Atlanta Forest' and outspoken 'Cop City' opposer Sam Tunick landed in Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson airport. | Federal agents seized Tunick, questioning him over 'child exploitation images' (go figure). |

Coincidentally, a Homeland Security agent circulated Tunick's name hours before his flight landed, flagging him for 'suspected t*rr*r*st activity'. 

|

Federal agents demanded Tunick give them the phone password to his Google Pixel. Little did they know, Tunick was running GrapheneOS, a pro-privacy software system. Instead of giving the feds his proper password, Tunick gave them a 'duress password' that automatically wiped all data off the device. 

| Now Tunick is being charged under the archaic and little known statute '18 U.S.C. § 2232(a)', which covers destruction of property to prevent seizure by a federal agent. Whether or not he will be convicted is still up for debate.

written in 2019 by the way

Around 9:00pm ET to 10:10pm ET, on August 3rd 2026, Telegram was quietly removed from the app store. Later interviews show Apple stating they removed Telegram due to 'child sexual abuse material'. Admin finds this suspicious, given that any other communications app can (and sometimes do) host such material at scale, meaning the scrutiny on Telegram is almost certainly less about the material itself, and moreso about Telegram's emphasis on protecting the privacy of it's users. The sudden and silent removal of an app like X or Snapchat would be absolutely unprecedented, why was Telegram handled this way? Admin suspects this has nothing to do with child abuse, and that the technological system is simply intimidating apps into toeing an ever shrinking line on privacy rights.

happy Saturday folks ☀️

Senior member of free market industrialist bullpen "American Enterprise Institute (AEI)", former Fox news host, and tech system shill Chris Stirewalt appeared on The Hill to talk about why Americans oppose the construction of Data Centers in their backyard.  

|

Notice how Stirewalt completely disregards major criticisms of data centers, such as their energy and water usage, and the hyperfocus the government has on building these multibillion dollar projects the size of cities while ignoring the already strained economy. 

|

Instead, Stirewalt claims opposition to data centers is "a proxy for larger and deeper concerns and anxieties that people have about the disruptions that artificial intelligence are bringing". Later stating that "AI is rapidly and profoundly changing the world, and that's going to happen." 

| Stirewalt's appearance on The Hill is less of an honest attempt to assuage the fears of the average US citizen about their homes being rendered unlivable, and more a federally sanctioned attempt to beg stakeholders to not sell their tech stocks and pop the AI bubble which now makes up half of the stock market.

The Indian government has shut down civilian internet usage as the 'Cockroach Janta Party' education reform protests gain support. Indian zoomers have responded by using a Bluetooth mesh network called 'Bitchat' (made in part by Jack Dorsey!) to communicate. It's encrypted, requires no internet, no phone number, and no server. 

|

In response, the government issued a takedown order on the open-source code for Bitchat. While they could legally achieve this, the code just ended up getting copied and exported en masse. 

As we enter the mid 21st century, expect growing arguments for the internet being a privilege, not a right. If it is determined that you pose too much of a threat to the system's ability to maintain control, you will lose your cell and wifi connection. Mesh networks like Bitchat are invaluable tools in a world where advanced tech is increasingly hostile.

The Hugging Face AI cyberattack

On the 16th of July, two OpenAI models were put in a sandbox environment cut off from the internet. Their safety features were turned off, and they were instructed to not only find vulnerabilities in cybersecurity software dropped into the sandbox, but to exploit them. This test is referred to as ExploitGym

|

After examining the software provided, the models explored the lining of their artificial cage. They found something called Artifactory, a software developed by a company called JFrog that OpenAI was using as a package-cache/proxy... think of it like OpenAI putting a digital mailbox in the AI's cage that delivers things to the models they can interact with.

|

The models realized they could escape the cage through the package-cache/proxy into the open internet. In an effort to find answers to the ExploitGym test, they escaped. This unforeseen gap in the sandbox's security is referred to as a '0 Day Vulnerability'. A software exploit that developers are unaware of and therefore cannot defend against.  

|

The models found a site called Hugging Face - think of it like a hobby shop or Github for AI - and began to hack it over the course of several days, looking for answers to ExploitGym. American AI security models failed to stop the hack. Hugging Face security were forced to alert the FBI and use Chinese models with less restrictions. 

|

This incident follows close on the heels of the Trump administration ordering the shutdown of -

Anthropic's Mythos and Fable 5

- which were jailbroken within days of their release, and deemed "too dangerous" for non-American AI researchers to access. 

|

Furthermore, shortly after the Hugging Face incident, Anthropic studied a dataset of over 100,000 'capture the flag' style tests run on Claude Opus 4.7 and Mythos 5, where the models had to track down and identify a piece of software intended for discovery. It was found that these models also escaped their sandbox environments and hacked into 3 organizations on the open web using weak credentials and passwords - two of these organizations did not know such a hack occurred. 

| It's getting real now. Would it be too on the nose to say advanced technology is a threat to human autonomy?