es
Feedback
AntifashGordon Lawsuit

AntifashGordon Lawsuit

Ir al canal en Telegram

Christian Exoo [AntifashGordon] is being sued in federal court

Mostrar más
EEUU55 149Política46 582
365
Suscriptores
Sin datos24 horas
Sin datos7 días
Sin datos30 días

Carga de datos en curso...

Canales Similares
Sin datos
¿Algún problema? Por favor, actualice la página o contacte a nuestro gerente de soporte.
Nube de Etiquetas
Sin datos
¿Algún problema? Por favor, actualice la página o contacte a nuestro gerente de soporte.
Menciones Entrantes y Salientes
---
---
---
---
---
---
Atraer Suscriptores
julio '24
julio '24
+9
en 0 canales
junio '240
en 1 canales
Get PRO
mayo '240
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '240
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '240
en 14 canales
Get PRO
febrero '240
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '240
en 0 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '230
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '230
en 1 canales
Get PRO
octubre '230
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '23
+1
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '23
+2
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '23
+8
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '23
+6
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '23
+63
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '23
+15
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '23
+3
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '23
+2
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '23
+5
en 0 canales
Get PRO
diciembre '22
+13
en 0 canales
Get PRO
noviembre '22
+37
en 0 canales
Get PRO
octubre '22
+5
en 0 canales
Get PRO
septiembre '22
+7
en 0 canales
Get PRO
agosto '22
+32
en 0 canales
Get PRO
julio '22
+5
en 0 canales
Get PRO
junio '22
+44
en 0 canales
Get PRO
mayo '22
+39
en 0 canales
Get PRO
abril '22
+2
en 0 canales
Get PRO
marzo '22
+22
en 0 canales
Get PRO
febrero '22
+14
en 0 canales
Get PRO
enero '22
+232
en 0 canales
Publicaciones del Canal
AntifashGordon Lawsuit
Exoo-Reply brief to quash subpoena .pdf1.30 MB

2
In his response to the subpoena Exoo makes some interesting claims. D’Ambly argues that Exoo’s public statements indicate tha+1
In his response to the subpoena Exoo makes some interesting claims. D’Ambly argues that Exoo’s public statements indicate that there may be further communications pertinent to discovery. Exoo’s response is 1) the tip about D’Ambly being fired wasn’t entirely accurate 2) the tip was anonymous 3) he’s never communicated with the Daily News or Insite Risk Management. If all of the above is true, why not just produce the proof? Second, Exoo never addresses any possible communications with Daryl Lamont Jenkins. He seems to have left that out entirely. Full filing below with all documents (PACER). Be advised that it’s one single document but it includes all documents in the filing.
0
3
But the declaration filed by Exoo in his response to this subpoena are interesting, and it’s hidden behind Pacer. I’ll post t
But the declaration filed by Exoo in his response to this subpoena are interesting, and it’s hidden behind Pacer. I’ll post that entire filing below
0
4
For those wondering about discovery, Exoo appears to be stonewalling his communications. This is the April 1st filing by D’Am+2
For those wondering about discovery, Exoo appears to be stonewalling his communications. This is the April 1st filing by D’Ambly and I’ll link the most pertinent document. The attachments are just related proof of service. And since all are available and not entirely interesting I won’t post them all. D’Ambly’s argument is that these communications are directly related to the case and should be within scope. Exoo’s response is to try and quash the subpoena or file a protective order to remove them from the scope of discovery and keep them private. This includes communications with Daryl Lamont Jenkins as well. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.njd.445946/gov.uscourts.njd.445946.203.0.pdf
0
5
Settlement falls apart. April 17, 2024 Letter.pdf
0
6
After lengthy discussions between the parties, no settlement can be agreed upon. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.
After lengthy discussions between the parties, no settlement can be agreed upon. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.njd.445946/gov.uscourts.njd.445946.206.0.pdf
0
7
Exoo Motion to Quash Subpoena.pdf
0
8
Exoo filed a motion to quash the subpoena. I will upload it in full below. Basic takeaways: 1) invoking the 100 mile rule 2)
Exoo filed a motion to quash the subpoena. I will upload it in full below. Basic takeaways: 1) invoking the 100 mile rule 2) if plaintiffs get their way they’ll unmask Antifa 3) if unmask they could be harassed irl just like defendants do
0
9
This case has taken an interesting turn with the mediation failing. And if the subpoena of Exoo survives, there may be a trov
This case has taken an interesting turn with the mediation failing. And if the subpoena of Exoo survives, there may be a trove of details revealed. For example, we know that Exoo was close with former journalist Hilary Sargent. It’s believed that she is the owner of the recently suspended “AnonCommieStan”. The account engages in the same behavior as Exoo did to get sued. Sargent openly justifies Exoo’s actions and even believes them to be less harmful than anything that Andy Ngo does. Was Sargent part of the team? Maybe the subpoena will put an end to speculation. https://archive.vn/w31nX
0
10
It seems that this can’t be settled through mediation. Interesting to say the least https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/g
It seems that this can’t be settled through mediation. Interesting to say the least https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.njd.445946/gov.uscourts.njd.445946.196.0.pdf
0
11
Christian "Antifash Gordon" Exoo was served a subpoena in his ongoing lawsuit on March 6th demanding his Twitter data and a d+2
Christian "Antifash Gordon" Exoo was served a subpoena in his ongoing lawsuit on March 6th demanding his Twitter data and a deposition on the 20th His NLG lawyer is attempting to get it quashed for several reasons including that it would be used to "identify members of antifa" Exoo has largely been exiled from leftist circles following a statement from Torch Antifa accusing him of abuse and being a predator. The statement (archive.md/VeMqW) was taken down after a cease and desist Quash- https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.njd.445946/gov.uscourts.njd.445946.199.0.pdf Subpoena- https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.njd.445946/gov.uscourts.njd.445946.199.3.pdf
0
12
Just wanted to wish everyone a Merry Christmas! 🎄🎁 🎅 🍪 🥛
0
13
I need to inquire as to why the Plaintiff would be unable to select mediators. Maybe there’s a conflict of interest somewhere in the case. And that wouldn’t surprise me. So I will ask around and try to find out why this is happening and update everyone asap.
0
14
gov.uscourts.njd.445946.190.0.pdf
0
15
From the Dec 1 order, it appears that discovery may be held up due to mediators not yet being approved by the Plaintiff D’Amb
From the Dec 1 order, it appears that discovery may be held up due to mediators not yet being approved by the Plaintiff D’Ambly. Link https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.njd.445946/gov.uscourts.njd.445946.190.0.pdf Full document below
0
16
I’ll be updating this channel tomorrow. Personal issue got me all out of whack.
0
17
I have been informed there are some updates in the case and I’ll post them here shortly. Sorry for the delay.
0
18
The Scheduling for the Settlement Conference is now available. And it looks like the defendants need to respond to the Plaint+1
The Scheduling for the Settlement Conference is now available. And it looks like the defendants need to respond to the Plaintiff’s requests for discovery. In addition, it states that the court will address the parties disputes over the motion to compel compliance with subpoenas. This may be the Torch Antifa and One People’s Project subpoena. After all, they were the only ones involved in motions to compel. If it is concerning Torch, then their owner/founder Darryl Lamont Jenkins and One People’s Project may not be off the hook and may still be involved in the discovery process. Originally Jenkins celebrated the he agreement to settle. That may have been premature. This case is far from over. Matter of fact, they’re scheduling in to 2024.
0
19
Looks like settlement talks are scheduled soon. If both parties agree to the settlement, the subpoena against Torch Antifa an
Looks like settlement talks are scheduled soon. If both parties agree to the settlement, the subpoena against Torch Antifa and One Peoples Project gets terminated.
0
20
When it becomes available, and if it says anything more in the order, I’ll post it.
When it becomes available, and if it says anything more in the order, I’ll post it.
0
Ver todas las publicaciones