AISecHub
Ir al canal en Telegram
Powered by InnovGuard.com | https://www.linkedin.com/groups/14545517/ | https://x.com/AISecHub | https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbCsLfRBVJkzag0MUe0K
Mostrar másEl país no está especificadoTecnologías y Aplicaciones25 850
2 652
Suscriptores
+124 horas
+217 días
+8430 días
Archivo de publicaciones
2 652
5 Lessons from the OpenAI–Hugging Face Incident
1️⃣ AI creates real cybersecurity risk
2️⃣ The Hugging Face incident was not simply an unavoidable “loss of control”
3️⃣ Sandboxing alone is insufficient
4️⃣ AI-agent security needs defense in depth
5️⃣ The fundamental failure was organizational, not technological
https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/5-lessons-from-the-openai-hugging
2 652
Trusting the it’s NOT us, it’s the AI people. Good luck!
https://openai.com/collective-cyberdefense/
2 652
When you read this report, you get the feeling that they are blaming AI and the agents for everything that happened in this incident.
People online, of course, noticed the way the report was written. It is a little strange that there is almost no acknowledgment of responsibility from the humans who developed and operated these agents. The writing makes it seem as though you can simply blame the agents and move on.
They are facing lawsuits, and this report is not exactly helping them.
Repeat after me: Agents are bad. AI is bad.
This approach to personal accountability is not particularly impressive.
