Debugging Epohul

this book helped me score better in the stat courses I took in uni (did I pick it up because of the cover? yes, I did)

Okay, this is finally up. Not a men vs women thing, not a lecture. A lot of us live in a bubble, tech, creative, liberal spaces, where things look fine for women, but there's a mindset that follows us out of it and into our own heads. I wrote a piece to show what it's actually like to move through the world as a woman, so you feel it instead of being argued at. Including what the "man-hater" is really reacting to, because it isn't hate, even when it sounds like it. Please read the whole thing, it's one picture, and the pieces only add up together. Half of it out of context reads wrong. If you've ever been confused why women say it's still not okay when it looks fine to you, this is the walk-through. https://frostysiren.substack.com/p/on-being-seen?r=8ulkmq And if it resonates, share it with anyone you think it might reach, women who'll feel seen, and men who genuinely want to understand

when I feel a sharp pain in my abdomen (followed by thoughts if the hospital will have a good place to join a meeting)

My sister is trying to pick a major that give her a good foundation in her undergrad and would let her customize it to her interest later on. These are the two choices we're considering right now. She will still do/learn coding but I feel like she has to have another niche beside that.

I think I gotta set a rule to limit the number of different books I'm gonna read at the same time 4 sounds like a good number...Maybe 3

i want to make art like these someday

I'm done with this. I'm satisfied with my work and I did try to finish the bonus lab too but I don't actually get it(it's about obtaining ground state for Nitrogen molecule on real qc device using SQD). this was nice:) #qiskitsummerschool

practicing my esksta cause "having a rhythm" gene might have skipped me (this is so much fun...lowkey the best with jano band's song)

if overthinking was a sport

can you feel the love she has for me

couldn't be more excited for this

i'm so happy rn

wasting my precious 10 minutes per month IBM's compute time and not getting the result I wanted hurts more

nvm it's completed hehe

waiting for more than 20 minute in queue for a task that takes almost 20 seconds #IBMQuantum #

making healthier choices is boring

to cleanse the qc spirit for a bit

How to interpret quantum hardware specs - Number of qubits: how many physical qubits the chip has. (Note: "programmable" = the ones you can run on, "physical" = total on the chip.) - Basis gates: the only gates the hardware can natively run. Your code gets transpiled so it's expressed using just these. - Readout error: the error during measurement. Lower is better. - 1Q / 2Q gate error: the noise each gate adds. Two-qubit gates are ~10× noisier than single-qubit ones, so this is the number that judges a device. - CLOPS (Circuit Layer Operations Per Second): how many gate layers run per second. Throughput, like classical computers. Higher = faster (not more accurate). - T1 (energy relaxation): time for excited |1⟩ to decay to |0⟩. - T2 (dephasing): time before phase coherence between |0⟩ and |1⟩ is lost. The longer T1 and T2, the deeper the circuit you can run before noise wins. (the image is one of IBM device from https://quantum.cloud.ibm.com/computers?limit=10 ) #Note