APS Channel 氣功治療

出門之前停一停 諗下自己有咩需要做 遇上任何情況果時要有咩要應對 Be water my friend 🙇🏼‍♂️

#寶寶提醒 #七一🟡 今日出去shopping嘅寶寶們 出門前記得睇清楚準備好晒啲野未 萬事小心

Yesterday, the Chinese communist physically raped Suzie Wong by passing the “Party Security Law”. When the pro-government avaricious belligerent imbeciles began to realize that come September, the Hong Kong people are determined to take over the legislature and kick out all the pro-government legislature members, they ran to Beijing and cried for help. The think tank in Beijing came up with this brilliant idea: A communist security law. Just by talking about making such a law will cause major waving effects in the stock market. Those trading with computer software can buy and sell thousands of transactions in a few seconds. Any excuse to rock the boat will be a chance to make millions of dollars. And a Party Security Law will not only protect the communist party, it will also give the HK government the exclusive power to arrest, jail, rape, sell the body parts and make disappear of any dissidents in Hong Kong. Although this is an absolute bridge of the British China Joint Declaration, and the end of the one country two system rules of the Basic Law, the Chinese communist are notoriously disrespectful towards laws that restrict their unruly behaviour. (just ask any police who has ever giving out a ticket to one of the Chinese communist in Canada, or anywhere in the world). Canada, and the world, is watching the Communist bully raping Hong Kong in broad daylight. It is anybody’s responsibility to reach out and offer Suzie Wong a hand, a chance to get away and survive. We boast how we do that for bears, dears, eagles, birds, dogs and cats. What are se going to do for humans in Hong Kong? What do we mean when we speak with our children about human rights? #CIA, #MI6, #CSIS, #ASIS, #DGSE, #RAW, #BND, #SVR, #Mossad

admin會當值 可以去 @AllPeopleSpontaneous_bot 搵我哋

#純屬9up 當初，我地唔係要抗惡法咩？所謂嘅引渡條例 我仲好記得 我哋叫佢做「送終」 大家決定去上街頭 後來理大一役 大家面臨最接近全民勇武嘅一日 但唔知幾時 有部分人開始淨係識好嬲好嬲 而加黨安法黎到 有部分人都已經「心理送終」 We will be back I am back you are back You, are backed Will you be back? When will we be back?

啊啊啊啊啊好驚啊好驚啊，國安法殺到！要quit喇要quit喇，private曬所有野佢！屌你老味day one 你就應該知會咁啦🙂香港人反抗未啊😚😚😚

The national security Bill is one of the ways how #ccp would clamp down on those that disobey. If you think that’s far from you you’re wrong. Canda is also invaded by the regime. #ccpinvasion_canada #ccpinvasion #boycottChina — #english #DIYms

重點 16條:政治部再臨 20條:所有香港前途自決收皮 24條:全部勇武當恐怖活動 26條:全部支持勇武嘅組織收皮(包物資站同612） 27條:所有文宣可以收皮 29條:同外國政黨有聯繫嘅收皮 38條:國安法適用於所有喺香港嘅人 41條:審判有權唔俾公眾聆聽 43條:調查期間有權使用所有手法 55條:香港政府可以將你送中 60條: 國安人員喺香港不受任何執法機關限制 https://www.gld.gov.hk/egazette/pdf/20202444e/cs220202444136.pdf

【國安法強行通過：法治已死】 就在今日，中共強行通過不知內容的國安法，作為一個法律從業員，一個執業20多年的大律師，我再不能同大家說，我對於在體制內爭取法治重光尚有希望，我很沉重及凝重地向大家宣布：「法治已死」。我們之後還可以做的，只有繼續宣揚、教育公眾我們所認知的法治精神，等到香港重光之日，就是我們法治重光之時。 Link

一年, 情況只有越來越懷 国安法的通過 只會令更多人豁出去和政權對抗 只想和各位手足講聲,武運昌隆 要平安

「駐港國安公署人員依據本法執行職務，不受香港特別行政區管轄。」 「國安委工作信息不予公開，作出的決定不受司法覆核。」 「涉及國家秘密、公共秩序等情形不 宜公開審理的，禁止新聞界和公眾旁聽全部或者一部分審理程序。」 一條沒有細則就被「全票通過」的法案，深夜終於刊憲。國安公署人員執行職務，不受香港政府管轄，行政機關被徹底架空，由北京直接管治；國安委可以完全黑箱作業，任何決定都不受司法覆核挑戰，毫無制衡機制可言；「涉及國家機秘」案件審訊不予公開，與中國大陸完全接軌的「秘密審訊」正式降臨香港。 《党安法》徹底撕毀了香港僅餘的體制屏障，形同重寫《基本法》，香港自此中門大開，直接變成一国一制。 初選論壇過後，很多人問我：你口口聲聲說的「破局」，究竟是甚麼意思，遺憾在論壇上沒有時間說明。香港人從來活在中共設下的局中。擺在香港人面前的路只有兩條，要麼順從接受香港變成大陸，完全噤聲，活在衣食豐足卻毫無自主可言的牢獄之中，要麼負隅頑抗，結局尚未可知，但肯定不會是 happy ending，慘勝已是賺咗。 「破局」的路徑有很多版本，但至少，就明日而言，就在於，香港人能否憑藉不屈於極權的意志，衝破中共以恐懼消滅香港反抗聲音的盤算。 如果香港人被徹底滅聲——如果不止國際社會，連我們自己亦再也看不見、聽不見彼此的吶喊，香港就真的死了。 睇完，驚完，抖啖氣。 一陣見。

秘密審判 (41) 不准保釋 (42) 國安委不受司法覆核監督（13） 秘密監視 境外犯法照拉（37 38) 國安公署管理境外NGO及新聞機構（54） 直接套用中國刑事訴訟法（55）-即可以包括指定居所監視居住，不准見律師家人等 DQ (35)

假如你認真睇條文，你便輸了。 鬼國一向鍾意話你有罪就有罪，使乜睇條文㗎。 基本法用啲咁簡單嘅用字，佢哋都唔撚肯跟。你估嗰啲乜鬼國安法，真係會睇咩，咪戇撚鳩啦。 https://www.gld.gov.hk/egazette/pdf/20202444e/cs220202444136.pdf

hat his father is a tragedy. To the conspiracy of her father campaigning for the son, Erica Yuen responded with a laugh, and said, “We must vote out the conservative, old pan-democrats and the successors of these old pan-democratic directions. They’re extremely scary, can’t even take a single word of criticism, never admitting faults, and forever misjudging and falling behind situations. They only know how to spin their own fallacies and point fingers at fellow teammates.” The financial columnist, Muddy Dirty Water, wrote on his Facebook page that, “This is simple economics, because they see Daddy Yuen as a competitor who has also robbed them of many interests.” “The pan-dem mechanism has been carrying out their international work and lobbying through crowdfunding, but Daddy Yuen funded his own flights, and used his own resources to secure the more influential people in the US, such as Bannon, which is unlike a simple newspaper ad. The pan-dem mechanism naturally can’t stand it.” Seeing no elephant but only the seats; seeing no teammates but only conspiracies – perhaps this is just some slim pickings, but again, one rotten apple can spoil the whole bunch. Link

See No Elephant, Only Conspiracies (Lee Yee) Yesterday, Legislative Council (LegCo) member Eddie Chu Hoi-dick posted on his Facebook page that he originally shared my idea before changing his mind to support the primary election and eventually participated in it. His response was that the primary election is essential regardless of whether there will be a large-scale disqualification of candidates. He further said that the best defense against disqualification is not to fear it. One of the reasons for his continual support of the primary election, he continued, is to use it to establish a consensus of opposition that fundamentally opposes the National Security Law (NSL). If that is the plan, then the NSL must be the main topic of discussion in the primary election forum. According to Tanya Chan, convener of the pan-democratic camp, different political parties can only respond either by support or objection to the NSL under the shadow of possible disqualification. Therefore, the forum topic must revolve around whether to oppose the NSL. However, should a candidate disapprove of the NSL if it is almost certain to guarantee disqualification? If the candidate is successfully elected into the Legislative Council, under the threat of the NSL, should the candidate or its party succumb to the NSL irrespective of the rights of Hongkongers or stand up to it? Only if the primary election focuses primarily on this topic, then it will be possible to fulfill Chu’s wish: to use the primary election to build a consensus of opposition that fundamentally opposes the NSL. Having watched two primary election debates, the topic of NSL was only gently touched upon. In fact, many candidates did not mention sensitive topics that could lead to disqualification and put them in a dilemma. Most of them mentioned how they would unite and strive to win more than 35 seats which would put them in the majority, whether parliamentary resistance will be integrated with the fights on the street, whether they would oppose next year’s budget to force the Chief Executive to step down. There are also candidates who attacked the track records of the Democratic Party and the Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood (ADPL). The atmosphere of the forums did not bring about a sense of urgency on the NSL’s impending threat to our freedom and security, and its imminent destruction of “One Country, Two System.” The intention to initiate a consensus of opposition against NSL seems buoyant. At the pan-democratic primary election forum, the NSL was like an elephant in the room, so obvious but unseen by the candidates. The NSL descends upon us, yet the LegCo primary election was unaffected and indifferent as though Hong Kong is just running a peaceful election where everyone fights for a seat in the LegCo and as though those who successfully win the primary election would be guaranteed a seat. Pro-democrats did not see the elephant in the room but they saw the whimsical conspiracies of other candidates. Before Yuen Gongyi went to the United States to lobby for the rights and interests of Hongkongers, he posted on YouTube and unexpectedly gained mass popularity. He speaks bluntly, and his goals and all action plans are disclosed candidly online. Many netizens find his messages agreeable and admire him for standing up and taking action for Hongkongers. I rather think Yuen is quite a naive optimist, nevertheless I do agree with his fundamental ideologies. He previously criticized a pan-democrat which set off a conspiracy theory attack upon him within the pan-democrat discussion circle. They merely wondered from where he suddenly emerged and, like all conspiracy theories in the past, this was also based on no evidence. It got even more peculiar in recent days, when it has been theorize that his anti-CCP speeches were means to support the campaign of his slightly more, and evidently, pro-CCP son. Though they share the same blood, even the wildest imagination would not be linking the two’s political stances. All the more so when the son stated on radio t

樂觀d諗中共要殺你 係唔需要立法去殺你 要殺你有一萬種方法 佢要你死 你係唔知幾時要死更唔會知道自己幾時比中共殺

講晒我想講嘅野