REP Channel
前往频道在 Telegram
📈 Telegram 频道 REP Channel 的分析概览
频道 REP Channel (@replabs) 英语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 1 334 318 名订阅者,在 加密货币 类别中位列第 78。
📊 受众指标与增长动态
自 невідомо 创建以来,项目保持高速增长,吸引了 1 334 318 名订阅者。
根据 23 十月, 2026 的最新数据,频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 -124 098,过去 24 小时变化为 -2 654,整体触达仍然可观。
- 认证状态: 未认证
- 互动率 (ER): 平均受众互动率为 0.40%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 N/A% 的反应,占订阅者总量。
- 帖子覆盖: 每篇帖子平均可获得 0 次浏览,首日通常累积 0 次浏览。
- 互动与反馈: 受众积极参与,单帖平均反应数为 0。
📝 描述与内容策略
作者将该频道定位为表达主观观点的平台:
“@repcoinbot”
凭借高频更新(最新数据采集于 24 十月, 2026),频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动,使其成为 加密货币 类别中的关键影响点。
1 334 318
订阅者
-2 65424 小时
-27 2377 天
-124 09830 天
帖子存档
1 334 318
Last week we hosted a space about agent trust. Two builders, two angles on the same problem.
Brian from Lagrange builds ZK proofs for AI - his take: most trust systems give you permission, not proof.
Isaac from Doppel Games builds agent vs agent gaming - his take: agents control wallets but nobody can see how decisions are made.
We cut the best moments. Watch: here with Brian and here with Isaac
1 334 318
Base processed $17 trillion in stablecoin volume last year. 140+ countries. 50+ funded teams. The #1 onchain venue for BTC spot trading.
That's the economy. But an economy without trust infrastructure is just volume.
Base is building four layers of trust. Most people have only heard of one. Wednesday we map the full stack.
Right now you can check your reputation here: click
1 334 318
In 1958 Fair Isaac built the first credit score. Before it, every borrower was a stranger. After it, your history spoke for you.
68 years later - AI agents operate billions onchain with zero credit history. Every trade recorded. Every repayment logged. Nobody composed it into a score.
68 years later, someone's finally building it. REP composes your onchain activity into a portable reputation score.
Try it:
https://base.app/app/app.r3p.xyz
1 334 318
Going live now.
ZK proves the math. Game logic proves the rules.
Who proves the track record?
Link:
https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2039353516414693713
1 334 318
ZK proves the computation. Onchain proves the rules. But who proves the agent's track record?
Tomorrow on X Spaces: Lagrange x Doppel Games x REP.
Who Vouches for Your Agent?
Apr 2, 2pm UTC
Join:
https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2039353516414693713
1 334 318
Would you lend $10,000 to someone with no name, no history, and no track record?
That's what DeFi protocols do every time an agent borrows. 71% of stablecoin volume is already bot-driven.
Agents run the plumbing: liquidations, arbitrage, routing. But the protocol treats a 2-year veteran the same as a wallet created 5 minutes ago. $15K collateral for a $10K loan. No exceptions.
The data to fix this is already onchain. Every transaction, every repayment. It just hasn't been turned into a score yet.
We broke down why this is the biggest missing layer in DeFi:
https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2039022966445347191
1 334 318
Would you lend $10,000 to someone with no name, no history, and no track record?
That's what DeFi protocols do every time an agent borrows. 71% of stablecoin volume is already bot-driven.
Agents run the plumbing: liquidations, arbitrage, routing. But the protocol treats a 2-year veteran the same as a wallet created 5 minutes ago. $15K collateral for a $10K loan. No exceptions.
The data to fix this is already on-chain. Every transaction, every repayment. It just hasn't been turned into a score yet.
We broke down why this is the biggest missing layer in DeFi: https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2039022966445347191
1 334 318
71% of stablecoin transfers in Q3 2025 were bot-driven. $15.6 trillion in a single quarter. Bots consume 56% of gas on Base, 40% of blockspace on Solana.
Not a single one has a reputation.
An agent borrows $10,000. Protocol sees an empty wallet. Demands $15,000 collateral. $5K frozen for nothing - same rate whether it ran 10,000 flawless trades or was deployed five minutes ago.
Why is this the most significant gap in the DeFi infrastructure?
March 31: response date
1 334 318
Google Research found that coordinated multi-agent teams outperform solo agents by 80%. Uncoordinated teams? Only 57%. That 23% gap is the coordination tax and it's measurable.
Mnemom's trust data makes it sharper: "Five high-performing agents with poor coordination can create more risk than a cohesive mid-tier group." The risk isn't weak agents. It's strong agents that don't work together.
A registry knows who's on the team. It has no idea how the team behaves. Group coherence requires runtime proof: who did what, in what order, with what outcome.
This is why proof-based identity isn't a nice-to-have. It's the missing coordination layer.
1 334 318
25% of TON wallets are in REP.
70% of Farcaster Pro subscribers are in REP.
your track record shouldn't vanish when you move chains.
portable reputation means your credibility follows you everywhere.
@repcoinbot
1 334 318
uber solved trust in rides. airbnb in stays. amazon in commerce.
each became a $100B+ company.
now imagine solving trust across all of them.
the graph is the infrastructure layer.
@repcoinbot
1 334 318
51% of internet traffic is now bots.
the remaining 49% can't prove they're real.
billions wasted because you can't verify who you're dealing with.
1 334 318
In drops, everyone usually rejoices at the first figures.
But after a couple of days, it becomes much more difficult to understand what really worked and what just looked good at the moment.
We briefly analyzed this on X 👇
https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2028433885248307658
1 334 318
REP Graph is already routing real value.
3.5M+ users are in the graph, and around $0.5M has already been distributed through graph-based targeting.
When history becomes legible, activity starts turning into access, rewards, and better selection.
Connect to REP and put your track record to work.
@repcoinbot
1 334 318
REP crossed an important milestone - but the interesting part isn’t the number.
Different ecosystems, different users, one overlapping social layer forming in real time👇
https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2018258781809901963
1 334 318
onchain consistency now means something.
your past starts to speak for itself 👇
https://x.com/rep_hq/status/2010386436063973524
1 334 318
Reputation is quietly becoming the real currency of the internet.
Information is infinite. Copying, posting, shipping - anyone can do it.
The real edge is already onchain.
Your actions, your timing, your consistency over time.
What’s actually limited is TRUST and it gets more expensive every cycle.
Tokens rotate. Reputation stays.
@repcoinbot | TON 0.5% Chat
1 334 318
REP users are getting 100 whitelist spots for Mr. Freeman upcoming stickers mint!
We are going to distribute them through a raffle. Actually, 3 raffles.
👑 O-rank holders get 50 WL spots. Are you o-rank? Join the chat and fill in the form!
🎁 TG Gift holders get 30 WL spots. Join the Gift Chat and fill in the form there!
🎱 Neither o-rank nor have gifts? Worry not. As long as your REP rank is above pilgrim — fill in this raffle form. There are 20 WL spots!
Good luck and make haste: the forms will be closed Nov 15, 15:00 UTC
@repcoinbot | TON 0.5% Chat | REP: Gifts Chat
1 334 318
REPosystem map v. 0.9
Just a half year after the launch, dozens of projects are connected to REP: protocols, DeFi platforms, onchain apps on TON. Partnerships keep growing and new integrations are on the way.
Even more signals, more ways to earn, more value behind every action are going to be in REP soon.
The network of trust is taking shape and it’s only the beginning.
@repcoinbot | TON 0.5% Chat | REP: Gifts Chat
1 334 318
Plush Pepe and Durov’s Cap are two most iconic gifts on Telegram.
Recognizable. Meme-worthy. Instantly signal-rich.
And their holders? Carry serious weight in REP.
Together, they represent a deep well of onchain reputation:
Plush Pepe holders alone contribute over 6,916,368 REP,
while Durov’s Caps bring in another 5,075,440 REP to the network.
But here’s the thing: if you hold a gift and haven’t activated REP,
you’re only using half of what it can do.
Connect to REP. Let your collection build your identity.
@repcoinbot | TON 0.5% Chat | REP: Gifts Chat
