AISecHub
前往频道在 Telegram
2 652
订阅者
+124 小时
+217 天
+8830 天
数据加载中...
相似频道
无数据
有任何问题？请刷新页面或联系我们的客服。
进出提及
---
---
---
---
---
---
吸引订阅者
八月 '26
八月 '26
+136
在2个频道中
七月 '26
+111
在1个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '26
+113
在3个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '26
+163
在4个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '26
+100
在2个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '26
+192
在3个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '26
+239
在5个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '26
+394
在4个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '25
+204
在4个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '25
+140
在4个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '25
+167
在3个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '25
+270
在1个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '25
+95
在1个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '25
+93
在2个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '25
+68
在1个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '25
+375
在3个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '25
+43
在2个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '25
+735
在1个频道中
| 日期 | 订阅者增长 | 提及 | 频道 | |
| 28 八月 | +4 | |||
| 27 八月 | +3 | |||
| 26 八月 | +2 | |||
| 25 八月 | +7 | |||
| 24 八月 | +6 | |||
| 23 八月 | +7 | |||
| 22 八月 | +3 | |||
| 21 八月 | +4 | |||
| 20 八月 | +8 | |||
| 19 八月 | +6 | |||
| 18 八月 | +19 | |||
| 17 八月 | +25 | |||
| 16 八月 | +4 | |||
| 15 八月 | +2 | |||
| 14 八月 | +3 | |||
| 13 八月 | +3 | |||
| 12 八月 | +5 | |||
| 11 八月 | +6 | |||
| 10 八月 | +1 | |||
| 09 八月 | 0 | |||
| 08 八月 | +3 | |||
| 07 八月 | +2 | |||
| 06 八月 | +3 | |||
| 05 八月 | +2 | |||
| 04 八月 | +1 | |||
| 03 八月 | +3 | |||
| 02 八月 | +2 | |||
| 01 八月 | +2 |
频道帖子
| 2 |  5 Lessons from the OpenAI–Hugging Face Incident
1️⃣ AI creates real cybersecurity risk
2️⃣ The Hugging Face incident was not simply an unavoidable “loss of control”
3️⃣ Sandboxing alone is insufficient
4️⃣ AI-agent security needs defense in depth
5️⃣ The fundamental failure was organizational, not technological
https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/5-lessons-from-the-openai-hugging | 109 |
| 3 |  https://github.com/S1N6H/pentest-harness | 261 |
| 4 |  https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/security/fundamentals/shared-responsibility-ai-agent | 209 |
| 5 |  New service is live now. Going to try it soon. | 200 |
| 6 |  https://github.com/UKGovernmentBEIS/optstop | 217 |
| 7 |  https://embracethered.com/blog/posts/2026/breaking-claude-code-opus-5-and-automode/ | 220 |
| 8 |  Trusting the it’s NOT us, it’s the AI people. Good luck!
https://openai.com/collective-cyberdefense/ | 227 |
| 9 | Opportunities-for-AI-in-cyber-defence.pdf | 249 |
| 10 | OpenAI-Hugging-Face Incident-Technical-Report.pdf | 3 |
| 11 |  https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7498773080039944192 | 248 |
| 12 | When you read this report, you get the feeling that they are blaming AI and the agents for everything that happened in this incident.
People online, of course, noticed the way the report was written. It is a little strange that there is almost no acknowledgment of responsibility from the humans who developed and operated these agents. The writing makes it seem as though you can simply blame the agents and move on.
They are facing lawsuits, and this report is not exactly helping them.
Repeat after me: Agents are bad. AI is bad.
This approach to personal accountability is not particularly impressive. | 262 |
| 13 |  没有文字... | 268 |
| 14 | OpenAI-Hugging-Face Incident-Technical-Report.pdf | 258 |
| 15 |  https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-incident-and-the-road-ahead/
https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/67869394-cb91-4c12-888c-5cbd85c7814c/OpenAI-Hugging-Face%20Incident-Technical-Report.pdf | 253 |
| 16 |  https://www.cyera.com/research/nemoclaw-one-website-visit-to-hijack-your-ai-agent | 250 |
| 17 |  https://blog.trailofbits.com/2026/08/26/vms-wont-contain-cyber-capable-agents/
“We asked GPT 5.6-Cyber to escape a VM used to sandbox agents. It broke out three times.
In its final escape, the agent found three 0-days on its own and chained them into a working exploit” | 287 |
| 18 |  https://cdn.sanity.io/files/1lq2ca9s/production/b43e9562f5642b350b71a4101fd68086366a7920.pdf?dl=XBOW-WHITEPAPER-Mid-Year-2026-AI-Model-Security-Research-Report.pdf | 267 |
| 19 |  https://openai.com/index/disrupting-malicious-uses-of-ai-influence-campaign-russia/ | 296 |
| 20 |  Maybe “It’s AI, not us” claims will stop here. Maybe | 315 |
