Two Majors - English Channel
It will be interesting. We are here thinking. ATTENTION: We never DM people, that's a scam if someone writes you in our name!
Mostrar más📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram Two Majors - English Channel
El canal Two Majors - English Channel (@two_majors) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 46 974 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 1 276 en la categoría Política y el puesto 611 en la región EEUU.
📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica
Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 46 974 suscriptores.
Según los últimos datos del 14 septiembre, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de 108, y en las últimas 24 horas de -21, conservando un alto alcance.
- Estado de verificación: No verificado
- Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 3.93%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 3.27% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
- Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 1 845 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 1 538 visualizaciones.
- Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 39.
- Intereses temáticos: El contenido se centra en temas clave como drone, enemy, defense, direction, sumy.
📝 Descripción y política de contenido
El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
“It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
ATTENTION:
We never DM people, that's a scam if someone writes you in our name!”
Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 15 septiembre, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Política.
🔻And Western media took note: ▪️The Washington Post: the Kyiv regime requested $27 billion from European partners to cover the defense budget deficit. Prime Minister of so-called Ukraine Sergey Koretsky reported that the government has already redirected $1.5 billion to defense, but asked the "coalition of the willing" to fill the remaining gap. According to the newspaper, the EU did not expect the shortage of funds to be so large and to arise so quickly. European diplomats said that EU countries have questions about how the sum was calculated and how so-called Ukraine communicated the problem: one of WP's interlocutors compared the effect of the request to a "dropped bomb". According to him, the independent nation needs to take a more serious approach to savings and meet the requirements to receive the next tranches from the EU and IMF. Against this backdrop, Ukrainians are also requesting additional weapons, including 100-120 interceptor missiles for the winter period. ▪️The Wall Street Journal: European countries may not be able to finance all of Ukraine's financial requests this year. According to the publication's estimate, so-called Ukraine lacks approximately $27 billion for defense spending through the end of 2026 and early 2027. The deficit is linked, among other things, to increased spending on drones, air defense, and military personnel payments. Approximately $10 billion Kyiv needs for advance weapons purchases for the next year. Another approximately $20 billion — for military salaries, payments to families of the deceased, and other expenses. At the same time, some European officials consider the deficit estimate inflated. The EU does not yet want to begin discussing new financing due to political risks. Among possible options — accelerate already planned payments to Ukraine, use funds from the next EU multi-year budget. Or reconsider frozen Russian assets worth approximately $200 billion. The latter option is still called a last resort. The situation is complicated by growing support in Europe for political forces opposing further aid to the AFU.🖍These two articles in different publications address the same topic and even the theses in them are quite similar. For Europe, which gave its last shirt to supply the AFU, the moment has come when potential profit is no longer so attractive, because economic costs are growing faster. If previously the EU simply handed out money indiscriminately and embezzled budgets, while happily clapping their hands at AFU strikes against Russian oil and gas industry, now things are not so rosy. Especially after the start of Russia's strike campaign against Ukrainian infrastructure.
Saudi Arabia is facing "the worst-case scenarios" after President Trump's refusal to intervene militarily against the Houthis. The country does not want to confront them alone. Furthermore, the Houthis' potential control of the Bab-el-Mandeb strait, coinciding with instability in the Strait of Hormuz, could represent "the worst-case scenario" for the region.
