Anteater’s Amazon
前往频道在 Telegram
📈 Telegram 频道 Anteater’s Amazon 的分析概览
频道 Anteater’s Amazon (@anteateramazon) 英语 语言赛道中的 是活跃参与者。目前社区聚集了 11 516 名订阅者，在 加密货币 类别中位列第 8 483，并在 新加坡 地区排名第 279 位。
📊 受众指标与增长动态
自 невідомо 创建以来，项目保持高速增长，吸引了 11 516 名订阅者。
根据 17 十月, 2026 的最新数据，频道保持稳定运转。过去 30 天订阅人数变化为 -147，过去 24 小时变化为 -4，整体触达仍然可观。
- 认证状态： 未认证
- 互动率 (ER)： 平均受众互动率为 27.52%。内容发布后 24 小时内通常能获得 11.01% 的反应，占订阅者总量。
- 帖子覆盖： 每篇帖子平均可获得 3 170 次浏览，首日通常累积 1 268 次浏览。
- 互动与反馈： 受众积极参与，单帖平均反应数为 6。
- 主题关注点： 内容集中在 mstr, defi, eth, concern, leg 等核心主题上。
📝 描述与内容策略
尚未提供频道描述。
凭借高频更新（最新数据采集于 18 十月, 2026），频道始终保持新鲜度与高覆盖。分析显示受众积极互动，使其成为 加密货币 类别中的关键影响点。
11 516
订阅者
-424 小时
-1247 天
-14730 天
正在加载数据
吸引订阅者
十月 '2610月 '26
十月 '26
+35
在0个频道中
九月 '26
+23
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '26
+8
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '26
+13
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '26
+33
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '26
+38
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '26
+74
在2个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '26
+164
在4个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '26
+159
在7个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '26
+105
在8个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '25
+96
在2个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '25
+201
在4个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '25
+331
在8个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '25
+218
在12个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '25
+270
在6个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '25
+273
在6个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '25
+263
在10个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '25
+267
在7个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '25
+537
在7个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '25
+644
在7个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '25
+333
在4个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '25
+658
在12个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '24
+7 098
在22个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '24
+509
在16个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '24
+321
在12个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '24
+298
在10个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '24
+2 566
在9个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '24
+306
在6个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '24
+4 631
在9个频道中
| 日期 | 订阅者增长 | 提及 | 频道 | |
| 18 十月 | +1 | |||
| 17 十月 | 0 | |||
| 16 十月 | 0 | |||
| 15 十月 | +1 | |||
| 14 十月 | +1 | |||
| 13 十月 | 0 | |||
| 12 十月 | +2 | |||
| 11 十月 | +1 | |||
| 10 十月 | +1 | |||
| 09 十月 | +3 | |||
| 08 十月 | +1 | |||
| 07 十月 | +6 | |||
| 06 十月 | 0 | |||
| 05 十月 | +3 | |||
| 04 十月 | +2 | |||
| 03 十月 | 0 | |||
| 02 十月 | +1 | |||
| 01 十月 | +12 |
频道帖子
oh and - do not underestimate how much time and effort it will take to develop formal relationships w/ tardfi instis.
| 2 | oh and tangent to this - if you haven't already, do look up tax implications on trading crypto tardfi instruments over direct crypto in your jurisdictions.
highly jurisdiction specific but for example in singapore under structures like a 13O it is significantly better to trade them in tardfi instruments instead where possible. | 1 515 |
| 3 | with all the hacks going on - crowdsourcing here for an informed view on what the ideal setup is for crypto rn.
e.g. - which apple devices would you buy, how would you set it up, what muiltisig and so on. | 1 979 |
| 4 | separately, curious if anyone has stopped using PRs and instead just push to main + rely on CI. ampcode has been a proponent for this and they’ve been constantly ahead of the curve.
curious how that worked out for yall.
my bottleneck is increasingly CI w my latest workflow changes | 3 564 |
| 5 | i think subscription subsidies will only continue to erode from here so if you have stuff you’ve been wanting to build best to get on them asap | 3 384 |
| 6 | i’m incinerating tokens though - def not efficient usage cos the coordinator threads are constantly reading other threads’ transcripts (due to running out of context, compaction not reliable etc) | 3 035 |
| 7 | ironically the direction that seems to work best for me for now is using /goal to manage other threads’ /goals lol.
also built a centralised service that serves as the store of truth / single coordination point for all thread lifecycles. seems to work quite well for long duration tasks now | 2 755 |
| 8 | some decent recommendations in the comments - cheers! always happy to discuss ai & ai tooling! | 3 591 |
| 9 | also not to start a religion war - but i found my experience working w clankers (i dont read any code) to improve quite a bit using golang.
i dont need to use rust for the stuff im building and its been a bliss over using tons of typescript+python. | 3 |
| 10 | the problem with /goal is that you have to define an outcome initially - but it’s not natural ux imo. most of my prompts are a long yap that might not necessarily contain clearly defined outcomes.
v curious if anyone has solved this well yet | 3 426 |
| 11 | for those of you who multi account - curious what your setup is.
i run 5 codex and 2 claude max subs rn, using omp.
biggest issue i face is babysitting threads for trivial approvals. curious how you deal w this.
i was thinking of implementing a background llm observer that reads all my transcripts (triggered by hooks) and makes notes / auto-replies for trivial stuff.
/goal mode has been ok-ish but i feel like it’s a ux that shouldn’t even exist. agent should know to keep going basically | 3 280 |
| 12 | What interaction do you prefer when using LLMs? | 3 756 |
| 13 | Which interaction do your kids prefer when they use LLMs? | 3 347 |
| 14 |  final non-mkt related yap
it surprises me just how resistant people still are to adopting LLMs.
i’d encourage you to do so if you haven’t already.
i’ve found myself preferring to talk to LLMs over most people nowadays. | 3 894 |
| 15 |  没有文字... | 3 349 |
| 16 | https://darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier | 3 498 |
| 17 | dms always open to discuss ideas @GiantAnteater | 4 077 |
| 18 | but in a year or two from now i think 1k is on the cards | 1 468 |
| 19 | htf i don’t think eth will ever trade sub 500 | 1 213 |
| 20 | eth probably on its last legs imo | 1 135 |
