nobulart

https://x.com/nobulart/status/2017513334724075698 "Although we humans have very good reasons for not being comfortable with these catastrophic points of view, it is hard to avoid them if one thinks on the macroscopic level of cosmology or myth. Astrophysics has given us narratives of Big Bangs, Black Holes, colliding galaxies and supernovae, and myth has simply given us different names for these events. In the Middle Earth between science and myth, Rudolph Steiner has left us narratives of cosmic memory that have the “pralayas” or catastrophes that give the punctuated equilibrium of evolution a chance for rest and innovation. At one level, these Gaian catastrophes are tragic and terrifying, but at another level, they are comforting and affirming, for if once “we” were prokaryotic bacteria and dinosaurs, and here “we” are again as hominids lately turned human, then existence is a process in which death is a necessary release from premature crystallizations that would stop time to lock us into an illusion that we thought was reality. Both myth and science seem to agree on an ontology in which the universe is catastrophically transformative, from the supernova of the binary star to the Cretaceous Extinction. If science is telling us the truth, then myth has not been lying to us about the war in heaven." - Imaginary landscape : making worlds of myth and science, William Irwin Thompson (1990), https://archive.org/details/imaginarylandsca00will

The first figure visualizes Mars and Venus during the Underworld saga in their mythological cycle - in solar opposition, demonstrating a remarkable coincidence with Earth's little 'wobbles' every ~6.4 years (note the weak cycle in 2019). Second is a screenshot from an article by Daniel Giamario titled, "A Shamanic Investigation of Venus and Mars." (1997)

Planetary beats and earth rotation: Top: Lomb-Scargle periodogram of the combined torque proxies for Venus and Mars as observed from Earth. The dominant combined period is 6.4 years - 2323 days. Bottom: L-S periodogram of Zω - the DRIFT coupling stability index of the Earths' rotation as measured in the IAU-2000 EOP data going back to 1963 - the dominant is 2323 days. Exactly. [1] whitepaper: https://academia.edu/167254837/DRIFT_A_Constraint_First_Polar_Motion_Diagnostic_System_Whitepaper_for_version_1_6_4 [2] github: https://github.com/nobulart/drift (DRIFT is no longer being hosted on my dime, but anyone can install and run it locally) [3] Figure is from "Evidence". https://x.com/nobulart/status/2105346415983477169?s=20

"Hopi tradition has Baholihonga turn "the world upside down" so that "great chasms formed in the earth," and water came up through the kivas and through the fireplaces in the houses, covering everything but one muddy ridge. The detail is precise about interior emergence points: water rising inside sealed dwellings, not falling on them. Luiseno of southern California recall "heavy rain began pouring down, and water gushed from the broken ground," swelling the rivers - a dual source that mirrors Genesis~7:11's structure in a tradition with no Semitic contact. The Ami of eastern Taiwan compress the whole claim into one clause: "in an earthquake, mountains tumbled down, the earth gaped, and hot subterranean waters gushed out and flooded the whole earth." An Australian Gunwinggu account pairs rising water with liquefaction: "water came up from underneath,'' and the people could not flee because "the ground became soft'' before it covered them. These are scattered across every inhabited continent except Africa - Pacific-rim, Americas, Near East. They recur in traditions too far apart to borrow from one another, which is what makes direction a datum rather than an image: a rain-flood cannot explain why so many peoples remember the water arriving from underneath. Most of these accounts arise near known large, confined aquifers and volcanic provinces: the Hopi on the Colorado Plateau, where a shallow aquifer meets the San Francisco Peaks field; the Gunwinggu on the margin of the Great Artesian Basin; the eastern-Taiwan Ami inside an active collision zone. Confined aquifers under pressure can discharge at the surface without pumping when something changes their head - and magmatic heat is one thing that changes it. The mechanism that connects them is established in the geological record at large-igneous-province scale. In the Karoo Basin, sill intrusions heated aquifer pore fluids until "rapid pore pressure build-up" drove phreatic eruptions - pipe-like vents up to several hundred metres across piercing the basin's strata, formed before the main flood-basalt phase. In the Siberian Tunguska Basin, sills emplaced within Cambrian evaporites produced degassing pipes and crater-lake deposits up to 700~m deep. These are magma-aquifer contact forcing subterranean water and steam to the surface - exactly the class of event a tradition might compress into "the earth gaped and water came up."" Excerpt from "Evidence"

121 copies and 22 days remain. https://buymeacoffee.com/nobulart/e/574800

The Ȟāl Saflieni Hypogeum, Malta. Another possible ECDO Np' obsequence. Underground. https://x.com/nobulart/status/2107461045032034590?s=20

Now taking pre-orders. Delivery of signed copies of 'evidence' are planned for early December (at the same 15%-discounted price for the first month): https://buymeacoffee.com/nobulart/e/574800

The Sibylline Battle of the Stars and Phaethon “Two mighty meteors — of sun- and moon-like apparent size and shape — appear threateningly with their accompaniments. The star-world falls into turmoil, and the actual war begins: the Morning Star (Venus) opens it, standing on the back of Leo. Seven months later a new heaven results, as the Sun moves from about mid-Virgo to mid-Aries. The stars that ruled the dawning morning sky plunge at last into Okeanos and set the earth afire. Such is the fundamental thought — recognized only once facts beneath poetry’s veil are laid bare.” https://nobulart.com/the-sibylline-battle-of-the-stars-and-phaethon/

The Turkish Underground The discovery forced a rewrite of what archaeologists thought they knew about underground construction in the ancient world. Before 1963, the largest known subterranean complexes were the Roman catacombs and the Basilica Cistern in Istanbul. Derinkuyu alone could hold twenty thousand people. Kaymaklı, nine kilometres away, was larger still. The two were probably connected by a tunnel whose ventilation shafts have since been filled with rubble. https://nobulart.com/the-turkish-underground/

Who's Afraid of Open-Weights? https://x.com/nobulart/status/2099776525453103499

Mach-TPW coherence experiment preliminary results: For the past six weeks I've been running a simple test with the oceanographic physics model: simulate rapid true polar wander along many different rotational paths and ask, do the resulting flows preferentially agree with the Mach-field geometry? 483 shallow-water simulations across 38 Euler axes spanning 360° of longitude were scored. The coherence between the Groundtruth geometry and the simulated rotations is significantly more pronounced for rotations along ~60°E than along any other axis. DRAFT: Simulated Flow-Topography Alignment: A Mach-Field Cohort Experiment https://academia.edu/173345159/Simulated_Flow_Topography_Alignment_A_Mach_Field_Cohort_Experiment Github: https://github.com/nobulart/mach Rapid TPW SImulation Project: https://x.com/nobulart/status/2078959840421142941?s=20 /

Nakajima et al. (1973) describe a "Very Short Period Geomagnetic Excursion 18,000 yr BP" from paleomagnetic study of proxies from the bed of Lake Biwa-ko in Japan and ancient Australian fireplaces. The VGP paths derived describe a southward magnetic pole traversal along a corridor running between 30E and 60E, with a ±180 degree declination oscillation, over an estimated 1,100-year duration. Nakajima et al., Very Short Period Geomagnetic Excursion 18,000 yr BP (1973) https://nature.com/articles/physci244008a0 1 Nakajima et al., Very Short Period Geomagnetic Excursion 18,000 yr BP (1973) https://nature.com/articles/physci244008a0

"Dr. Laurence M. Gould, who was chief scientist of the 1928 Byrd Expedition, informed the National Science Foundation from Antarctica of the recent fossil find, which he and a fellow geologist pronounced “not only the most important fossil ever found in Antarctica but one of the truly great fossil finds of all time.” The find was made by an Ohio State University group under the direction of Dr. David H. Elliot." The 22-foot-long, meat-eating crested dinosaur is named Cryolophosaurus ellioti. Charles Neder, Antarctica: authentic accounts of life and exploration in the world's highest, driest, windiest, coldest and most remote continent (1973 ed.) https://archive.org/details/antarcticaauthen0000neid https://beyondpenguins.ehe.osu.edu/issue/learning-from-the-polar-past/a-dinosaur-cast-in-stone

McMurtry et al. (2007) reported coral-bearing marine shell conglomerate sitting more than 20 metres above today's sea level, in Bermuda and the Bahamas, and tens of metres back inside karst caves. For years the textbook reading has been a Middle Pleistocene highstand during MIS 11, ~360-420 ka. The authors went back and found that the setting, the sediment relations, and the microfauna don't fit long, quiet intertidal deposition at all. Their interpretation is wave-carried debris flung deep into caves by a late-Quaternary megatsunami. The mechanism they point to is volcanic-island flank collapse. What's notable is that the deposits sit on more than one island, as expected from a regional source rather than a local storm. Hearty & Olson argue the same beds are better explained by a transient highstand, not a tsunami, and note the comparative sedimentology against known megatsunami deposits wasn't done. The anomaly is real, the cause is contested. McMurtry et al. (2007), "Elevated marine deposits in Bermuda record a late Quaternary megatsunami," Sedimentary Geology 200(3-4):155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2006.10.009 Hearty & Olson (2008), "Mega-highstand or megatsunami? Discussion of McMurtry et al. (Elevated marine deposits in Bermuda record a late Quaternary megatsunami: Sed. Geol. 200 (2007) 155-165)," Sedimentary Geology 203(3-4):307-312. DOI:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.08.001

"It was clear at that time to several of us that the relatively easy problem of sampling a few hundred meters of soft pelagic sediment on the sea floor was likely to be one of the most rewarding experiments available to scientists, and we ignored the possibility that the selection of sites could be very difficult to decide or very important for the final yield of the experiment. A few of us now know how dangerously oversimplified that view was. The first indications were the discovery of submarine erosion on continental slopes and in submarine canyons, and the deposition of reworked sediments on abyssal plains. The proof that turbidity currents are responsible for widespread reworking of sediments sounded the alarm. The thinness of sediment cover everywhere, particularly on the mid-oceanic ridges has stimulated speculations (such as those of Dietz, Hess, and others) that convection in the mantle has systematically carried large fractions of the total area of oceanic crust beneath continents and replaced it by newly created ocean floor. This has cast further doubt about how far back we may investigate the geologic record by means of oceanic sediments. The seismic reflection profiler has provided the means for answering many of the pertinent questions, and for choosing drilling sites far more wisely than was previously possible. It has revealed inequalities in sediment thickness which until now defied detailed explanation either by crustal transport or by any pattern of submarine transport yet thought of. It has, in fact, raised such serious problems in this area that their solution may equal in importance the original one of obtaining a (fairly) complete geologic section of oceanic sediment and fossils." Ewing (1963), Sediments at proposed LOCO drilling sites, https://doi.org/10.1029/jz068i001p00251

The Utter Elegance of ECDO Theory If only the crust displaces, where do we derive the anisotropy necessary to substantiate the 175 sudden cataclysm traditions? The crust, oceans, polar ice, etc., are not even 1% of the way to sufficiency in this regard. And if the Earth's architecture involves one integral object with no decoupling potential, how would we ever observe two rotational states to begin with, as the monuments so clearly demonstrate? The geophysical answer is constrained to somewhere between those bookends, and only the core-mantle boundary contains all five geophysical factors necessary for a decoupling. This decoupling mechanism must also explain, and function in concert with, rapid climate change. Thus one can perceive the utter elegance of ECDO Theory. It resolves every current geophysical, cultural, and climate challenge at an optimal logical saddle point. @EthicalSkeptic

What if the most crucial thought an AI considers is the one it doesn’t act on immediately? HUM is an experimental slow-cognition architecture for agents. Unfinished observations, associations, contradictions, and repeated behavioural corrections are captured in a temporary DREAMS layer, not interrupting the current task. A later surfacing process ranks them by recurrence, relevance, provenance, and potential utility; promising fragments move into conscious evaluation, where they are tested, contradicted, acted on, dismissed, or carried forward. Only fragments that survive this waking scrutiny can enter persistent memory, and changes to the agent’s governing principles remain explicitly reviewed, never automatic. Not machine consciousness. Not AGI. A disciplined architecture for incubation, reflection, memory consolidation, and controlled forgetting. Github : https://github.com/nobulart/hum Whitepaper : https://github.com/nobulart/hum/blob/main/docs/HUM_Whitepaper.pdf

Contextual analysis of the past week (and month) of 5+ seismic activity using USGS worldwide data from 1970 until today. Not out of the envelope, but right on the edge of it in some metrics. "The 22-28 June 2026 high-energy week. The week from 22-28 June 2026 contains 32 M5+ events, 5 M6+ events, and 2 M7+ events. Its raw event count is not extreme, ranking only around the 67.7th percentile of weekly windows. However, the week is unusual by large-event content and moment release: it is at approximately the 99.3th percentile by M7+ count and 95.0th percentile by cumulative weekly moment." Full analysis: https://nobulart.com/media/quakes.pdf

Mark any location on the map. If the ring passes the intake criteria, it will be automatically analysed and ranked for morphology, gravity, magnetics and other factors, and assigned a follow-up score. High follow-up's are sites considered most worth exploring for impact/shock signatures. astro.nobulart.com

The Astrobleme Review Atlas provides an interface to explore the project datasets, and to contribute new candidates for review, comparison and ranking using the paper's methodology and results. http://astro.nobulart.com Open-sourced discovery. Live: https://astro.nobulart.com (alpha release - many improvements already in the pipeline) Code: https://github.com/nobulart/astrobleme Draft: https://academia.edu/169033486/Arcuate_Geometries_and_Terrestrial_Impact_Structures_An_Exploratory_Geospatial_and_Null_Model_Analysis