ch
Feedback
Ruh'Space

Ruh'Space

前往频道在 Telegram

For thoughts too unruly to keep in my head and too interesting to leave there.

显示更多
780
订阅者
+224 小时
+87
+6530
吸引订阅者
八月 '26
八月 '26
+69
在6个频道中
七月 '26
+46
在3个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '26
+44
在6个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '26
+56
在3个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '26
+18
在6个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '26
+39
在8个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '26
+14
在3个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '26
+25
在3个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '25
+48
在5个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '25
+34
在6个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '25
+42
在3个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '25
+50
在7个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '25
+32
在6个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '25
+53
在8个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '25
+38
在3个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '25
+33
在2个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '25
+32
在6个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '25
+19
在2个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '25
+40
在3个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '25
+107
在15个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '24
+120
在9个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '24
+41
在3个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '24
+66
在6个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '24
+304
在26个频道中
日期
订阅者增长
提及
频道
28 八月+3
27 八月+2
26 八月0
25 八月+3
24 八月+1
23 八月+1
22 八月0
21 八月+1
20 八月+1
19 八月0
18 八月+5
17 八月0
16 八月+1
15 八月+3
14 八月0
13 八月+3
12 八月+4
11 八月+4
10 八月+4
09 八月+2
08 八月+1
07 八月+1
06 八月+1
05 八月+3
04 八月+3
03 八月+4
02 八月+4
01 八月+14
频道帖子
Modernist Art in Ethiopia (Elizabeth W. Giorgis).pdf9.35 MB

2
"Cat people are kinder than Dog people" I'm going to prove your point and train my dog to crack open people's skull and eat their አንጎል።
100
3
I fucking love this group and Aida's mixes [the homies mixing R&B and falling into a black hole]
I fucking love this group and Aida's mixes [the homies mixing R&B and falling into a black hole]
93
4
Zizek hating on capitalism >> King Solomon in መኀልየ መኃልይ
131
5
The world is getting so ugly and bleak and it’s hard not to feel so hopeless. but we have to remember that they want us to feel that way. it reminds me of this quote by James Baldwin.. “Not everything that is faced can be changed; but nothing can be changed until it is faced.” there’s a danger in letting hopelessness convince us that resistance is pointless, because once we believe nothing can change, we stop trying to change it. refusing to look away, refusing to become numb, and refusing to accept cruelty as inevitable is already a form of resistance. joy is resistance. it’s really scary times but we are all in this together. Dehna ederu🩵
198
6
4_5803071184257949974.m4a
185
7
ድንግል ማርያም helping a dude kick the ass out of another dude and get thousands of birr in return ⚡️⚡️⚡️
135
8
Men doing allat just to touch eachother's naked bodies
175
9
ላሸነፈው ነው ምደግፈው እኔ
177
10
I used to hate him during my hyper-religious phase because I genuinely thought he had demons in him. Apparently I also thought I had the gift of discerning spirits 😭. But honestly, I still hate him. I can't even tell if it's the colonizer Englishman face, the way he talks, or that unbearably smug tone of his, but something about him makes my entire nervous system go euyuk.
192
11
Richard Dawkins ይደብረኛል
181
12
4_5800819384444267079.m4a
182
13
Hume on Is and Ought | Issue 83 | Philosophy Now https://share.google/DOyCv2V9GiC85LBlh
184
14
The essay’s whole argument about Zizekian subjectivity is basically an attempt to answer a deceptively simple question: what exactly is the “I”? It moves through Hegel, Lacan, existentialism (Sartre 🩵) and psychoanalysis to argue that the subject is not some stable little thing sitting underneath all our identities. At its core, it is a kind of lack, a gap that we keep covering with symbolic identities, desires and fantasies. We take the things that can be said about us and gradually mistake them for the thing itself. And somehow, this made me think of Hume. More specifically, Hume’s is-ought problem. The way I understand it is almost like a logical structure: P implies Q Except P doesn't necessarily imply Q. You can have: P: Humans naturally desire pleasure. Q: Therefore, humans ought to pursue pleasure. But P does not imply Q which means a thing is missing and you need another premise: R: Whatever humans naturally desire, they ought to pursue. Now P + R = Q. R is the bridge which means it's the bridge, and it is often the part people quietly smuggle into the argument without noticing. That is what I found very similar movement in the Žižekian argument about identity. P: I have certain traits, desires, roles, experiences and characteristics. Q: Therefore, this is who I essentially am.» But again P doesn't imply Q. Where did the bridge come from? Why should everything that can be predicated of me add up to some final, essential “me”? Why should what I am described as automatically become what I am? And I think that's what made the Hume connection click for me. Hume made me suspicious of the leap between a premise and its conclusion. Žižek, in a completely different philosophical context, made me suspicious of the leap between description and an identity. We constantly make these tiny transitions without noticing: I behave this way therefore I am this kind of person. People see me this way therefore this is who I am. I have become this therefore this is what I must be. But none of those conclusions simply falls out of the premise. The bridge is the most Interesting question philosophical to me. (I obviously care whether P and Q are but still)
167
15
a critical out line of Zizekian Subjectivity .pdf
156
16
https://youtu.be/3pUdUX5Gagc?si=bavjeoJVz4yfeuYs
161
17
没有文字...
161
18
I don't know how to articulate this in a way that doesn't betray my lack of manners or patience for people I consider stupid but I feel like at this day and age if someone genuinely cannot understand nuance, I struggle to take their opinions seriously. Not everything is good or evil, true or false, progressive or regressive, and not every complicated question becomes simpler just because you force it into two opposing camps. At some point, being able to sit with contradiction, context, and the possibility that you might be wrong should be considered a basic intellectual skill rather than some extraordinary achievement. I don't need everyone to agree with me. I just need you to understand that reality is rarely obligated to be as simple as your opinion about it...
180
19
Not y'all agreeing 😭
182
20
"God is a girl dad" 👩🏽‍🦽‍➡️
182