t e l e p a t h テレパシー能力者 ᓷᓺᓺᕿᔍᕣᒔᖍ
Ir al canal en Telegram
In loving memory of her smile; We will always love you. شاید این قرن یک قرن دلوزی باشد. Gnarly 🌊👾⚡️ radical 🌈🦄🔮♠️👑🌠🌩 on the block I'm magical 🔮✨🌙🕶🎇🔭🌌
Mostrar más894
Suscriptores
+124 horas
+157 días
+8930 días
Carga de datos en curso...
Canales Similares
Nube de Etiquetas
Sin datos
¿Algún problema? Por favor, actualice la página o contacte a nuestro gerente de soporte.
Menciones Entrantes y Salientes
---
---
---
---
---
---
Atraer Suscriptores
julio '26
julio '26
+138
en 1 canales
junio '260
en 8 canales
Get PRO
mayo '260
en 1 canales
Get PRO
abril '260
en 2 canales
Get PRO
marzo '260
en 3 canales
Get PRO
febrero '260
en 3 canales
Get PRO
enero '260
en 12 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '250
en 2 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '25
+45
en 13 canales
Get PRO
octubre '25
+1
en 3 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '250
en 5 canales
Get PRO
agosto '250
en 2 canales
Get PRO
julio '250
en 5 canales
Get PRO
junio '25
+133
en 27 canales
Get PRO
mayo '25
+90
en 20 canales
Get PRO
abril '25
+61
en 11 canales
Get PRO
marzo '25
+44
en 16 canales
Get PRO
febrero '25
+65
en 6 canales
Get PRO
enero '25
+73
en 20 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '24
+76
en 14 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '24
+73
en 5 canales
Get PRO
octubre '24
+86
en 5 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '24
+85
en 13 canales
Get PRO
agosto '24
+175
en 21 canales
Get PRO
julio '24
+130
en 11 canales
Get PRO
junio '24
+162
en 18 canales
Get PRO
mayo '24
+143
en 12 canales
Get PRO
abril '24
+199
en 17 canales
Get PRO
marzo '24
+215
en 17 canales
Get PRO
febrero '24
+285
en 9 canales
Get PRO
enero '24
+324
en 20 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '23
+363
en 14 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '23
+162
en 19 canales
Get PRO
octubre '23
+174
en 22 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '23
+58
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '23
+84
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '23
+144
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '23
+252
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '23
+186
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '23
+434
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '23
+156
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '23
+69
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '23
+14
en 0 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '22
+69
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '22
+12
en 0 canales
Get PRO
octubre '22
+13
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '22
+104
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '22
+107
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '22
+43
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '22
+137
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '22
+309
en 0 canales
| Fecha | Crecimiento de Suscriptores | Menciones | Canales | |
| 30 julio | +2 | |||
| 29 julio | +1 | |||
| 28 julio | +5 | |||
| 27 julio | +2 | |||
| 26 julio | +7 | |||
| 25 julio | +1 | |||
| 24 julio | +7 | |||
| 23 julio | +24 | |||
| 22 julio | +4 | |||
| 21 julio | +4 | |||
| 20 julio | 0 | |||
| 19 julio | +2 | |||
| 18 julio | +4 | |||
| 17 julio | +3 | |||
| 16 julio | +2 | |||
| 15 julio | +9 | |||
| 14 julio | +7 | |||
| 13 julio | +2 | |||
| 12 julio | +1 | |||
| 11 julio | +1 | |||
| 10 julio | +5 | |||
| 09 julio | +4 | |||
| 08 julio | +5 | |||
| 07 julio | +3 | |||
| 06 julio | +7 | |||
| 05 julio | +8 | |||
| 04 julio | +6 | |||
| 03 julio | +5 | |||
| 02 julio | +2 |
Publicaciones del Canal
| 2 | از وقتی دانلودش کردم سالها داشت پایین تپهی آهنگهام خاک میخورد و هیچوقت توجهی بهش نکرده بودم - i mean یه آهنگ نیم ساعته که تگهاش درست نیست، کاور نداره و حتی اسمشو نمیتونی بخونی چیزی نیست که همینجوری رغبت به بررسیش بکنی، درست میگم؟ چند روز پیش در حین مرتب کردن تگهای آهنگهام (کاری که خیلی وقت بود باید انجام میدادم) بهش برخوردم و تگ اسم و آرتیست و کاورش رو درست کردم، ولی باز توجهی بهش نکردم. تا اینکه امشب بعد از Eye in the Sky دنبال یه آلبوم دیگه واسه گوش دادن میگشتم و همینطوری رفتم ته لیستِ الفبایی سراغ اونایی که اسمشون ژاپنی/چینی بود؛ همه رو یا گوش داده بودم یا اگرم نداده بودم میدونستم سبکشون چیه و حس هیچکدوم رو نداشتم. تنها موردی که چیزی ازش نمیدونستم همین بود. یه قطعه موزیک تک و تنها. روش اینتر زدم و منتظر موندم ببینم با چی مواجه میشم. همون دقیقهی اول ازش خوشم اومد و رفتم درموردش سرچ کنم. تقریبا ۶ دقیقه از آهنگ گذشته بود که دیگه نتونستم وبگردی رو ادامه بدم، برگشتم به پلیر و خودمو به اتمسفر آرامشبخشاش سپردم که به هیچیک از تجربیات قبلیم شبیه نبود. اولین بار بود که یه آهنگ اینطور روحم رو بغل میکرد، و سنگینی استرس و اضطراب رو از دوشم برمیداشت.
درست کردن تگ هزاران آهنگ کار پدردربیاریه، چند هفتهست که مشغولشم و هنوز شاید نصفش هم انجام نشده، ولی حالا میفهمم توسعهدهندهی beets چی میگفت:
... importing and correcting the tags for a large library can be an endless, tedious process. ...Maybe it will help to think of it as a tradeoff. By carefully examining every album you own, you get to become more familiar with your library, its extent, its variation, and its quirks. People used to spend hours lovingly sorting and resorting their shelves of LPs. In the iTunes age, many of us toss our music into a heap and forget about it. This is great for some people. But there’s value in intimate, complete familiarity with your collection. So instead of a chore, try thinking of correcting tags as quality time with your music collection. | 155 |
| 3 | در «میل بیپایان» مرزهای مینیمالیسم در ویپرویو به چند فرسنگ دورتر انتقال مییابند: کل ترانه از یک Call and response تشکیل شده است که تنها در نیمه دوم به response زیبا و بسیار رضایتبخش ترانه میرسیم. اگر قرار بود واژه «بیخوابی» (Insomnia) به یک ترانه ترجمه شود قطعا نتیجه چیزی شبیه این اثر میشد.
تحسینبرانگیزترین اثر پروژه Virtual Dream Plaza از نظر بسیاری از طرفداران. | 150 |
| 4 | ❤️ | 156 |
| 5 | Crazy things are happening in Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9FZpboc0I4 | 255 |
| 6 | In course of his career, Zhang gained a great number of nicknames, most of them derogatory:
"Great General of Justice and Might": a title he awarded to himself.
"Old Eighty-Six": The origin of this nickname is unclear. According to rumour it either referred to his height or to the length of his penis
"Three Don't Knows": Based on Zhang's alleged lack of knowledge about how much money he had, how many soldiers he had, and how many women were in his harem.
"72-Cannon Chang": This nickname might also have been connected to the alleged length of his penis.
"The General with three long legs" by Shanghai's prostitutes in reference to his penis' length. | 287 |
| 7 | You tell me to do this,
He tells me to do that.
You're all bastards,
Go fuck your mother.
— "Poem about bastards" credited to Zhang Zongchang | 278 |
| 8 |  Sin texto... | 311 |
| 9 |  Sin texto... | 555 |
| 10 | I think Isaac Asimov is becoming the most important author I have read in years | 280 |
| 11 |  - "Why the need for such perverted Faustian spirit of interplanetary expansion?"
- "BECAUSE IT'S SO MUCH FUN JAN GET IT!!!" | 342 |
| 12 | Science fiction has always been political. Gibson’s Neuromancer was a warning about corporate power, not a pitch deck. Stephenson’s Snow Crash was satire, not strategy. Asimov’s Foundation explored the limits of individual genius and the necessity of democratic institutions. Star Trek imagined overcoming capitalism, not retrofitting it with better spaceships.
This sci-fi orientation has deep roots. In the 1990s, science fiction fans, transhumanists and cypherpunks overlapped in online communities like the Extropians and the Cypherpunks mailing lists, laying conceptual groundwork for technologies like bitcoin long before the 2008 financial crash made cryptocurrency seem necessary. The computer engineer Wei Dai, whose ‘b-money’ proposal directly influenced bitcoin’s design, was active in both communities. The digital future wasn’t being debated in policy circles. It was being imagined in forums where people discussed Vernor Vinge’s 1993 essay on the technological singularity and Neal Stephenson’s Cryptonomicon (1999) – a novel depicting cryptographers creating digital currency – alongside actual code.
Taken together, these cases converge on what I call ‘reactionary futurism’: the deployment of science-fiction aesthetics to advance anti-democratic political projects. It uses the chrome-plated aesthetic of the new to engineer a return to an idealised, brutal past – 19th-century frontier capitalism with radical individualism, unregulated markets, and rejection of democratic governance, but armed with 21st-century drones and algorithms.
Thiel’s 2009 essay makes this explicit. After declaring freedom and democracy incompatible, he concluded: ‘The fate of our world may depend on the effort of a single person who builds or propagates the machinery of freedom that makes the world safe for capitalism.’ Not democracy; capitalism. And not collective effort; a single person. It is the Foundation narrative, the Hari Seldon myth, the lone visionary who sees what the masses cannot – stripped of the democratic institutions Asimov built that myth to defend.
The central question isn’t whether science fiction will shape reality – that process is already underway. The question is: whose version will prevail?
https://aeon.co/essays/silicon-valley-has-a-science-fiction-problem | 325 |
| 13 | This sci-fi orientation has deep roots. In the 1990s, science fiction fans, transhumanists and cypherpunks overlapped in online communities like the Extropians and the Cypherpunks mailing lists, laying conceptual groundwork for technologies like bitcoin long before the 2008 financial crash made cryptocurrency seem necessary. The computer engineer Wei Dai, whose ‘b-money’ proposal directly influenced bitcoin’s design, was active in both communities. The digital future wasn’t being debated in policy circles. It was being imagined in forums where people discussed Vernor Vinge’s 1993 essay on the technological singularity and Neal Stephenson’s Cryptonomicon (1999) – a novel depicting cryptographers creating digital currency – alongside actual code.
Taken together, these cases converge on what I call ‘reactionary futurism’: the deployment of science-fiction aesthetics to advance anti-democratic political projects. It uses the chrome-plated aesthetic of the new to engineer a return to an idealised, brutal past – 19th-century frontier capitalism with radical individualism, unregulated markets, and rejection of democratic governance, but armed with 21st-century drones and algorithms.
Thiel’s 2009 essay makes this explicit. After declaring freedom and democracy incompatible, he concluded: ‘The fate of our world may depend on the effort of a single person who builds or propagates the machinery of freedom that makes the world safe for capitalism.’ Not democracy; capitalism. And not collective effort; a single person. It is the Foundation narrative, the Hari Seldon myth, the lone visionary who sees what the masses cannot – stripped of the democratic institutions Asimov built that myth to defend.
The central question isn’t whether science fiction will shape reality – that process is already underway. The question is: whose version will prevail?
https://aeon.co/essays/silicon-valley-has-a-science-fiction-problem | 1 |
| 14 | sticker.webp | 484 |
| 15 | sticker.webp | 463 |
| 16 | The video game that predicted COVID breakout, 9/11, etc etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cm9ZGgovEiQ | 474 |
| 17 |  Sin texto... | 442 |
| 18 |  Sin texto... | 633 |
| 19 | I'm so lit I can stop a train full of hoes and baddies
They call me Rizz-ali khajavi | 621 |
| 20 |  Is this the most powerful and fearsome diagram of all time? Even simply looking at it is enough to make billions recoil in rage and despair. Just like The Yellow Sign from The King in Yellow, it fills powerless subjects with obsession, paranoia and even madness. It's no wonder some call it a demonic sigil, unleashing chaos over the world. | 622 |
