LAW Notes Llb Notes Judiciary Notes
Ir al canal en Telegram
Law Notes Available here English & Hindi. Contact @Avanishbly
Mostrar más
Red:📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram LAW Notes Llb Notes Judiciary Notes
El canal LAW Notes Llb Notes Judiciary Notes (@law_notes_llb_notes) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 22 570 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 8 727 en la categoría Educación y el puesto 18 241 en la región India.
📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica
Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 22 570 suscriptores.
Según los últimos datos del 01 septiembre, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de 13, y en las últimas 24 horas de 3, conservando un alto alcance.
- Estado de verificación: No verificado
- Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 6.74%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 1.11% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
- Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 1 520 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 251 visualizaciones.
- Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 2.
- Intereses temáticos: El contenido se centra en temas clave como judiciary, judge, supreme, act, upsc.
📝 Descripción y política de contenido
El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
“Law Notes Available here English & Hindi.
Contact @Avanishbly”
Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 02 septiembre, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Educación.
22 565
Suscriptores
+324 horas
+97 días
+1330 días
Archivo de publicaciones
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🆘 99% of Judiciary Exam Challenges Can Be Solved.
Facing a problem in your Judiciary preparation?
CHALLENGE US 🔥
Whatever is stopping you from cracking Judiciary :-
📚 Concepts?
📝 Answer Writing?
⚖️ Bare Acts?
🎯 Strategy?
⏳ Revision?
😰 “I don’t know where to start?”
Bring us your problem. We’ll show you the solution. Challenge us. We’ll help you find the solution. 💪
📲 WhatsApp us your problem:
+919889883719
💬 FREE Mentorship Session REGISTER BELOW 👇👇👇
https://forms.gle/qYoWoN6KWrUJdNgv5
☎️ WhatsApp: +919889883719
✉️ Email: support@edzorblaw.com
🔜 Join @Edzorblaw ✅
Gratitude. Naman ♥️
Team EdzorbRepost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
+2
There’s no one way to celebrate Raksha Bandhan ♥️
Celebrate the sibling bond the way you want to. Do it.
With love. With laughter. With support. With a gift that says, “I believe in you.” 🫶
This Rakhi, gift your sibling more than just a thread 🎁
Gift them the Edzorb Law PREMIUM+ Course because sometimes the best way to support someone’s dream is to help them prepare for it. ⚖️
Rakhi isn’t just about protection. It’s about being there, believing in each other, and helping each other grow. This Rakhi, gift their preparation.
Gift their preparation. Gift their dream. SAVE Rs 5000 today 🎁 Edzorb Law PREMIUM+
For the sibling who’s preparing to wear the robe. ⚖️
Happy Raksha Bandhan! 🌿
☎️ For Any Queries, WhatsApp us: +919889883719, +919685513769
With ♥️
Team Edzorb
PS: Send this message to your sibling as a hint 😉
Repost from Edzorb Law Official™© ️
Bhumika Trust v. Union of India & Connected Cases
W.P.(C) No. 001110/2025 & Connected Cases
3-year practice rule upheld: Supreme Court refused to reconsider the fundamental requirement of prior legal experience before entering judicial service.
Transition period: Candidates applying under notifications issued from May 25, 2025 to March 31, 2027 can apply without prior practice.
Deemed 1-year practice: Such candidates will be deemed to have completed 1 year of active practice and need not produce a practice certificate for that period.
After selection: They will be appointed as Trainee Judicial Officers.
1-year Judicial Academy training: They must undergo 1 year of intensive training at the concerned State Judicial Academy.
1-year clerkship: After training, they must complete 1 year of structured law clerkship:
6 months under the Principal District Judge / Higher Judicial Service.
6 months under sitting judges of the concerned High Court.
Evaluation: A High Court judge supervising the trainee will submit a reasoned evaluation report on progress and suitability.
Regular appointment: On satisfactory evaluation, the trainee will be appointed to the regular post and receive regular pay and service benefits.
From April 1, 2027: Candidates must have at least 1 year of active legal practice to appear for Civil Judge (Junior Division) examinations.
Practice verification: The 1-year practice must be supported by a certificate of practice, based on recorded presence and participation in effective judicial proceedings.
Training after April 1, 2027: Selected candidates will still undergo:
1 year Judicial Academy training
6 months clerkship under District & Sessions Judge / Higher Judicial Service
6 months clerkship under a sitting High Court judge
Training remuneration: During training, Trainee Judicial Officers will receive 50% of the gross remuneration payable to a Judicial Magistrate First Class.
Reason for limited relaxation: Court held that sudden restoration of the 3-year rule, without transitional arrangements, caused hardship to young lawyers and law graduates.
Core reasoning retained: Court maintained that exposure to the legal profession before joining the judiciary has a reasonable nexus with judicial service.
Important: The Court did not reconsider the requirement of prior legal experience; it only provided a limited transitional arrangement.
Bench: CJI Surya Kant, Justice August George Masih, and Justice K. Vinod Chandran (dissenting).
Fill the Google Form for FREE MENTORSHIP 👇 https://forms.gle/qYoWoN6KWrUJdNgv5
🔥 Join for Latest Updates: https://t.me/edzorblaw
☎️ For any queries, whatsapp, +919889883719
With ♥️
Team Edzorb
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2026
✔️ Presidential assent:– 7th April, 2026; Amendments made in 79 Central Acts of 23 Ministries.
✔️Total 784 provisions amended:- For minor procedural lapses, criminal penalties replaced with civil/administrative penalties.
✔️Key Objectives:- Ease of Living, simplifying compliance and reducing unnecessary criminal prosecution for minor offences.
✔️Provision:– Warning for first-time minor errors, proportionate penalties based on severity, and faster resolution mechanism.
✔️This reform is the next phase of the Jan Vishwas Act, 2023:- In 2023, 183 provisions of 42 Central Acts were decriminalized.
#UPSC #UPPCS #Prelims #Mains #Notes
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🆘🔥 LIVE NOW Free RJS APO Prelims Simulator Mock @EdzorbLaw App.
🏄 REGISTER, Attempt NOW, HURRY NOW: https://app.edzorb.in/products/free-rjs-apo-prelims-simulator-mock/
⚠️ The window is open for 24 hours only.
With ♥️
Team Edzorb
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🇮🇳 LAST DAY to SAVE Rs 4000 on the Premium+ course.
☎️ For Coupon Codes, WhatsApp us 🤙 at +919889883719 || +919685513769
✉️ Join 🔜 @Edzorblaw ✅
With ♥️
Team Edzorb
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🇮🇳🇮🇳 80वें स्वतंत्रता दिवस की हार्दिक शुभकामनायें 🇮🇳🇮🇳
🇮🇳🇮🇳Heartfelt wishes on the 80th Independence Day 🇮🇳🇮🇳
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🌐Law Notes
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9FXaFLtOj4W4BrLs3h
🌐Constitution
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaBQVoRF1YlLNQdj502C
🌐Law Students
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb5qvAuBadmb3FTIll1e
🌐UP Judiciary
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va4Jow7BKfhtL08i1R0r
🌐Recent Case Law
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbB6CXh8fewqGQwajr2J
🌐Law For Civil Services
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VasTfge1Xquf4u0M7f0j
🌐Law Pdfs
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb5n2yY1nozEJ0dptH1O
🌐Indian Law
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6EraoDZ4LedEPMOP2p
🌐Law Mcqs
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb5xo9C6mYPSu5iguM0M
Join US
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
_*Limitation Periods*_
1. The time for filing First Appeal in civil cases is 30 days.
2. The time for filing Second Appeal in civil cases is 60 days.
3. The time for filing civil revision is 90 days.
4. The limitation period for appeal in Capital Punishment is 7 days.
5. The limitation period of appeal from Magistrate to Sessions Court is 30 days.
6. The limitation period of appeal from Sessions Court to High Court is 60 days.
7. The limitation period of appeal from the High Court to the Supreme Court is 30 days.
8. The limitation period of appeal from High Court to Supreme Court in special Leave to Appeal is 30 days.
9. The limitation period of appeal from Magistrate to High Court in acquittal in Challan Case is 30 days and in Complaint Case 60 days.
10. The limitation period of appeal from Sessions Court to High Court in acquittal in Challan Case is 30 days and in Complaint Case 60 days.
11. The limitation period of appeal from High Court when case decide by it in its original jurisdiction and to Division Bench than 20 days in acquittal or conviction as the case may.
12. The Plaintiff has a time of 6 years to file execution.
13. The limitation in civil suits is 3 years from the cause of action.
14. The Article 150 Appeal from death sentence to High Court is 7 days.
15. Article 151. High Court Order on original side, appeal is 20 days.
16. Article 154. Appeal to any Court other than High Court is 30 days.
17. Article 155. Criminal appeal to High Court is 60 days.
18. Article 157. Appeal from acquittal by State is 6 months.
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
34. *Principle of Collective Responsibility* – All members of the government are unanimous in support of its policies and actions. *(Article 75)*
35. *Principle of Individual Responsibility* – Each minister is responsible to the legislature for every action taken or omitted in his ministry. *(Article 75)*
36. *Sine Die* – Means without any future date being designated. *(Article 85)*
37. *Ad Hoc* – Means for the special purpose. *(Article 127)*
38. *Nunc Pro Tunc* – Means now for then. *(Article 136)*
39. *Stare Decisis* – Means to stand by precedents. *(Article 141)*
40. *Obiter Dicta* – Refers to observations made by a judge which are not essential for decision. (*Article 141)*
41. *Ratio Decidendi* – Means the reason for the decision given by the court. *(Article 141)*
42. *Principle of Consistency of Law* – A division bench ought to follow the earlier decision of a larger bench. *(Article 141)*
43. *Boni Judicis Est Ampliare Jurisdictionem* – Means it is part of a good judge to enlarge his jurisdiction. *(Article 226)*
44. *Theory of Territorial Nexus* – The State Legislature cannot make extra-territorial laws except when there is sufficient connection between the State and the subject matter. *(Article 245)*
45. *Plenary Power of Legislature* – Refers to the absolute power to enact laws, subject to constitutional limits. *(Article 246)*
46. *Ancillary or Incidental Power* – Means power to legislate on incidental or ancillary matters related to the main subject. *(Article 246)*
47. *Doctrine of Pith and Substance* – Used to determine the true nature or object of a legislation. *(Article 246)*
48. *Doctrine of Colorable Legislation* – Means what cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly. *(Article 246)*
49. *Bona Vacantia* – Refers to goods without an owner. *(Article 296)*
50. *Doctrine of Eminent Domain* – Refers to the right of the State to acquire private property for public use with compensation. *(Article 300A)*
51. *Imperium in Imperio* – Means a sovereignty within a sovereignty. *(Article 324)*
52. *In Foro Conscientiae* – Means in the form of conscience. *(Article 363)*
53. *Doctrine of Basic Structure* – States that the power of amendment cannot be exercised to take away or destroy the basic structure of the Constitution. *(Article 368)*..
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
📘 *LIST OF DOCTRINES - THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA*
1. *Ejusdem Generis* – Means of the same kind. *(Article 12)*
2. *Ab Initio* – Means for the very beginning. *(Article 13)*
3. *Doctrine of Judicial Review* – A law is declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court or High Court if it contravenes any of the Fundamental Rights. *(Articles 13, 32, 226)*
4. *Doctrine of Eclipse* – The law which contravenes Fundamental Rights is not void ab initio; it remains in a morbid condition and unenforceable. It is not totally wiped out from the statute book. *(Article 13)*
5. *Doctrine of Severability* – The whole law is not void under Article 13; only that portion which contravenes Fundamental Rights is void, and the rest remains operative. *(Article 13)*
6. *Doctrine of Rule of Law* – It means supremacy of law and absence of arbitrary power. *(Article 14)*
7. *Principle of Reasonable Classification* – Equals cannot be treated unequally and unequals cannot be treated equally. *(Article 14)*
8. *Audi Alteram Partem* – Means no one should be condemned unheard. *(Articles 14, 21, 22)*
9. *Wednesbury Principle* – Used to adjudge the discretion provided to the executive under the statute. *(Article 14)*
10. *Lex Non a Rege Est Violanda* – Means the law must not be violated even by the king. *(Article 14)*
11. *Pari Passu* – Means on equal footing. *(Article 14)*
12. *Rex Quod Injustum Est Facere Non Potest* – Means the king cannot do what is unjust. *(Article 14)*
13. *Principle of Proportionality of Restrictions* – Restrictions should not be arbitrary or beyond what is required for achieving the object. *(Article 19)*
14. *Ex Post Facto* – A law which imposes penalty retrospectively. *(Article 20)*
15. *Double Jeopardy* – No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. *(Article 20)*
16. *Nemo Debet Bis Vexari Pro Una et Eadem Causa* – Means a man shall not be vexed twice for one and the same cause. *(Article 20)*
17. *Nemobis Punitur Pro Eodem Delicto* – Means no one can be punished twice for the same offence. *(Article 20)*
18. *Autrefois Convict* – Refers to a defendant’s plea that he has already been tried and convicted for the same offence. *(Article 20)*
19. *Nova Constitutio Futuris Formam Imponere Debet, Non Praeteritis* – Means a new law ought to be prospective and not retrospective in operation. *(Article 20)*
20. *Doctrine of Self-Incrimination* – No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. *(Article 20)*
21. *Nemo Tenetur Prodere Accusare Seipsum* – Means no man is bound to accuse himself. *(Article 20)*
22. *Nemo Punitur Pro Alieno Delicto* – Means no one is to be punished for the crime or wrong of another. *(Article 20)*
23. *Ubi Jus Ibi Remedium* – Means where there is a right, there is a remedy. *(Article 21)*
24. *Doctrine of Rarest of the Rare* – Death penalty can only be given in rarest of rare cases. *(Article 21)*
25. *Doctrine of Public Trust* – Natural resources like air, water, etc. are meant for general use and cannot be limited by private ownership. *(Article 21)*
26. *Precautionary Principle* – The State and authorities must prevent and attack causes of environmental degradation. *(Article 21)*
27. *Polluter Pays Principle* – One who carries on hazardous activities is liable to make good the loss caused to another. *(Article 21)*
28. *Habeas Corpus* – Means you shall have the body. *(Articles 32, 226)*
29. *Locus Standi* – Refers to the right of a party to bring an action before the court. *(Articles 32, 226)*
30. *Mandamus* – Means we command. *(Articles 32, 226)*
31. *Quo Warranto* – Means by what authority. *(Articles 32, 226)*
32. *Certiorari* – A writ by which a higher court reviews a case tried in a lower court. *(Articles 32, 226)*
33. *Doctrine of Distributive Justice* – Ensures economic justice to minimize inequalities and promote welfare of the people. *(Articles 38, 39)*
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🌐Judicial Services
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va4Kw1972WTv8QxTPr0M
🌐Indian Judiciary
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va98EuXB4hdTXjjCWK2n
🌐Indian Law
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb61Cng7oQhhYZCrLQ2Y
🌐Indian Judicial Services
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb5ZK8o8aKvIg9SynB1U
🌐Judiciary Interview
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6HWg0Lo4hWfPbVk21d
🌐Judiciary
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb69u7s7tkjGBJNqex03
🌐All State Judiciary
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6HfXMK0IBry6yITJ29
🌐Assistant Professor
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbCyvrzHltY6WYWl1y3G
🌐Law & Polity Notes
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbD3Ri0JJhzWUFt57l0P
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
*🛡️Public Accounts Committee(PAC)*
♟️It is a financial parliamentary committee.
♟️It was set up first in 1921 under Government of India act 1919.
♟️It consists of 22 members (15-Lok Sabha , 7- Rajya Sabha). A minister cannot be its member.
♟️The term of office of the members is one year. The members are elected by the Parliament every year from amongst its members.
♟️Its chairman is appointed by Speaker of LS.
*💎FUNCTION :*
♟️To examine the annual audit reports of the CAG. CAG acts as a guide, friend, philosopher of the committee.
*💎Limitations :*
♟️It is not concerned with the questions of policy in broader sense.
♟️Its recommendations are advisory and not binding on the ministries.
♟️It conducts a post-mortem examination of accounts.
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
*A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950)* – Personal liberty under Article 21.
*Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)* – Basic Structure Doctrine.
*I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967)* – Amendability of Fundamental Rights.
*Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)* – Expanded the scope of Article 21.
*S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)* – Federalism and misuse of Article 356.
*Indira Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)* – Reservations and the Mandal Commission.
*K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017)* – Right to Privacy.
*Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018)* – Decriminalization of homosexuality.
*Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017)* – Triple Talaq invalid.
*Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980)* – Reaffirmed the Basic Structure Doctrine
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
*🛡️Fast-track Courts*
♟️ *Purpose* Established to address the backlog of criminal cases, especially heinous crimes against women and children.
♟️ *Challenges:* Resource limitations, inefficient investigations, insufficient staff, and limited scope of jurisdiction.
♟️ *Performance* Despite initial increase in functional courts, many states struggle to maintain them due to financial and administrative constraints.
♟️Need for Reform: States must prioritize their operation, ensure necessary resources, improve investigations, and leverage technology.
*💎Visual Summary Analysis*
♟️Chart 1: Shows the increasing burden on the judiciary due to the rising number of criminal cases.
♟️Chart 2: Indicates the initial enthusiasm but subsequent decline in the establishment and maintenance of fast-track courts.
♟️Chart 3: Depicts the uneven distribution of functional courts across different states, highlighting the disparity in access to justice.
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
🌐Law Notes
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va9FXaFLtOj4W4BrLs3h
🌐Constitution
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaBQVoRF1YlLNQdj502C
🌐Law Students
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb5qvAuBadmb3FTIll1e
🌐UP Judiciary
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va4Jow7BKfhtL08i1R0r
🌐Recent Case Law
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbB6CXh8fewqGQwajr2J
🌐Law For Civil Services
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VasTfge1Xquf4u0M7f0j
🌐Law Pdfs
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb5n2yY1nozEJ0dptH1O
🌐Indian Law
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6EraoDZ4LedEPMOP2p
🌐Law Mcqs
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb5xo9C6mYPSu5iguM0M
Join US
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
*🛡️LEADER OF THE HOUSE OF THE OPPOSITION*
♟️In each House of Parliament, there is the ‘Leader of the Opposition’. The leader of the largest Opposition party having not less than one-tenth seats of the total strength of the House is recognised as the leader of the Opposition in that House.
♟️In a parliamentary system of government, the leader of the opposition has a significant role to play. His main functions are to provide a constructive criticism of the policies of the government and to provide an alternative government. Therefore, the leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha were accorded statutory recognition in 1977.
♟️They are also entitled to the salary, allowances and other facilities equivalent to that of a cabinet minister.
♟️It was in 1969 that an official leader of the opposition was recognised for the first time. The same functionary in USA is known as the ‘minority leader’.
Repost from Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J
Follow the Praveen Kumar | The Unreasonable Man channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va6jw6r7tkj8TB3xAO1A
