Jason Cannon

Your “right wing” media, sir. @fashwave3

With war in Israel, suddenly “racially-motivated right wing extremism” is no longer Australia’s top threat.

The Hidden Figures of Australian Multiculturalism: #5 Grisha Sklovsky Foundational chairman of the Australian multicultural broadcaster SBS from 1978-1981, and board member until 1983. Sklovsky oversaw the acquisition of the previously independent ethnic radio stations (2EA and 3EA) as well as the launch of multicultural television programming in 1979, all in pursuit of creating a “harmonious, broader multicultural Australia.” At the time, the need for a strong Jewish presence at the SBS was demanded by Jewish groups, who had hitherto attacked the experimental ethnic radio stations for their alleged anti-semitism. The unmoderated nature of these channels allowed ethnic groups to freely broadcast anti-Zionist sentiment, from Arabic news to the Ustascha-supporting Croats. Once under the control of the SBS, ethnic radio soon found itself hamstrung by new guidelines, with Sklovsky ensuring that ethnic radio “was not a geopolitical program. This was not a religious or anti-religious or anti-neighbour program.”

You just want to go back to the 50s: It’s a regular occurrence for anti-whites to make reference to “the 1950s” in a critique, as way to point to some kind of conservative golden age which an out-of-touch reactionary pines to return to. If you ever hear it, you can make a mental note that this person probably gets most of their political opinions from television and movies. Far from conservatism, the 1950s in the West was one of fundamental social and political transformation. Look beyond the shallow indicators of GDP growth and you will find a decade which saw the emergence of a radical individualism, mass consumerism and the social atomisation of society. Consider but just a few of the salient trends of this supposedly conservative zenith of a decade: The arrival of television and the art of mass persuasion. The flourishing of suburbia, the end of multi-generational households and the wrecking of the traditional city in favour of the convenience offered by the motor car. The peak of communist agitation and the heyday of psychoanalysis. The rise of youth culture and rock n’ rock music. Religious belief was hollowed out and people began to eschew proper meals in favour of TV dinners and surgary, processed fast foods. It saw watershed moments in our legal systems; Brown v. Board of Education, Roth v. United States, and the Wolfenden report. Only when juxtaposed against the modern day horrors of drug epidemics, internet porn and transgenderism is this decade of radical change transformed into a conservative era. In truth, what was birthed in the 1950s has never really left us.

The architectural and cultural decline of Australia, expressed in 3 separate buildings that have occupied the same plot of land in the Melbourne CBD: From an intricately crafted gem of Melbourne’s boom era developed for the social good (a temperance hotel), to a 70s concrete office block occupied by the Commonwealth Bank, and now finally a vapid glass-curtain skyscraper developed by a Jewish funds management company for use by a foreign mega corporation (Amazon).

Admittedly central Budapest still has its share of prominent modernist stinkers - the brown monstrosity that envelops Madách Imre Square springs to mind. But the visible lack of modern “diversity” ( in both architectural form and the demographics of its people) can’t help but make an impression on you. The Hungarian parliament building(pictured), a Neo-Gothic masterpiece, is just stunning in-person. Without an appreciation of beauty, no wonder we can no longer build like this anymore.

Ed Dutton on the importance of beauty in architecture https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/02/16/architecture-and-art/

According to the Murdoch press, the proper response to the moral outrage over the act of “doxxing” is… to dox the culprits in return.

People on the right have been subjected to this kind of (often state sponsored) harassment for years, including from the very same masthead that published this article. Happens one time to a group of zionist activists and the entire Australian political apparatus steps into gear to defend them. According to the article: “the changes will include an exemption for public interest journalism such as reporting on public figures.” In other words, it will still be legal for a journalist to dox and harass a “Nazi.”

In case you thought it’s only in Palestine that Jewish terror and land theft is on full display, Jews from New York are on the verge of successfully stealing land from an 83-year old pensioned German woman - a property her family purchased 85 years ago at market price and have held onto for generations. The Jewish Claims Conference plan to sell on the house and donate the profits to holocaust survivors, leaving Gabriele Lieske homeless and her family in crippling debt from legal fees as a result of failed attempts to challenge the ruling. https://www.thejc.com/news/world/german-family-fear-eviction-from-home-forcibly-bought-from-jews-in-1939-px1vrfcp

It’s a safe bet that we will soon see a media and reporting blackout on African crime in Queensland, just like what occurred in Melbourne back in 2018. For the record, I have always suspected Jewish law firm ABL was deeply involved in this Victorian effort, given how much thier Sudanese “star lawyer” Nyadol Nyuon was pushed in the press. Keep an eye out for a new police taskforce or African lawyers being given a platform - telltale signs they are brewing the suppression of facts.

An analogy of the power of group strategy(and how to defeat it): Let’s say there is a hypothetical group of 100 people that exist in some kind of formal arrangement, perhaps a club or a society. Of these, 80 of them are classified as being on “team blue” and 20 of them as “team red”. Now in a basic conflict of interest between team blue and team red, team blue wins out every time due to being in the clear overwhelming majority. But what happens if you introduce an individualist/group strategy dynamic to the equation? Suppose that in fact team blue refuses to even identify as “team blue.” Each member eschews the identity in order to act only as a colourless individual. It’s seen as “colourist” or disreputable to classify yourself as a blue and blues are taught (perhaps covertly by the reds) that is dangerous to build a team identity around it. Meanwhile team red is an almost cohesive unit as “team red.” Almost all acknowledge they are on the same team and are proud to be so. They have no qualms about identifying as a member of “team red” and organising together as such. Once this dynamic has been introduced, it is no longer 80 blues against 20 reds, it becomes 20 against 1, 20 against 1, and so on and so forth. Unless team blue begins to act as “team blue”, team red will win out single every time. Note in this hypothetical, that one does not even require the majority of blues to act as team blue, only enough to defeat team red.

✡️🇮🇱🇺🇸 Jewish OnlyFans owner Leonid Radvinsky has been revealed as the biggest donor to AIPAC since October 7th. Literally a Jewish pornographer using his fortune to help bribe politicians to secure support for Israel's genocidal war. X post 🔗

The Hidden Figures of Australian Multiculturalism: #4 Henry Richard Krygier Publisher and founder in 1954 of the Australian arm of the Congress for Cultural Freedom, a Jewish led anti-communist group later discovered to be funded by the CIA. Co-founder of Quadrant magazine in 1956, Krygier served as publisher and long-time “ideas man”, taking direct inspiration from Irving Kristol’s Encounter in the UK. Under his watch, Quadrant would quickly become Australia’s premier intellectual and literary outlet for liberal, kosher-conservative writing and “Judeo-Christian” rhetoric, placing a cordon sanitaire around all explicit racial/pro-white views and counter-semetic discussions, whilst maintaining a pro-Zionist stance. When CIA money ceased in the late 60s, prominent supporters like Isi Leibler stepped up to keep it afloat. Jewish editors and prominent contributors abound in Quadrant’s history; Frank Knopfelmacher, Heinz Arndt, Sam Lipski, and Robert Manne - each more antiracist than the last.

The Hidden Figures of Australian Multiculturalism: #4 Henry Richard Krygier Publisher, activist and founder in 1954 of the Australian arm of the Congress for Cultural Freedom, the Jewish led anti-communist organisation later discovered to be funded by the CIA. Co-founder of Quadrant magazine in 1956, Krygier served as publisher and long-time “ideas man”, taking direct inspiration from Irving Kristol’s Encounter in the UK. When CIA money ceased in the late 60s and funds became scarce, prominent supporters like Isi Leibler stepped up to keep it afloat. As expected, Jewish editors and prominent contributors abound in Quadrant’s history; Frank Knopfelmacher, Heinz Arndt, Sam Lipski, and Robert Manne - each more antiracist than the last.

“The value of this book for readers of The Occidental Observer lies principally in understanding the intellectual journey of the author and discerning the potential for the emergence of a popular left-wing critique of the EU in the Anglosphere and beyond… Despite the myriad of anti-racist measures, tolerance initiatives, and hate speech laws that encompass the modern EU, Kundnani has turned on the European Union because it is just still too White, too Western. After all, the EU’s history is rooted in Europe and much of its historical and present-day motivations are the defence of European people and Western values. That alone is enough to condemn it in Kundnani’s eyes.”

My latest book review for The Occidental Observer: The Problematic History of the European Union: Review of ‘Eurowhiteness’ Are the anti-whites turning on the European Union? https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/01/24/the-problematic-history-of-the-european-union-review-of-eurowhiteness/

No one is happy with the way Musk has handled X/Twitter since his purchase. The left is fuming for allowing free speech, the right for not allowing enough. And yet there is only one group he goes out of his way to appease and make amends with…

Conquered. @stayfreeworld

No one is happy with the way Musk has handled X/Twitter since his purchase. The left is fuming for allowing free speech, the right for not allowing enough. And yet there is only one group he goes out of his way to appease and make amends with…