Uncensored ➡️@hersantite

This is the scenario Thomas Sewell was talking about when he said “we have recruited hundreds of autistic teens, and none have gone on to do terror attacks”. Victoria Police and the Australian Federal Police on the other hand were grooming and actively encouraging a 13yo to go and do ISIS terrorism, encouraging him to make a bomb or become a sniper. Police were simultaneously buying him a birthday cake whilst plotting to arrest him.

Social Cohesion status: “Shut your bitch ass up.” "Canberra is full of pedos" "There is no stopping the masses from waking up, have a nice day you evil bitch!" Lmao, online netizens putting in work https://t.me/ausvstheagenda/3999

Brendan Lim SC returning on Day 2 to have to face the bench for another grilling.

James Mason reads and reacts to my article on the White Australia Party’s hearing in the High Court.

White authors are explicitly excluded from this bookstore in Australia, but how far does their ban go? From AUSPILL (X)

Hersant shorts if they were actually good

Commonwealth senior barrister btw

‘We didn’t dissolve the party. We just made being a member of it a crime punishable by 7 years in jail.’ I may have misspoken. This could be the funniest argument the Commonwealth made. They seem unfamiliar with the phrase ‘a distinction without a difference’. Their logic is about as sound as saying ‘I wasn’t cheating on you. I was just exploring other options.’

This is the bit where Gageler had identified that in essence, it was similar to the forced dissolution of the Communist party. Whilst the language is different, "prohibited" vs "dissolved", in substance it is the same. Seemed Sharifys arguments earlier of "you cannot run an organisation from jail" resonated. Justice Beech-Jones also made an observation that members are forced to resign or be subject to punishment.

I asked the speaker of the house for comment on White Australia Party’s high court challenge against his government’s laws which banned them. I think he forgot what democracy is.. From AUSPILL (x)

How many contradictions does Chris Merritt want to have in one opinion piece? These traitors hate freedom (implied or otherwise) and they hate that the constitution outlines a system whereby Australians freely choose their representatives. They believe in freedom only in the very basic and limited way that any despot does: freedom for me and tyranny for you.

The Australian seething that political communication exists. https://archive.is/Tj1KJ "Reform has finally arrived for one of the High Court’s worst ideas: 1992’s implied constitutional freedom of political communication. It is a judicial creation never approved by the Australian people." "Legal Expert" shabbos goy Chris Merritt (half of whose articles are about jews and israel) really believes that political communication is one of the High Court's "worst ideas" and is not a right that Australians agree with or deserve. Jews and their cuck supporters hate our Anglo concepts of freedom and free speech. Not every boomer but always a boomer.

In my view, this is probably the funniest legal argument the Commonwealth deployed in the whole case. You thought robbing Peter to pay Paul was bad: try disenfranchising Clancy to enfranchise Zhang, Mohammed and Arjun. Non-Whites are such natural liberal-democrats that they need the host nation to be violently suppressed by the state in order to be able to participate. How would they survive another name on the ballot?

In my view, this is probably the funniest legal argument the Commonwealth deployed made in the whole case. You thought robbing Peter to pay Paul was bad: try disenfranchising Clancy to enfranchise Zhang, Mohammed and Arjun. Non-Whites are such natural liberal-democrats that they need to host nation to be violently suppressed by the state in order to be able to participate.

Thomas Sewell says if the White Australia Party wins its High Court case, it will assist the creation of a Pauline Hanson prime ministership. "Keep Pauline honest" Follow: @NoticerNews

New X article for the fanatics following along closely, on my cautious assessment of the White Australia Party High Court case. Goes into detail about the questions asked by the justices, their seeming positions inferred from their lines of questioning, and an overview of what was argued. There was a lot to have to condense for over two days of oral argument and questions from the justices. Read time: 8 - 9 minutes. You can view without leaving telegram at the link below: https://fixupx.com/LonePatriot14/status/2097880903922118950?s=20

I increased saturation and brightness of this edit because it was hard to see on phones; and I removed the niche description for wider usage. Pink Floyd absolutely cooked with these visuals. They perfectly depicted the awesome night out the boys end up having when you decide to stay in like a little bitch.