📊 Politically Incorrect Polls
Ir al canal en Telegram
This is a channel about politically incorrect, religious, political & scientific polls. Rules for chatting: No spam No scams No suspicious links No gore or NSFW content No pedophilia Note: You must join the channel to chat, this is to prevent bots, ty
Mostrar más1 797
Suscriptores
-124 horas
+37 días
+1430 días
Archivo de publicaciones
I always see the most retarded shit on Twitter and it always ratios for some reason is it bots or just packs of dindus liking these tweets?
Repost from Pavel Durov
⭐ Happy Chinese New Year!
Following the success of the Chinese startup DeepSeek, many are surprised at how quickly China has caught up with the US in AI. However, China’s progress in algorithmic efficiency hasn't come out of nothing. Chinese students have long outperformed others in math and programming at international olympiads 🏆
When it comes to producing outstanding performers in math and science, China's secondary education system is superior to that of the West. It fosters fierce competition among students, a principle borrowed from the highly efficient Soviet model 🎖
In contrast, most Western schools discourage competition, prohibiting public announcements of students' grades and rankings. The rationale is understandable — to protect students from pressure or ridicule. However, such measures also predictably demotivate the best students. Victory and defeat are two sides of the same coin. Eliminate the losers — and you eliminate the winners ☯️
For many students, motivation to excel in high school comes from treating it as a competitive game, striving to rank first against strong opponents. Removing transparency in student performance can make school feel meaningless for ambitious teenagers. It’s not surprising that many gifted kids now find competitive gaming more exciting than academics — at least in video games, they can see how each player ranks 😵
Telling all students they are champions, regardless of performance, may seem kind — until you consider how quickly reality will shatter this illusion after graduation. Reality, unlike well-meaning school policies, does have public grades and rankings — whether in sports, business, science, or technology. AI benchmarks that demonstrate DeepSeek's superiority are one of such public rankings. And more are coming. Unless the US secondary education system undergoes radical reform, China’s growing dominance in technology seems inevitable 🇨🇳
Rampant homosexuality in modern society is mainly caused by...
Repost from Fragile Communism
What ideology do you align with?
Should anyone who follows Nick Fuentes be completely alienated by the right?
Repost from Lauren Witzke ✝️🇺🇸
ICE is making California Great Again, one raid at a time!
This guy looks like a faot, acts like a faot, sounds like a fa**ot and is out here calling everyone and everything gay and people listen to him for some reason
Will US AI companies recover after the creation of Deepseek? 🇺🇸
Do you think China is telling the truth about the funds and time it took to create Deepseek? (few months, 6 million) 🇨🇳
Should the US do military operations against South American cartels?
Repost from Johan Oosthuizen Research
Highlights:
High IQ Among the "Far-Right": The "far-right" individuals had an average Full Scale IQ of 125.7 (SD = 14.1), markedly above population averages. Contradictory to General Trends: Unlike prior findings of a negative correlation between intelligence and "right-wing" beliefs, this study found high cognitive ability among "far-right" individuals. Minimal Racial IQ Variation: Racial background did not at all predict IQ variation within the far-right, contrary to global patterns, suggesting intelligence is a more significant driver of ideological affiliation. Sexual and Religious Variability: Substantial variations in IQ were observed, particularly among sexes and religious subgroups, with Christian Identitarian & Kinist men scoring highest (average IQ: 140.3) and Völkisch Pagan women scoring lowest (average IQ: 114). Overall, "far-right" men had an average IQ of 126.9 (SD = 12.7), whereas "far-right" women had a substantially lower average of 117.8 (SD = 19.8). Ideological Implications: Findings and memetic analyses suggest high intelligence may not only correlate with but potentially catalyse "far-right" beliefs. Significant Internal Heterogeneity: Demographic and religious sub-groups within the "far-right" showed substantial diversity, against the common perception of a White, Christian, male "far-right".
Repost from Johan Oosthuizen Research
The "Far-Right" Genius: An Investigation into the Intelligence of the "Far-Right", by Johan Oosthuizen.
https://www.academia.edu/125602308/Johan_Oosthuizen_The_Far_Right_Genius_16_11_24_V
PDF attached. May be subject to future updates.
Highlights to follow.
Is the mass deportation plan looking to be promising?
¡Ya disponible! Investigación de Telegram 2025 — los principales insights del año 
