617
Suscriptores
+324 horas
+97 días
+1630 días
Carga de datos en curso...
Canales Similares
Sin datos
¿Algún problema? Por favor, actualice la página o contacte a nuestro gerente de soporte.
Nube de Etiquetas
Menciones Entrantes y Salientes
---
---
---
---
---
---
Atraer Suscriptores
agosto '26
agosto '26
+31
en 3 canales
julio '26
+10
en 1 canales
Get PRO
junio '26
+11
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '26
+19
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '26
+44
en 3 canales
Get PRO
marzo '26
+40
en 2 canales
Get PRO
febrero '26
+67
en 4 canales
Get PRO
enero '26
+66
en 3 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '25
+83
en 4 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '25
+167
en 9 canales
Get PRO
octubre '25
+24
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '25
+45
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '250
en 1 canales
Get PRO
julio '25
+59
en 1 canales
Get PRO
junio '250
en 1 canales
Get PRO
mayo '25
+33
en 2 canales
Get PRO
abril '250
en 1 canales
Get PRO
marzo '25
+107
en 1 canales
| Fecha | Crecimiento de Suscriptores | Menciones | Canales | |
| 31 agosto | +2 | |||
| 30 agosto | +3 | |||
| 29 agosto | +1 | |||
| 28 agosto | 0 | |||
| 27 agosto | +2 | |||
| 26 agosto | +5 | |||
| 25 agosto | +2 | |||
| 24 agosto | 0 | |||
| 23 agosto | +1 | |||
| 22 agosto | +1 | |||
| 21 agosto | +1 | |||
| 20 agosto | 0 | |||
| 19 agosto | 0 | |||
| 18 agosto | 0 | |||
| 17 agosto | +3 | |||
| 16 agosto | +1 | |||
| 15 agosto | +1 | |||
| 14 agosto | +3 | |||
| 13 agosto | 0 | |||
| 12 agosto | 0 | |||
| 11 agosto | +2 | |||
| 10 agosto | 0 | |||
| 09 agosto | 0 | |||
| 08 agosto | 0 | |||
| 07 agosto | +1 | |||
| 06 agosto | 0 | |||
| 05 agosto | 0 | |||
| 04 agosto | 0 | |||
| 03 agosto | +1 | |||
| 02 agosto | 0 | |||
| 01 agosto | +1 |
Publicaciones del Canal
| 2 | We are ALL singing this.
Sing it here: Petition link🤩 | 1 |
| 3 | In Industrial society the ethics of freedom of choice that emerged during the Renaissance and the Enlightenment periods don't apply anymore. Technology develops at such a speed that the old concepts of individual rights and possibilities become meaningless. For example, population control which is needed today is clearly in direct opposition to the idea of freedom, however, it's a necessary action in order to save what's left of the biosphere (one of many necessary actions). Another example is the freedom of trade that is the center of consumerism today. Should we allow people in the developed world to obtain meaningless products or use meaningless services when these collective actions lead to serious problems (pollution among many others)? Of course not!
My point is that if we (eco-fascists and anti-tech radicals) want to reshape this world we need to abandon the old concepts of ethics/morality and embrace new ones that will apply to our revolutionary worldview. | 55 |
| 4 | In Industrial society the ethics of freedom of choice that emerged during the Renaissance and the Enlightenment periods don't apply anymore. Technology develops at such a speed that the old concepts of individual rights and possibilities become meaningless. For example population control which is needed today is clearly in direct opposition to the idea of freedom, however it's a necessary action in order to save what's left of the biosphere (one of many necessary actions). Another example will be the freedom of trade that is the center of consumerism today. Should we allow people in the developed world to obtain meaningless products or use meaningless services when these collective actions lead to serious problems (pollution among many others)? Of course not!
My point is that if we (eco-fascists and anti-tech radicals) want to reshape this world we need to abandon the old concepts of ethics/morality and embrace new ones that will apply to our revolutionary worldview. | 1 |
| 5 | The tragedy of the commons is involved in population problems in another way[...] Parents who bred too exuberantly would leave fewer descendants, not more, because they would be unable to care adequately for their children[...] If each human family were dependent only on its own resources; if the children of improvident parents starved to death; if, thus, overbreeding brought its own "punishment" to the germ line then there would be no public interest in controlling the breeding of families. But our society is deeply committed to the welfare state, and hence is confronted with another aspect of the tragedy of the commons. In a welfare state, how shall we deal with the family, the religion, the race, or the class (or indeed any distinguishable and cohesive group) that adopts overbreeding as a policy to secure its own aggrandizement? To couple the concept of freedom to breed with the belief that everyone born has an equal right to the commons is to lock the world into a tragic course of action.
Garrett Hardin | 49 |
| 6 | “Never lose hope, be persistent and stubborn and never give up. There are many instances in history where apparent losers suddenly turn out to be winners unexpectedly, so you should never conclude all hope is lost.”
— Theodore J. Kaczynski | 57 |
| 7 | "There will be no "collapse" the way some of these people think of it. It's not going to be like the movie "Dawn of the Dead" or whatever where one day suddenly shit hits the fan and prices skyrocket and everyone begins to riot and the SS comes marching down the street to kill everyone. There will be no "happening." It's far more insidious than that. Read the poem
"The Hollow Men" by TS Eliot and you'll understand.
You'll just notice that every day simple things will become a little more expensive. Everyone's homes and apartments will start to get smaller. Your work hours will get longer, but your pay will decrease. You'll see family and friends less, and find that in time you care less about them. Every day you'll find yourself lowering your standards for everything: work, food, relationships, etc. Job security will no longer exist as a concept. You'll notice houses and apartments shrinking. People will start hanging on to clothing longer and longer. Less people will get married, even less will have children. People will engross themselves in technological distractions and fantasy while never truly experiencing the real world.
Whatever dream people used to have about what their lives were going to be will become for them a distant memory. The only thing left for them will be the reality of their debt and their poverty. And every minute of every day they will be told, "You are stupid, ugly, and weak, but together we are free, prosperous, and safe."
That is the collapse. The reduction of the American man into a feudal serf, incapable of feeling love or hate, incapable of seeing the pitiful nature of his situation for what it is or recognizing his own self worth"
-4chan anon 🍀
AntiTechRevolt❤️ | 59 |
| 8 | Sin texto... | 93 |
| 9 | Sin texto... | 82 |
| 10 | “It seems amazing that those who advocate energy conservation haven’t noticed what happens: As soon as some energy is freed up by conservation, the technological world-system gobbles it up and demands more. …the system always expands rapidly until it is using all available energy, and then it demands still more. …until it reaches a limit imposed by an insufficiency of resources, and then it tries to push beyond that limit regardless of consequences.” - Ted Kaczynski, Anti-Tech revolution | 132 |
| 11 | While there is a baseless hope, or a theory or prediction, that wind- and solar-generated energy will supplant the dirty fuels presently used most, there is absolutely no guarantee of this; were it to happen, it would be contrary to all history of industrial fuels: the access to crude oil (and later refined diesel) did not end the usage of coal, nor did the utilization of oil and gasoline prevent the development of uses for and extraction of natural gas. (Similarly, natural materials which had little utility decades ago have since been put to industrial uses and so are now valued, resulting in the increased destruction or alteration of vast swaths of wild Nature in order to obtain those resource deposits.) So not only has techno-industrial society sought out and laid claim to all available coal, oil, and natural gas accessible beneath our planet’s surface, but now it wants to take the sunlight which lands on the surface and the wind which flows over it, too. Was it forgotten that evolved organisms currently utilize the sunlight which falls on them, or do these non-humans not matter if consideration of them limits Civilization staying electrified? Electricity and expendable fuel consumption has gotten more efficient, but has electricity demand ever diminished in all the time of transition between different fuels? Of course not, and the Jevons Paradox informs us that efficiency increases always bring consumption increases.
- Green Energy Vs Wild Nature | 122 |
| 12 | “The values linked with “progress” have now become the values of another dominating regime: the technoindustrial system that rules the world today. And other new values are emerging that are beginning to challenge in their turn the values of the technoindustrial system. The new values are totally incompatible with technoindustrial values, so that the tension between the two systems of values cannot be relieved. If the new values spread and grow strong enough, the tension will rise to a point at which revolution will be the only possible outcome. And there is reason to believe that the new values will indeed spread and grow stronger.”
— Theodore Kaczynski | 96 |
| 13 | But this ignores the other aspect of the overpopulation debate (cited most commonly by proponents of socialism and deniers of human overpopulation), that the wealthier populations of the ‘Global North’ consume in far greater ratio to their lower populations. In seeking to display their patronizing un-racist egalitarianism, these liberals simultaneously (and schizophrenically) tell us that the wealthy West is consuming far too much (true, agreed) but that to drop the birth rates of Africa and Asia and South America — the ‘black and brown populations’ — all that need be done is to increase their finances relative to the overconsuming and low-populating West. The logical disconnect (or, at best, cognitive dissonance) here is utterly astounding.² the simple biological fact is that the population of any species directly correlates to its food supply, which is adequately provided by Nature and varies by bioregion. Reproducing is natural human behaviour, and should not be interfered with, including agriculture and global food distribution which interferes positively to induce population growth.
This is very true and I'm glad someone finally said it. The idea of equalising economic possibilities of the third worlders with the westerners will only increase consumption and will not solve overpopulation. Quite the contrary, it will make consumption worse, allowing millions more access and ability to produce products and services that end up as waste, polluting our planet. | 112 |
| 14 | Green Energy Vs Wild Nature.pdf | 78 |
| 15 | Sin texto... | 108 |
| 16 | Although it contains a lot of classic 4chan schizo-ramble, I really do believe the full thread is worth reading. OP makes some good points regarding Technology and how algorithms and AI quietly shape human behavior for their own benefit.🤩
AntiTechRevolt❤️ | 114 |
| 17 | An movement called "De-Flock America" has been gaining traction online, with many advocating for the straight up destruction of flock cameras. Halloween of 2026, October 31st has been marked in the calender by so-called "de-flockers" to be a night of action against Flock surveillance cameras.
That this movement has been gaining so much traction proves that the anti-tech sentiment, especially in the US, has been rising in popularity. People are finally starting to understand the gravity of the situation with where modern technology is taking us.
Anti-Tech Apostles | 93 |
| 18 | "[...] To many of us, freedom and dignity are more important than a long life or avoidance of physical pain. Besides, we all have to die some time, and it may be better to die fighting for survival, or for a cause, than to live a long but empty and purposeless life."
-Ted Kaczysnki 🌲
Read ISAIF, TechSlavery and Anti-Tech revolution Today.
AntiTechRevolt❤️ | 86 |
| 19 | "How can anyone think so insanely that the human life has the same value and mankind, the same morality, independent of numbers? It is lucid to me that everytime a new child is born, the value of every human in world decreases slightly. It is obvious to me that the morality of the population explosion is wholly unlike than when man was a sparse, noble species in its beginning." - Pentti Linkola | 142 |
| 20 | Sin texto... | 112 |
