894
订阅者
+124 小时
+157 天
+8930 天
帖子存档
درست همچون ثروت که دیگر نه با جلوههای ثروت بلکه با گردش پنهان سرمایه نظری سنجیده میشود، جنگ نیز نه با میزان جنگ کردن بلکه با وقوع نظریاش در فضایی انتزاعی، الکترونیکی و اطلاعاتی، برآورد میشود، همان فضایی که در آن سرمایه نیز به گردش درمیآید.
این عبارت "خایمال فلسطین" هم چرندی هست که از ریشه مردوده، خایمالی یعنی برای رسیدن به منفعت مادی چاپلوسی کنی، از کسایی که خودشون آواره شدن، دارن قحطی میکشن و تحت یک نسلکشی تمام عیار هستند چه منفعتی میتونه به من برسه که صحبت کردن از رنجشون چاپلوسی برای منافع تعبیر بشه؟ اتفاقا برعکسه و کسایی که از این عبارت استفاده میکنن خودشون خایمالهای واقعی هستن
It would be too easy to say that a Picasso painting in a factory will
never abolish the division of labour and that the multiplication of
multiples, were that to be achieved, will never abolish social division and
the transcendence of Culture. The illusion of the ideologues of the
Multiple (let us not speak here of the conscious or subconscious
speculators among both artists and dealers, though they are by far the
largest group involved) and of cultural dissemination or promotion more
generally is, nonetheless, an instructive one. Their noble effort to democ-
ratize culture or, where the designers are concerned, 'to create beautiful
objects for the greatest number', visibly meets with failure - or with such
commercial success that it becomes suspect as a result, which amounts to
the same thing. But this contradiction is merely apparent: it exists
because these fine souls stubbornly insist on regarding Culture as a
universal, while seeking, at the same time, to disseminate it in the form of finite
objects (whether unique or produced in their thousands). In so doing,
they are merely delivering up to the logic of consumption (i.e. to the
manipulation of signs) certain contents or symbolic activities which were
not previously subject to that logic. Producing multiple works does not
in itself imply any 'vulgarization' or 'loss of quality': what happens is
that, as 'mass-produced' objects, works so produced become effectively objects of the same kind 'as the pair of stockings and the garden chair',
and acquire their meaning in relation to those things. They no longer
stand opposed, as works and as semantic substance - as open significa-
tions - to other finite objects. They have become finite objects themselves
and are part of the package, the constellation of accessories by which the
'socio-cultural' standing of the average citizen is determined. This, at
least, is what would happen in the best of cases, where everyone really
did have access to them. For the moment, although they are not artworks
any longer, these pseudo-works are nonetheless rare objects, economic-
ally or 'psychologically' inaccessible to most people and sustaining, as
distinctive objects, a slightly expanded parallel Culture market.
Jean Baudrillard, The Consumer Society
پشت اکراین رو خالی کرد، رو گرینلند هم که مدتهاست شق کرده، Rojava رو هم که رها کرد جلوی یه مشت داعشی کت و شلوار پوش. ولی نه قطعا برای ایرانیها وارد جنگ میشه.
زن (ایران) و شوهر (اسرائیل) دعوا کنند
ابلهان (کسایی که میگن امشب میزنن تموم میشه) باور کنند
تا قطر، عمان، ترکیه، پاکستان، روسیه، اسرائیل، آمریکا کفن نشود
این وطن وطن نشود
