Election Data Analyzer

Help Gold Star Mom and Election Patriot Tina Peters Raise Money for Colorado Recount in Stolen Election- MUST REACH GOAL BY TOMORROW! -- VIDEO https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/breaking-help-gold-star-mom-election-patriot-tina-peters-raise-money-colorado-recount-due-tomorrow/

Hello folks...I am going to ask you consider something I have never done before. Make a donation. Not to me but to Tina Peters recount initiative. I have provided the EDA workbook as a public service and will never ask for a donation to obtain a copy. If you have used EDA, please consider this important cause. Thank you. 🇺🇸👇👇

E-Pollbook Test “Protocol” from PA This reference is posted on the EAC website. Does this inspire confidence that e-pollbooks are not being mis-used? I would hardly call this a test protocol. https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/eac_assets/1/28/Pennsylvania%20EPB%20Test%20Protocol.pdf

Israel Sells Voting Equipment….But Doesn’t Use It Themselves Israel counts votes by hand. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/why-israel-doesnt-use-electronic-voting-and-how-hackable-would-it-be-571154 https://www.timesofisrael.com/final-votes-being-tallied-with-likud-blue-and-white-still-neck-and-neck/ Israel is home to Radion Electronics that makes the panel PC used in D-Suite for ballot marking. https://electronics.radion.co.il/product/hid-21v-btx/ https://t.me/electiondataanalyzer/1331 How ironic.....

Election Machine Hacks from the 1990s This is clever. Voting a ballot a specific way (like overvoting) that when fed into the machine triggers hidden code (aka a Trojan Horse). We The People: If we can’t see the code, how do we know this is NOT happening? Elected Official: The logic and accuracy test ensure votes are counted correctly. We The People: Uh, you ignored my question, shall I ask it again? “How would a sophisticated vote-fixer go about rigging an election? Ronnie Dugger interviewed one expert who explained how someone could fix the vote of any candidate. Computer scientist, Michael Shamos, PhD of Carnegie-Mellon University in Pittsburgh, had been a consultant for the Pennsylvania Bureau of Elections during the eighties. He was a major critic of the CES (now Business Records Corporation) Votomatic punch-card computer-counting system, which he described as "a security nightmare, open to tampering in a multitude of ways." Shamos viewed as a very real threat the same scenario presented by Howard Strauss: that a vote-fixer could walk into the polls and vote a specially prepared ballot, which, when it arrived at a central vote-counting site, would be fed into the computer and would proceed to "change the current vote total for any candidate desired." Reference http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/election2k/computerized_voting/pandora.htm

From 2015. https://www.reuters.com/article/russia-soros/russia-bans-george-soros-foundation-as-state-security-threat-idUSL1N13P22Y20151130

Arizona's next Governor has a stern warning for anyone trying to steal the election: "You're gonna get caught. We've got eyes, we've got ears, and we have lawyers all over. And our law enforcement is on top of it. And know this: this next election, if you're caught cheating, when I'm Governor, there's not gonna be a slap on the wrist. We're going after people who stole our vote.... we're watching you, you are being watched, and there will be hell to pay." 💥

Incoming. Boom 💥 Boom 💥👇

Written by a true Patriot, Sidney Powell... https://defendingtherepublic.org/democrats-alleged-votes-changed-by-secret-code-in-machines/

Election Night Gatekeepers https://electionnightgatekeepers.com/election-night-gatekeepers/ This organization has been around since 1996!! They have been advocating for hand counted paper ballots at the precinct since 1996. They coined the term Election Night Gatekeepers to include: ES&S, Hart, Dominion, CBS, NBC, ABC, AP, CNN, FOX, RNC, DNC and something you may have never heard of, the National Election Pool (NEP) which is jointly owned by the news media groups. NEP provides, apparently, "fake" voter polling to justify the eventual outcome. https://ballotpedia.org/National_Election_Pool Had I come across this site prior to Nov 4th, 2020, I would have questioned the accuracy of some of these assertions. Not so much anymore. The more I look into the history of election machines, it is apparent the issues we are trying to address now are not new. In fact, they are international concerns that are decades old, going back to the 1960’s. The fact that many of us were not aware of these shenanigans is humbling and troublesome. What exactly were we paying attention to back then? Why MIGHT it different this time? I would offer this….the scale of the Awakening. No longer is this concern about election machines a “drop in the ocean”. The Awakening to this system of “Trade Secrets”, “Proprietary Equipment” and “Black Boxes” is becoming the Ocean. It took 2020 to make this happen. I am convinced of that now.

110 Articles Affirm America's Computerized Voting System Is Online, Compromised, and Vulnerable To Hackers: Documented, Linked, and Quoted "The majority of the U.S. election system is programmed by local county election officials or third-party vendors, who are plugging previously-used USB drives into computers connected to the internet, before plugging those same USB drives into the optical scanners, tabulators, and voting machines that collect, count, and determine election results." In 2019, the Associated Press reported that the vast majority of 10,000 election jurisdictions nationwide, including numerous swing states, were still using Windows 7 or older operating systems to create ballots, program voting machines, tally votes, and report counts. Windows 7 reached its “end of life” on Jan. 14, 2020, meaning Microsoft stopped providing technical support and producing “patches” to fix software vulnerabilities. Furthermore, not only are U.S. elections being programmed on computers running out-of-date software, but voting machine manufacturers have also installed remote-access software and wireless modems connecting voting machines directly to the internet. NBC News reported ten months before the 2020 election that ES&S, the largest U.S. election machine vendor, had installed at least 14,000 modems to connect their voting machines to the internet even though many election security experts had previously warned that voting machines with modems were vulnerable to hackers. Dominion Voting Systems, the second-largest U.S. election machine vendor, which has given public presentations acknowledging their use of modems in their voting machines, was also discovered to be running remote-access software during the 2020 election: In Georgia, 20-year election worker, Susan Voyles, testified that Dominion Voting Systems employees “operated remotely” on her ballot-marking devices and poll pads after the team experienced some technical problems with their machines. In Wisconsin, the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), headed by retired state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, also found that Dominion and ES&S voting machines were online and connected to the internet. In Michigan, attorney and Secretary of State candidate, Matt Deperno, discovered a Telit LE910-SV1 modem chip embedded in the motherboard of an ES&S DS200 voting machine. Through these modems, hackers could theoretically intercept results as they’re transmitted on election night — or, worse, use the modem connections to reach back into voting machines or the election management systems to install malware, change software, or alter official results. Therefore, not only are hackers able to penetrate elections through vulnerable USB cards and election management systems, but also through the very voting machines themselves. This isn’t a problem exclusive to elections — all computers are hackable — and that is why election security experts have always recommended hand-marked paper ballots and rigorous post-election audits." https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/110-articles-affirm-americas-computerized @KanekoaTheGreat

Folks, This article was written in 1988. It describes election machine problems going back to the 1960’s. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1988/11/07/counting-votes Here is an excerpt from a person who was permitted to look at the source code of the technology back then. "The only thing that I'm restricted from doing is telling you exactly the code that's in the program," he said. "It had lots of fascinating little nooks and crannies hidden around in it that no one has ever let me talk about. There are at least a half-dozen places, maybe a few less, where you could lay in a Trojan horse in that source code—lay in routines to do whatever you wanted to in an election—because there's code in that system that shouldn't be there, is not being used, is worthless to the operation of the system. It can be replaced with anything you want it to be." Had Nunn found a trapdoor; that is, a place in a program where one can break down its security system and emerge undetected deep inside the program? "Yes. There is one." And had he found "wait loops'' in the program which conceivably could control outcomes, or "Christmas trees"—Nunn's term for surprise packages in a program? "They're all there. There are wait loops there. There are routines that are not documented in the manual and, from every way I can determine, do not work."

From 1992, what we are dealing with is nothing new. This book claims that it actually goes back to the 1960's.

Ready for another red pill? 👇👇

Why did the supposedly “impartial” and “non-partisan” voting company Dominion donate $50,000 to Hillary Clinton in 2014? Asking for a country… @WILFmoseder

Give Us the Source Code – Jamie Raskin and the Gaurdian Agree https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/22/us-voting-machine-private-companies-voter-registration “But the dominant private sector makes that difficult. Not only are the companies largely free from public records requests, they are often asked to investigate or police themselves, according to election law expert Candice Hoke.” “It is unheard of, for instance in a bank, that if they have anomalies or a potential hack that they need to investigate, that they are supposed to call the software licensor or the software company and get them to examine their own software and decide whether their software was hacked or flawed in some way,” Hoke said. “Absolutely preposterous. And yet we allow that in our elections.” Jamie Raskin even introduced a bill the H.R.6435 in 2018 - Election Vendor Security Act https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6435/text

Give us the Source Code for the Election Machines In the Philippines for the May 2022 election, public source code review was permitted. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1155553 The stakeholders will review the following: the Election Management System (EMS); the Vote-Counting Machine (VCM); the Consolidated Canvassing System (CCS); and all other related systems programmed and developed by the provider. Source Code review was amended into in Philippine law. https://www.set.gov.ph/resources/election-law/republic-act-no-9369/ Why does the Philippines have a public source code review provision but the US does not?

If you want to go down a rabbit hole, look no further than Smartmatic in the Phillipines. https://www.rappler.com/nation/elections/103735-philippines-voting-machines-omr-china/