ch
Feedback
Team Petrovsky

Team Petrovsky

前往频道在 Telegram

Vaccination science

显示更多
3 627
订阅者
无数据24 小时
-117 天
-6030 天

数据加载中...

相似频道
无数据
有任何问题?请刷新页面或联系我们的客服
标签云
无数据
有任何问题?请刷新页面或联系我们的客服
进出提及
---
---
---
---
---
---
吸引订阅者
七月 '25
七月 '250
在1个频道中
六月 '25
+1
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '250
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '250
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '25
+6
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '25
+6
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '25
+2
在1个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '24
+4
在1个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '24
+8
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '240
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '240
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '24
+2
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '24
+1
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '24
+7
在1个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '24
+29
在6个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '24
+9
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '240
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '24
+2
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '24
+1
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '23
+15
在2个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '230
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '23
+3
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '23
+1
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '23
+2
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '23
+4
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '23
+20
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '23
+1
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '23
+5
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '23
+1
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '23
+1
在0个频道中
Get PRO
一月 '23
+5
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十二月 '22
+6
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十一月 '22
+6
在0个频道中
Get PRO
十月 '22
+15
在0个频道中
Get PRO
九月 '22
+5
在0个频道中
Get PRO
八月 '22
+31
在0个频道中
Get PRO
七月 '22
+15
在0个频道中
Get PRO
六月 '22
+31
在0个频道中
Get PRO
五月 '22
+44
在0个频道中
Get PRO
四月 '22
+96
在0个频道中
Get PRO
三月 '22
+892
在0个频道中
Get PRO
二月 '22
+6 233
在0个频道中
日期
订阅者增长
提及
频道
01 七月0
频道帖子
Zinulin makes a commitment to wellness and freedom of speech   The fight for academic freedom and scientific integrity has not been an easy or cheap one, particularly given the power and might of the government forces, health institutions, scientific bodies and the media willing to do anything to prevent any Covid truths coming out. Given the extent to which they sought to mislead and lie to the public throughout the pandemic, exposure of the truth would mean no politicians involved would be electable and none of the scientific institutions or media involved would have any future credibility.   But it is essential that the fight for the truth continue including in the courts, difficult though it may be given the apparent bias of the judiciary who largely seem to be playing from the government playbook, maybe not surprising given that most judges are now essentially political appointments.   Many of you may not be aware but I independently run a small health and wellness company, Zinulin Pty Ltd, that I set up when I became aware as a spin off of Nikolai’s research that a natural plant-based fiber called inulin had some extraordinary health promoting properties but was not easily available to Australians. Inulin has been scientifically proven to have a powerful ability to nourish beneficial gut bacteria, improve calcium uptake, regulate bowel function, reduce whole body inflammation, and support overall wellness. I set up Zinulin ® so Australians could easily access and try this remarkable natural product for themselves, in convenient packs available to order through the Zinulin® website https://www.zinulin.com/ as well as through select pharmacies and health food shops.   I know many of you have generously donated funds to support Nikolai’s ongoing battle with the government for reinstatement after having lost everything for his public comments on the futility and harms of Covid vaccine mandates.   Zinulin’s mission is to support wellness, counter to the health industry and big pharma who prefer to profit from supporting the concept of sickness. It is no secret that big pharma has been constantly lobbying governments to curtail the wellness industry, for fear it will cut into their massive profits from promoting sickness treatments. Zinulin® itself experienced this soon after its creation when a large pharma competitor selling an inferior product lobbied the health regulators to try and shut us down (sounds just like Covid doesn’t it!). They were ultimately not successful, but this shows just how important it is that we fight to protect academic freedom including to promote wellness.   Zinulin® pledges to donate to the GoFundMe campaign $1.00 for every packet sold through the website in the next 6 months to support the fight for academic freedom.  If you haven’t tried it before, there might never be a better time to support your wellness, while supporting our campaign for academic freedom.   I am happy to post our supporters a free sample of Zinulin® if you contact me either via sharen@zinulin.com or through the contact page on the Zinulin website.    

2
The Federal election will be held on 3 May and South Australia will go to the polls on 21 March 2026. Will either government be held to account for the civil rights infringements throughout the pandemic?   The legal battles continue in the Federal Court and SAET seeking justice for Nikolai and the Vaxine team. There have been wins and disappointments in the preliminary proceedings, but notably our team have held their ground with failed attempts by SA health to evict vital ongoing cancer vaccine trials from Flinders Medical Centre. As emphasized by the trial judges, these preliminary outcomes have no bearing on the ultimate merit and outcome of our case. Our legal team are confident particularly given damning evidence that has come to light through various Freedom of Information requests. They also expect additional highly damning evidence to come to light once discovery takes place. They are also looking forward to the opportunity to get relevant senior management in the box for cross-examination, with the aim amongst other things to expose how senior University officials sought to deceive the court so as to remove orders that were protecting Vaxine's ongoing research and animals.  It might be immoral and unethical for the Defendants to seek to destroy valuable medical research including human cancer trials, but it is criminal for them to commit perjury and breach animal welfare laws.   While the law can be an ass and there is no guarantee the relevant authorities will pursue criminal breaches by senior SA officials, the public are entitled to know just how unscrupulous and dishonest those in charge of our major South Australian public institutions are. Documents obtained by myself, Sarah Game, Frank Pangallo, Rex Patrick and others under freedom of information nicely show how these bodies deliberately sought to destroy Nikolai and Australia's only successful COVID-19 vaccine to assist them in forcing the genetic mRNA vaccines on every Australian with no concern as to the harms these might cause.  It will be fascinating what they have to say to justify their actions when they finally are all subpoenaed for cross-examination in full view of the public and the media.   Notably, a professional film crew with secured funding have approached us to produce a documentary highlighting the malfeasance of Flinders University, SA Health and other government bodies in their attempts to destroy Nikolai and his COVID-19 vaccine so they could pursue their mRNA vaccine mandates. Filming of the documentary is expected to be undertaken later in April with the possibility some excerpts might even be able to be released in time for the Federal election.  The plan will be to submit the documentary once completed to a number of prestigious film competitions for showing thereby ensuring it reaches a global audience. Stay tuned!
1 574
3
https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/new-evidence-of-dna-contamination
1 802
4
Nik was very pleased to help with this documentary exposing real vaccine injuries. https://globaltruth.network/Dissection
1 087
5
Seems like the people of Australia need to step up this year to regain some of the power given to bureaucrats and regulators. https://open.substack.com/pub/markneugebauer/p/nikolai-petrovsky-then-now-and-what?r=yi4k6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
1 711
6
Is students can do it how is it that the TGA is incapable of measuring DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines? https://jhss.scholasticahq.com/article/127890-a-rapid-detection-method-of-replication-competent-plasmid-dna-from-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-for-quality-control
1 901
7
Nikolai and I would like to wish you all a very safe, happy and a Christmas full of good cheer.
1 926
8
For those that don’t have Facebook here is the link on Nikolai’s LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7273332296559017984/
2 219
9
The tide is turning … https://www.facebook.com/share/v/15pD7z58Ti/?mibextid=D5vuiz
1 831
10
https://youtu.be/qFHjW8KqqPk
1 545
11
Stop the social media minimum age ban. Worried this is going to lead further interference between parent and child. https://freespeechunion.au/stopageverification/
1 629
12
This vindicates everything Nikolai has been saying …. https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2024.12.04-SSCP-FINAL-REPORT-ANS.pdf
1 577
13
Should Nikolai run for the Senate? https://www.linkedin.com/posts/petrovsky_australia-is-headed-into-a-troubled-space-activity-7268444893050482688-RV_4?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
2 034
14
If I had to guess, there may be some index hopping from Pfizer samples on this run which get mistaken for samples that were Moderna vaxxed. Important to keep an open mind as very few Pfizer and Moderna vials have actually been sequenced and its not safe to assume every lot used the same plasmid. They were in fact DNase-ing these lots and likely assumed no one would ever know if they swapped plasmids…and if they got caught, they would have a liability shield to protect them. I have started to download these samples to see if they in fact have the same Sequencer Chip ID in the FastQ files. Its alot of data and this may take some time to confirm. Keep in mind these are studies looking at Blood which has a high turn over rate. I bet if you looked in Lymph nodes and other tissues like tumors, you would find persistence that lasted much longer than this. In other news, Phillip Buckhaults treated human organoids with vaccines and found the DNA to be sticking around for a month across multiple cell divisions and washes. This is similar to the results we saw with OvCar3 cell lines. We don’t know if this DNA is integrated or episomal but that probably doesn’t matter as Kwon et al teaches us that chronic stimulation of the cGAS-STING pathway can lead to oncogenesis. So once again, the fact checkers are in retreat. It’s not there! You eat DNA all day long! Fine, It’s there but it wont get into the cell! So what if it gets into the cell, it will be destroyed! It will never get into the nucleus even though there is no nucleus during cell division! And Masks work! Vaccines stop transmission! Misinformation kills Grandma! You have seen this movie before. It’s ending isn’t pretty and better    
2 142
15
The inserted X post from Phillip Burkhault adds to this showing the plasmid DNA can get into normal cells and last for weeks – this does not prove it has integrated – this would require the cellular DNA to be sequenced to show the added plasmid DNA has indeed become integrated. Nevertheless, it shows the potential for this.   Whatever the explanation, those who declined to have any mRNA vaccines can at least sleep easy at night knowing they have not been injected with any potentially toxic substance containing unknown levels of unknown contaminants, the antithesis of a quality drug product, and the continued approval of which demonstrates the incapacity of the TGA to do their job. Just as RFK plans to take a broom to the FDA so our government should be taking a broom to the TGA. Now Found in the blood and in Organoid Chakraborty had the curiosity most of our regulators lack. He didn’t have to lift a pipette. Just had to know how to download data from the NCBI SRA and scan it for sequences that others don’t care to look for. He covers 3 Studies. One of the studies likely underrepresents the DNA as the study used a Qiagen protocol to capture RNAwhich selects against DNA. This would explain the high Spike to Vector sequencing ratio observed. In other words, the study favored capturing RNA and may have even used a DNaseI in that protocol so its safe to assume the DNA loads, when measured with a kit designed to capture DNA would actually be much higher. The list is much longer than this but see his paper for the fill list of patients. The second study also used this Qiagen kit. The 3rd study also used Qiagen kits. This one has some low numbers of SV40 reads in patients that received Moderna but notice the Vectors reads are much higher than the SV40 reads. These should be the same in count. Also notice the SRR ids are sequential and this was run on a sequencer that has such a large sequencing capacity that barcodes were most likely used to pool all of these samples on the same run. That means that index hopping is in play. Although the sequencing used is an MGI sequencer which is known to how lower index hopping rates than Illumina, they are not zero.
1 285
16
So should we trust the TGA’s attempts at reassurance and ignore the warnings of the many scientists who insist the mRNA vaccines have excess levels of DNA contamination which could prove harmful?   Enter the study by Chakraboty that is described below and attached.  Ingeniously he used the sequence data generated by 3 clinical trials including the one performed in Adelaide to look for evidence of contamination in the RNA sequence data extracted from the patient’s own blood pre and post vaccination. What better proof that the mRNA vaccines contained contaminating DNA then to detect it in the blood of recently vaccinated subjects!  Similar concept to testing for mercury poising by measuring mercury in a person’s blood as opposed to just trying to measure it in the water they may have been drinking and getting it from.   Remarkably, Chakraboty not only found sequences corresponding to the spike protein mRNA in the blood (showing the method was working), but also found sequences corresponding to the plasmid DNA known to be contaminating the mRNA including key sequences in those plasmids including the SV40 promoter and kanamycin resistance genes.   Interestingly and as an aside this immediately puts to the lie to several claims made by fact checkers and bodies like the TGA.  They claim that almost all the mRNA vaccine stays locally in the injection site and very little if any goes elsewhere in the body. This data shows that the vaccine components are readily detectable in the blood just 24 hours after injection. Indeed, if they claim that the vast majority of the vaccine is still local at this time, this makes the detected contamination in the blood all the more worrying as maybe this indicates hundred or thousands times more contaminant would be found at the injection site?  It also refutes claims by the Red Cross etc that mRNA doesn’t get into the blood- it clearly does almost immediately after injection and hence will be in donor blood.  They also claim that mRNA is broken down in seconds to minutes. As shown by other published studies spike mRNA is still easily detectable in the blood 2 weeks after immunisation, which would be impossible if what they claimed to be the half-life of the mRNA was in any way true.   So why be so concerned about the Adelaide data? Well in all the other studies the amount of contamination found was extremely low relative to the amount of spike mRNA – that is what you would expect. The TGA claim that the amount of contaminating DNA is less than one thousandth the amount of mRNA – a lot of data out there says that is not true, but maybe it is still less than one hundredth the level of mRNA. So you would expect vector reads to be much less than the number of spike reads. But look at the Adelaide data – the vector reads are much more than the number of spike reads. Was there more contaminant than active vaccine in the vials? One interesting possibility raised by Chakraboty is that the plasmid DNA has also been converted to mRNA in the process so that it is actually in contaminating mRNA in the vial – this seems amongst the most plausible as the blood was treated with DNAse to break down any DNA before being sequenced.  But why wasn’t this similarly seen to the same extent in the other study data – did it reflect when they were done as the Adelaide trial was in 2021, whereas the other studies seem to come from 2022, 2023. Is so this would seem to suggest that the early mRNA vaccines may have been full of contaminants that were progressively removed as the companies got more expertise in making them.  While such an improvement might seem admirable, it is completely unacceptable from a regulatory perspective as it is no longer the same vaccine. Hence it should go back through the whole development process and trials. Even although the newer product might be purer what would happen for example if the impurities were responsible for the effectiveness of the early batches – this would mean the modified purer vaccine is no longer effective.  
1 181
17
Ignore the cat cartoon at the start – this article alerts to some serious scientific questions to do with contamination mRNA vaccines. What is most concerning of all is that some of the data comes from individuals receiving mRNA vaccines and being experimented on here in Adelaide, by a Flinders University/SAMHRI team.   Little did they know when jabbing these study participants with Pfizer mRNA vaccines that their raw data which they were obliged to make publicly available when publishing their paper, could become the smoking gun to prove the mRNA vaccines had major DNA and old RNA contamination.   While several scientists around the world have published work showing DNA levels in vials of Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines are far in excess of acceptable levels, and have testified on this to US congressional hearings, the TGA on their website have tried to dismiss these reports as misinformation, claiming the know better. https://www.tga.gov.au/news/media-releases/addressing-misinformation-about-excessive-dna-mrna-vaccines    The TGA similarly claimed the AstraZeneca adenovirus vaccine was perfectly safe until it was clearly shown by other more astute European regulators not to be, after which TGA were forced to belatedly change their tune, while still continuing to promote its use.    Why is the TGA so determined to have everyone believe there is no problem and why is the question of DNA contamination such an important one? There are multiple issues at play here, which if this is proven would mean that the TGA is incapable of doing their job.   Firstly, if DNA contamination limits in the mRNA vials exceed the prescribed limits, then it means that all doses of mRNA are not fit for purpose as their quality system has failed. If a test for one contaminant is inaccurate, then what about the other tests performed to ensure the vaccines are of adequate quality to be released. Failure of a key test means that contaminants could be widely varying from batch to batch without the manufacturer or the regulator being aware of this. This is a very serious quality system failure.  A competent regulator upon recognising such an issue is compelled to withdraw all supplies of the product until the problem could be characterised and fixed.  The TGA clearly does not want to go there, as this product recall would be very public, and the public would soon become aware that the TGA had not properly investigating the issue when it was first raised.     Second, the DNA contaminants might have harmful effects if they exceed the regulatory limits. DNA is inflammatory and hence excessive doses can cause side effects including fever, myalgia and fatigue. Hence if some batches of mRNA had high levels of DNA contamination, then this could explain the reports that some batches of the mRNA vaccines were associated with a much higher rate of serious side effects and post-vaccination deaths than other batches.   Third, there is a risk that contaminating DNA might get integrated into the genome of the vaccine recipient’s cells. Initially, it was claimed by the authorities and fact checkers that mRNA vaccines cannot get integrated into the genome as this would first require that the mRNA be converted to DNA, which it was claimed could not happen in the human body (in fact this was proven not to be strictly true as endogenous retroviruses in the human genome upon activation by inflammation can induce reverse transcriptase required to convert mRNA to DNA).  But the real problem is that if the mRNA is contaminated with DNA then that DNA doesn’t require conversion to get inserted into the cellular genome, it is already in the right form. This is one reason the allowable amount of DNA contamination is kept very low to minimise such risk.   Fourth, the greater the amount of DNA contamination, the greater the risk that complete pieces of DNA plasmids are present including for example the SV40 promoter which can more readily cause issues such as mutagenesis if they get accidentally inserted into the genome.  
1 174
18
As promised - information recently received and reviewed by The Team - please ignore any grammatical errors as it was done late at night.
1 126
19
Please share - so many people may be interested in the fact that the tides are turning
1 415
20
This does beg the question of, if the Appeal wins then will Malinauskas and Picton tender their resignations, along with the CEOs of SA Health and the local health networks who all pushed through this mandate and the staff terminations, just as Alan Joyce and the board were forced to do at Qantas when they were found to have acted unlawfully? Could Kerrie Freeman, the CEO of SALHN until last week, have seen the writing on the wall for SA Health when she decided to jump ship to become CEO of Brisbane City Council on a comfortable $800k salary? While she may think she has escaped, Freeman will be subpoenaed back to Adelaide for cross-examination in Prof Petrovsky's legal actions to quiz her on her role in targeting him for acting as an expert witness in the Judicial review and the Teague case. It will be intriguing how she plans to defend against this given she put this in writing when seeking to dismiss him. Notably, the targeting of an expert witness is not only in contempt of court, but it is also a criminal offence under section 116B of the SAET Act. Many other senior SA Health, SALHN and Flinders University officials will be subpoenaed for cross-examination in those proceedings to prove their complicity in the unlawful targeting of Prof Petrovsky. The truth will thereby finally come out and the perpetrators will be visible to all. Hopefully all in time for the next state election. It would take very adept footwork by Peter Malinauskas and Chris Picton to try to change the state legislation to try and render such criminal prosecutions void. In any case, are they so ready to sacrifice their own political careers to save a few SA Health bureaucrats acting beyond the law? The SA govt currently have an opportunity to show they are honourable people, by accepting fault on behalf of SA Health and working to set things right and compensating those harmed by their actions, including Prof. Petrovsky. Or Peter Malinauskas and Chris Picton can continue to support the dirty tricks of SA Health and their lawyers and see what voters think about this. Maybe it is time for everyone to write to them again and remind them of their responsibilities as the SA government leaders? The federal and state elections are bearing down. Now is the time for SA politicians to show their mettle and tackle SA Health. A good place to start in addition to compensating the victims, might be an independent inquiry into hospital ramping, the proton therapy debacle and the conduct of SA Health throughout the pandemic.
2 239