Was Here.

Hello, does anyone want to play some games with me? (I am Judy, anyway.) 🥰

Anyone? :]

I apologize for making you wait for so long. You are allowed to send your format at precisely 13:10 WIB. Here it goes.

Sudah siap belum...

Do not worry about the originality. 🤓✌️🏻

Boom. :]

Phillos, hello...? Do you all have any idea what is going to pop up? Let’s take a guess. =)

That’s all. Thank you so much, and please get plenty of rest. God’s blessings be with us always. Amen.

For the rest.

We sincerely apologize for the abruptness, but let’s take this as an opportunity to learn more. “A book shouldn’t be judged by its cover.”

Last but not least, aren’t we all mature enough to see what is right and what is wrong? Anything it takes to break their trust is pointless because we are always trying our best to give them anything they desire. Yes, it would be rather pointless to break their whole trust, wouldn’t it? :)

To be honest, there is quite a lot to be recounted, but Isaiah and our friends have already shared part of it. We sincerely apologize for any offending words we have caused, by any chance. However, being able to defend ourselves is not a crime, right? 

Regarding the question you posted on the board, we are genuinely not sure why you are only focusing on it rather than talking about the first channel. We talk a lot here, too, but you are not even talking about it, aren’t you? We really appreciate your desire to ask a question, but it would be preferable if you concluded by having a face-to-face conversation. We have even informed you about our usernames as well, in case you forgot: @Voillant and @Illusoryx, and there is a bot all over the place.

Just to remind you, we may identify countless words for AI patterns, some of which are “akin, adorned, tapestry, realm, unwavering,” and several others. However, just because you see someone else using those words, it doesn’t mean that they are using AI. You may find this one, but it doesn’t always mean that people are using AI when they say things like “I must express my gratitude...” As Isaiah explains, we need to know what Artificial Intelligence is actually capable of. And yet another: we have been using basic English since the beginning. We selected words that are sufficiently easy for us and everyone to understand. Everyone, including you, has the right to use any of those words, don’t you agree? For example, just because you see someone selling flowers in a store, it doesn’t mean another person shouldn’t do the same. It doesn’t mean that other children shouldn’t draw mountains just because you see a little child drawing one.

Even if you only have proof that we use AI by scanning our writing. We have also explained it before. AI itu sistem yang dirancang dari hal yang sudah ada. Dia diprogram untuk satuin hal dari berbagai sumber jadi suatu kesatuan yang baru. Kalau ada hal yang kedetect sama AI, karena memang menurut kami dari awal kami yang mengusung basic words yang notabene nya dipakai sama semua hal yang di dunia. Baik itu poems, jurnal, buku, atau sejenisnya. Kalau ada beberapa kata atau kalimat yang kedeteksi, sesuai apa yang kamu bilang sebelumnya, kami rasa—itu semua karena pure dari pemilihan bahasa yang memang dipakai secara umum. I just wondering, is only AI that able to use poetic, basic and other? Can’t we be more creative than AI? Inaccessible.: I’ve done that, but they only has proof that my written work was created by AI via CHATGPT. They are very sure, because CHATGPT said that it was made by AI. ChatGPT 4 & Midjourney | AI bot: If your friend is relying on the output of an AI tool like ChatGPT to claim that your work was created by AI, you can consider the following steps to address this situation: Explain the limitations of AI tools: AI tools like ChatGPT are designed to generate text based on input data and patterns, but they are not foolproof in determining the origin of written content. It's important to highlight that the output of AI tools should not be taken as definitive proof of authorship. Karena dari kemarin yang dibahas itu adalah AI dari CHATGPT itu. Bahkan CHATGPT sendiri membahas kalau kita gaboleh terpaku sama AI. AI is not accurate. I felt accused, because how could anyone underestimate others based on AI detection. Jadi, guys, please, karena kita pakai kalimat yang basic itu—apa kita termasuk menggunakan AI?

Seperti yang Isa bilang, AI itu mendeteksi daily language yang kita gunakan. Bahkan pas aku coba kalimat acak from my keyboard recommendation, it was still detected as AI. Why? That’s because what I use includes the root language, the daily language that I use. It is important to conclude that AI includes databases from the world.

And for someone who asked why we deleted the board, because previously we had explained it in the bot and even provided proof. However, if your ego is still hungry for our explanation, and you are still curious about whether we use AI or not, of course, we don’t use it. If I say this sentence without proof, everything looks unreal, right? That’s basically inappropriate. I know the gist of it all. Lagipula, penting untuk mengetahui arti dari AI itu sendiri. Dari namanya aja udah kelihatan artificial, which mean itu cuma buatan manusia. Semua pattern yang kami pakai basic karena mereka juga bisa ambil root dari Google. Dan, AI itu memang dibuat oleh manusia. Cuma karena dia pakai pattern yang banyak digunakan orang lain, jadi kalimat basic pun kedetect as AI. So can’t I, we, they, writers, use the same sentence because it will be labeled as artificial by AI?

Bahkan penulis-penulis terkenal sampai Franz Kafka sekalipun, tulisannya bisa ke detect ‘AI made’ loh. Come on.. guys.. Bahasa Inggris itu luas banget, you can’t accuse us, writers, using AI just because we use some words similar to AI’s pattern. Kalau menurut kita kata itu cocok untuk dipakai, ya, kenapa gak boleh? Jangan terlalu berpatok sama AI sampai semuanya dikira buatan AI, I know they are smart but that doesn’t mean humans can not do such things. AI itu isinya data-data dari internet, kalau ada kalimat yang dirasa ‘asing’ or too poetic bakalan dibilang AI made. Contohnya kayak gini; ChatGPT 4 & Midjourney | AI bot: Yes, the text you provided does exhibit characteristics typical of AI-generated content. The poetic language, abstract imagery, and somewhat disjointed structure are common in texts produced by AI language models trained on a diverse range of input data. The use of unique vocabulary and stylistic choices can often be a clue that a text was generated by artificial intelligence. If you have any more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask! “The use of unique vocabulary and stylistic choices can often be a clue that a text was generated by artificial intelligence.” Mereka akan deteksi tulisan itu buatan AI cuma karena ada beberapa kata (unique vocabulary) asing yang dipakai dalam teks tersebut.

Yesterday, me and my friends were talking about this question since it became disturbing for us. Kok bisa menganggap hasil komisi-ku itu AI made? Darimana? Kalau semisal ada bukti akuratnya boleh langsung ke bot Archetch atau @Essaayist aja ya. Getting accused for using AI to write my commission... Duh, agak offensive.. :) I spent hours, even days, until my customers get the writings they deserved. AI itu mendeteksi semua kata yang ‘normal’ digunakan sehari-hari, dan biasanya kalau kalimat itu looks strange/poetic dia bakalan langsung mendeteksi itu bukan buatan manusia. Video diatas menunjukan kalimat se-simple itu yang diketik saat itu juga aja bisa terdeteksi AI made. (Itu ChatGPT ya, kebetulan sendernya ngomongin bot tersebut.) Kalian bisa lihat kalau disitu botnya bilang “AI language model.” apa sih artinya? Kembali lagi ke point awal, that AI was made related to everything around this world. Semua kalimat yang dirasa bukan “bahasa sehari-hari” itu bisa aja terdeteksi sebagai AI made. My sister has tried to detect some famous poet’s poem or writings, and the result is the same. AI nya bilang tulisan mereka itu bukan tulisan manusia. Itu kenapa pakai AI gak boleh tanpa ilmu.