Law Prep Tutorial - CLAT Coaching

🚨WATCH NOW!🚨 📢 Confused about how to give and analyze mock tests for CLAT 2026? This video is your full roadmap — from taking your first mock to doing smart analysis that boosts your score! Learn how to track your speed, accuracy, spot mistakes, and use mocks as powerful prep tools. Link : https://youtu.be/D4rxi6C5m3w

🚨WATCH NOW!🚨 Struggling with Analytical Reasoning for CLAT 2026? This video is your complete guide to cracking AR in the last 5 months! Learn how to plan your prep smartly with a topic-wise schedule, daily targets, and practice techniques. We’ll walk you through the most important question types, common traps to avoid, and how to build both speed and accuracy. 🔗Link : https://youtu.be/CKBLavKaclQ

🧑‍⚖️ Case Title: Microfibers Pvt. Ltd. v. Yes Bank Ltd. & Ors. ⚖️ Summary: The Bombay High Court held that a bank could not insist on Aadhaar for opening an account post the Supreme Court’s ruling in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy. The Court awarded ₹50,000 in compensation to Microfibers Pvt. Ltd. for delay in account opening, which caused loss of rental income. 📌 Key Points: 🔹Petitioner applied for account in Jan 2018; Yes Bank denied it citing lack of Aadhaar despite interim SC orders. 🔹Final SC judgment in Sept 2018 ruled Aadhaar not mandatory, yet account was opened only in Jan 2019. 🔹Petitioner claimed ₹10 lakhs in damages due to inability to rent premises during the delay. 🔹Court found the claim exaggerated but acknowledged unjustified delay after Sept 2018. 🔹Given bank’s inaction and personal hardships cited, Court directed Yes Bank to pay ₹50,000 within 8 weeks.

What if you don’t fail... but FLY? 🕊 Dear aspirants, every time you doubt yourself, remember—your biggest "what if" might just lead to your greatest success. CLAT prep may be tough, but so are you. 💪 ✨ Swap your fear of failing with faith in flying. Every hour you study, every mock you take, every page you read—it’s all building your wings. Don’t fear the fall. Focus on the flight💪

🎬 Sitaare Zameen Par screening on our Founder’s Birthday – a day full of magic!l💫 From Jodhpur to Banaras, every LPT center lit up with joy, laughter, and heartwarming memories!🍿❤️ It wasn’t just about the movie, it was a celebration of dreams, dedication, and the incredible bond we all share. Here’s to all the shining stars of Law Prep , YOU make us glow brighter every single day! 💛

WATCH NOW!🚨 Worried about Quant in CLAT 2026? In this session, you’ll get a complete topic-wise approach along with weekly and daily targets to keep your prep on track. Learn smart tricks to easily solve charts, data interpretation, percentages, ratios, and more — even if you’re from a non-maths background. This is your roadmap to mastering QT in just 5 months! 🔗Link to watch the video : https://youtu.be/IIcBxaa3Uhk

🎬 Sitaare Zameen Par screening on our Founder’s Birthday – a day full of magic!l💫 From Jodhpur to Banaras, every LPT center lit up with joy, laughter, and heartwarming memories!🍿❤️ It wasn’t just about the movie, it was a celebration of dreams, dedication, and the incredible bond we all share. Here’s to all the shining stars of Law Prep , YOU make us glow brighter every single day! 💛

🚨WATCH NOW!🚨 Struggling with Legal Reasoning? This video gives you a complete 5-month plan to master it! 📈 From important topics to daily schedules, practice tips, and common mistakes to avoid – everything you need to boost your score is here. Perfect for CLAT 2026 aspirants aiming for top NLUs! Link to watch the video : https://youtu.be/vfzVvdqM7NU

🧑‍⚖️ Case Title: Sujoy Ghosh v. State of Jharkhand ⚖️ Summary: The Supreme Court issued notice on a plea by National Award-winning director Sujoy Ghosh seeking to quash criminal proceedings under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957, regarding allegations that his film “Kahaani 2” was based on a stolen script titled “Sabak”. The petitioner also received exemption from personal appearance before the Magistrate. 📌 Key Points: 🔹Complainant: Umesh Prasad Mehta alleged he shared his script “Sabak” with Ghosh in 2015, and that “Kahaani 2” (released 2016) copied it. 🔹Ghosh claimed his script was written in 2012 and registered in 2013, prior to any alleged meeting. 🔹The Jharkhand High Court refused to quash the complaint, leading to this SLP. 🔹Ghosh argued the Magistrate issued summons mechanically, without comparing both scripts. 🔹He also questioned the territorial jurisdiction of the Hazaribagh court, since the alleged act took place in Mumbai.