Election Data Analyzer

This is what happens when "students" are allowed to use a campus library center building as the mailing address on the voter roll. No unit or apartment or PO Box. Just an address. 58 "students" out of 340 get to use this generic address as the place where ballots are mailed to, the rest at least have the Apartment #. I have not visited this site but I am presuming that this campus center is where mail delivered.

Cool kids who like the shiny machines like to make us feel stupid. We are the majority as you can see above. I want my paper ballots back! 😂

If you are not familiar with the work of Dr Robert Epstein, I would suggest you look him up and consider what he has to say. He recently conducted a podcast on a very popular platform. You can find it. I'll summarize it this way. The surveillance society Eisenhower warned about is here. Ever heard of Brave browser? Brave is to browsers what Paper Ballot Counting is to Elections. Yes, browsers have to do with election integrity, as he explains.

I posted this chart above several days ago without comment at the conclusion of my U/(D+R) case study. I look at this and see one of the most disturbing charts I have ever posted. I can also produce similar charts for 12 counties in this state over the same time period. I wanted to see what others thought about it but, nobody has commented at this point. I am in the process of seeing if I can produce similar trends in other states but the data is hard to come by for many reasons. Can anyone offer an explanation as to why a voter registration roll over a 3 year period would look like this EITHER based on random human behavior OR manipulation of the roll? I am not a statistician or a sociologist who tracks human behavior so if you can explain it, chime in.

But wait, there is more...Michael Steele, former RNC Chair, is the Chairman of the Board for this group that advocates end to end internet voting. It is being studied. Let's fix 2020 before we decide what to do next. https://usvotefoundation-drupal.s3.amazonaws.com/prod/E2EVIV_full_report.pdf

https://civicdesign.org/projects/remote-ballot-marking/ Coming to a precinct near you....Remote Marking Ballot Systems...translated from Communism to plain English...."fill-out your ballot at home electronically, print it at home and mail it in." I am sure no problems could result from that, nothing to see here. The tag line of this organization is "Democracy is a Design Problem". Like the Patriotism in that statement? They are funded in part by CTCL, the same organization who funded the drop boxes making it possible for Mules to harvest ballots in GA. This all about implementing a system of surveillance and control. Now the Mules will be able to "help you fill out the electronic ballot at home, print it and mail it in." Imagine the adjudication problems created by printing ballots at home? This is insanity.

Thus concludes the Unique Name Part rabbit hole case study digression. Try this at home. The name analysis guru (not me ) claims this is a good way to find phantom voters. I have no idea if it is true. All of these charts where produced with EDA out of the box. Getting to the list of registered voter subset with unique name parts was an ad hoc spreadsheet anyone can do brute force. I then took those registrants and put them through an EDA analysis. Back to U/(D+R) research....for those of you following along.

Graph 6 (last one): Look at how these Unique Name Part Folk cluster in Unique Name Part Precincts. There are 38 of them in one precinct. Gee, maybe knowing that ahead of time in a canvass effort would make better use of limited resources?

Graph 5: Unique Name Part Folks really like voting - 84% of them voted. Does that make sense?

Graph 4: Slightly more females then males. There are a few X genders as well.

Graph 3: Same registration trend surges in this group before an election.

Graph 2: These are counts per address. The address is not shown. A bit difficult to read, but amazingly enough, there are residences where 3 registered voters are living together and all of them have unique name parts in that county. Think about that....Statisticians, please advise on probability. There are many households with 2 registered voters with unique name parts. Seems really odd to me.

Three Unique Name Parts Population Continuation (from above Graph 1: Not a lot of REP in this group of 2,206.

New Rabbit Hole Exercise: I had no intention of going down the name analysis rabbit hole, but, I stumbled upon a lecture by a well known name analysis guru yesterday and I had to try it out for myself. I took a population of ~450,000 registrants and set up a table with Voter ID, last, middle, first. I then developed a list of unique last, unique middle and unique first names from that list. In other words, those name PARTS occur only once. I then looked up the voter ID for each unique last, unique middle and unique first. Then I combined the IDs from the 3 lists into a single list and counted the number of times the ID showed up in the combined list to get the above results. What this table above is saying is that the name PARTS of 2% of the people are ALL unique! 15% have 2 parts that are unique and so on. This name analysis guru claims that looking at those 2% could be useful to find bad registration records. Try this one at home....I don't have this in EDA at this time.

This is pretty interesting. A population of about 450,000 has these very "special" first, middle and last name values included which are related to dates. I don't mean to insult anyone with the last name "May" or the first name "June", those are quite lovely. But in this PERFECT ERIC database, there are people with the first name THURSDAY, the middle name WEDNESDAY and the last name SEPTEMBER. I am not saying that is one person by the way....I suppose it could be possible? Or maybe this is just an example of poor database management practices, a lack of data integrity and we should dump it all and start over? 🤨