CyberSecurity & AI Experts
🔰 Ethical Hacking and Cyber Security Official Telegram Channel 🔰 Free content to learn Hacking & AI For promotions: @coderfun
Mostrar más📈 Análisis del canal de Telegram CyberSecurity & AI Experts
El canal CyberSecurity & AI Experts (@ethicalhackingtoday) en el segmento lingüístico de Inglés es un actor destacado. Actualmente la comunidad reúne a 43 322 suscriptores, ocupando la posición 3 016 en la categoría Tecnologías y Aplicaciones y el puesto 8 808 en la región India.
📊 Métricas de audiencia y dinámica
Desde su creación el невідомо, el proyecto ha mostrado un crecimiento acelerado, reuniendo a 43 322 suscriptores.
Según los últimos datos del 26 agosto, 2026, el canal mantiene una actividad estable. En los últimos 30 días la variación de miembros fue de 570, y en las últimas 24 horas de 12, conservando un alto alcance.
- Estado de verificación: No verificado
- Tasa de interacción (ER): El promedio de interacción de la audiencia es 3.92%. Durante las primeras 24 horas tras publicar, el contenido suele obtener 1.42% de reacciones respecto al total de suscriptores.
- Alcance de las publicaciones: Cada publicación recibe en promedio 1 697 visualizaciones. En el primer día suele acumular 614 visualizaciones.
- Reacciones e interacción: La audiencia responde de forma activa: el promedio de reacciones por publicación es 4.
- Intereses temáticos: El contenido se centra en temas clave como git, |--, cybersecurity, linux, attack.
📝 Descripción y política de contenido
El autor describe el recurso como un espacio para expresar opiniones subjetivas:
“🔰 Ethical Hacking and Cyber Security Official Telegram Channel
🔰 Free content to learn Hacking & AI
For promotions: @coderfun”
Gracias a la alta frecuencia de actualizaciones (últimos datos recibidos el 27 agosto, 2026), el canal mantiene la vigencia y un amplio alcance. La analítica demuestra que la audiencia interactúa activamente con el contenido, lo que lo convierte en un punto de referencia dentro de la categoría Tecnologías y Aplicaciones.
whoami — identify the current user 👤
ss — view network connections and listening ports 🌐
ps — inspect running processes ⚙️
grep — search logs and files for specific patterns 🔎
chmod — manage file permissions 🔐
💡 These commands are especially useful for security monitoring, troubleshooting, log analysis, and understanding Linux systems.
Save this. More cybersecurity guides coming soon. ❤️"Your payroll account requires immediate verification."The attacker wants you to react before thinking. 🚨 Step 9: Create a Phishing Detection Workflow Your workflow can be: Email Received ↓ Check Sender ↓ Inspect Headers ↓ Check SPF/DKIM/DMARC ↓ Inspect Links ↓ Check Attachments ↓ Analyze Social Engineering ↓ Determine Risk ↓ Report / Quarantine 📋 Step 10: Create a Phishing Investigation Report Use this structure: Incident: Suspicious Email Investigation Sender: [Sender] Subject: [Subject] Date/Time: [Timestamp] Indicators: • Suspicious sender • Suspicious URL • Authentication failure • Urgent request SPF: [Result] DKIM: [Result] DMARC: [Result] Risk: Low / Medium / High Conclusion: [Legitimate / Suspicious / Phishing] Recommended Action: [Block / Report / Delete / Investigate] 🎯 Mini Challenge Find 5 safe sample phishing emails from security-awareness training resources. For each one: ✅ Identify the social-engineering tactic. ✅ Check the sender information. ✅ Identify suspicious links or attachments. ✅ Examine available authentication results. ✅ Decide whether the message is legitimate or suspicious. ✅ Document your reasoning. 🛡️ Real-World SOC Scenario Imagine an employee reports:
"I received an email saying my Microsoft account will be disabled."A SOC analyst might: 1. Examine the sender. 2. Inspect email headers. 3. Check SPF/DKIM/DMARC. 4. Analyze the URL. 5. Search security intelligence for indicators. 6. Determine whether other employees received the same message. 7. Block or quarantine confirmed malicious indicators. 8. Alert affected users. That's how a simple phishing report can become a real SOC investigation. 💡 Easy Trick to Remember STOP → CHECK → VERIFY → REPORT 🛑 Don't react immediately. 🔍 Check the details. ✅ Verify through an independent channel. 🚨 Report suspicious messages. 👉 Double Tap ❤️ For More
"Your account will be suspended today!"🎣 Suspicious Links The displayed text may not match the actual destination. 👤 Impersonation The sender may pretend to be: Bank HR IT department CEO Delivery company 📎 Unexpected Attachments Especially files you weren't expecting. 💰 Financial Requests Unexpected requests for: Money transfers Gift cards Bank details Payment information 📧 Step 3: Analyze Email Headers Email headers contain technical information about how an email was delivered. Look for: Sender information Recipient information Mail servers Timestamps Authentication results Many email clients provide an option such as: "Show original" or "View source." 🔐 Step 4: Understand SPF SPF (Sender Policy Framework) helps a domain specify which mail servers are authorized to send email on its behalf. Conceptually: Email claims: "I am from example.com" ↓ SPF Check ↓ Is the sending server authorized? ↓ Pass / Fail 🔏 Step 5: Understand DKIM DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) adds a cryptographic signature to outgoing email. The receiving mail system can verify the signature. This helps detect unauthorized modification and supports domain-level email authentication. 🛡️ Step 6: Understand DMARC DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance) builds on SPF and DKIM. It allows domain owners to specify how receiving mail systems should handle messages that fail authentication checks. Possible policies include: Monitor Quarantine Reject 🔥 SPF vs DKIM vs DMARC Technology - Main Purpose SPF - Verifies authorized sending servers DKIM - Verifies cryptographic email signatures DMARC - Defines policy and improves domain protection Together, they provide stronger email authentication. 🔗 Step 7: Inspect Links Safely Never blindly click a suspicious link. Instead, inspect the destination carefully. Ask: Does the domain match the claimed organization? Is there a suspicious spelling variation? Is the URL unusually long? Does the link use a URL shortener? Is the destination unexpected?
