ch
Feedback
Covid Science Library

Covid Science Library

前往频道在 Telegram
5 572
订阅者
无数据24 小时
-37 天
-930 天
帖子存档
pain.xlsx0.13 KB

A member asked me about anaesthesia drugs. The nearest I could find is drugs used for pain relief. Here is my spreadsheet on those. Below I have added the spreadsheet for analgesia. Interestingly cannabidiol occurs in the list. Though it does provide pain relief it is also associated with the highest rate of fatalities in this drug list. Fatalities may be linked to misuse of the drug, where overdose is taken, since it is often used as a recreational drug. Midazolam - the "granny killer" used extensively in care homes in the UK to cut costs - is 5th rank in lethality and 3rd rank in life threatening events. That is why it is typically an "end-of-life" medication. The association of this drug with fatalities may indicate that it hastens death, or may indicate that it is given to the dying. You will have to consult clinical literature to determine if the drug itself hastens death. The intense use of Midazolam in April 2020 in care-homes and the accompanying massive peak of deaths in that month alone, suggests that it may speed demise - but I will have to check this online. The idea that it doesn't hasten death but just makes people comfortable doesn't gel with 2020 mortality data - and neither does it explain why the government in the UK was obsessed with the elderly taking it. Amlodipine controls chest pain by increasing the supply of blood to the heart. https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a692044.html. I made a typo before (now corrected) Interestingly capsaicin, found in peppers, can be used for pain relief - typically neuralgia or nerve pain. It appears to be relatively safe regarding life threatening events or fatalities. Capsaicin is often applied topically, and has the ability to switch off pain receptors - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459168/ This might help people with painful skin conditions since it has a numbing effect on pain receptors. The topically applied "Deep Heat" uses capsaicin. See https://tz.iherb.com/blog/homemade-hot-pepper-cream-for-arthritis-and-joint-pain/312 Local anaesthetics include drugs ending in "caine" such as bupivacaine. This is because these drugs are cocaine based. Dentists typically use a local anaesthesia consisting of lignocaine (anesthetic), adrenaline s(vasoconstrictor), methyl paraben (agent), sodium metabisulphate (fungicide) and water. If you are worried about possible dental use of "counter-measures" then this may help you check the ingredients. Pain may also be reduced by anti-inflammatories since pain often accompanies inflammation. Steroids can be used to reduce pain by reducing inflammation

The resulting datasets are extremely useful for analysing drug effects. This data is extracted as a subset of Eudra and includes all records where a single drug was administered to a person. This was done so that drug effects could be more clearly attributed to a single drug . I will create a separate dataset for analysis of multiple drugs upon symptom incidence, where each drug is a factor in predicted a binary symptom outcome.

Dr. William Makis: "Hundreds of Canadian children are dead after taking Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccines" 🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork 📎  Twitter  ▪️ Truth Social

"How do we know they aren't spreading a virus? We don't. " The only way we can find out is by comparing a group who were swabbed with a group who are not. This is fairly easy to do if they are swabbing everyone at an airport. Ask 100 people leaving if they have been swabbed. Then ask them for a contact number to do a follow up. If they report an illness after 1 week, then you know they were infected. Compare this to a control group who were not swabbed. If it turns out that the swabbed are being infected then this early test could expose the scheme before it goes nationwide. Please share this message and ask people who live near to an airport to carry out this activity. If everyone gets ill who has been swabbed then we will know that the swabs are loaded with pathogen. I am in Africa, so I am not able to do this activity myself. People can report their results to this telegram group.

"How do we know they aren't spreading a virus? We don't. " The only way we can find out is by comparing a group who were swabbed with a group who are not. This is fairly easy to do if they are swabbing everyone at an airport. Ask 100 people leaving if they have been swabbed. Then ask them for a contact number to do a follow up. If they report an illness after 1 week, then you know they were infected. Compare this to a control group who were not swabbed. If it turns out that the swabbed are being infected then this early test could expose the scheme before it goes nationwide.

😱😱😱😱😱🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
😱😱😱😱😱🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

It’s probably a test to see how many will comply . Like a Milgram test. You get an authority figure to assert that they must receive an illegal medical intervention. If people comply then they will know how far they can go next time . They are using the authority figure of the cdc in place of Milgram’s white coats. It’s also highly probable that the swabs are infected since they need a primary intervention that infects in order to justify further interventions The swab is known to generate false positives see https://howbad.info/createapandemic.pdf So, if they swab 1 million they will have 300,000 bird flu cases that are false positives . Then This will be used to brutally suppress and force medicate the population . It’s best not to comply with their stupid game and instead just say no. Assert your legal right. Protestors should oppose this at the airports. And tell others not to comply also. It’s curious that they are starting with the airports. When there is no virus then containment means keeping you inside . This is their first step in shutting borders. They don’t swab the immigrants but want to swab anyone with enough money to use an airplane . Shows that the virus is not real and the purpose must be to apply a medical intervention for another reason

Vaccines for Sterilization The World Health Organization has a twenty-year history of developing contraceptive vaccines. These work by creating immunity to the body’s own fertility hormone, human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). A BBC documentary entitled Horizon: The Human Laboratory, aired 5 November 1995, revealed that the WHO started using these vaccines to sterilize women in the mid-1990s. They got caught giving it to women without informed consent in the Philippines, by putting in the tetanus shots. After the recipients of the vaccine started having miscarriages, a study conducted by the Philippine Medical Association on behalf of the Philippine Department of Health revealed that almost 20% of the tetanus vaccine sampled positive for hCG. A UNICEF campaign to vaccinate Nigeria’s youth against polio may have been a front for sterilizing the nation, according to Dr. Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist. In March 2004, he reported that, using whore commended technologies like gas chromatography (GC) and radioimmunoassay, he found evidence of serious contamination. “Some of the things we discovered in the vaccines are harmful, toxic; some have direct effects on the human reproductive system,” he said. Asked why he thought manufacturers would do this, he replied: “These manufacturers, or promoters of these harmful things, have a secret agenda which only further research can reveal. Secondly, they have always taken us in the Third World for granted, thinking we don’t have the capacity, knowledge, and equipment to conduct tests that would reveal such contaminants. And, very unfortunately, they also have people to defend their atrocities within our midst, and worse still, some of these are supposed to be our own professionals who we rely on to protect our interests.

In the October 22, 1997 Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice, Dr. Classen presented more data further substantiating his findings of a vaccine-diabetes connection. He reported that the incidence of diabetes in Finland was stable in children under 4 years of age until the government made several changes in its childhood vaccination schedule. In 1974, 130,000 children age 3 months to 4 years were enrolled in a vaccine experimental trial and injected with hepatitis B vaccine or meningococcal vaccine. Then, in 1976, the pertussis vaccine used in Finland was made stronger by adding a second strain of bacteria. According to the National Vaccine Information Center’s (NVIC) report, “Juvenile Diabetes and Vaccination: New Evidence for a Connection,” during the years 1977–1979, there was a 64 percent increase in the incidence of Type-1 diabetes in Finland compared to the years 1970–1976. Doctors started reporting in the medical literature as early as 1949 that some children injected with pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine (now part of the DPT or DTaP shot) were having trouble maintaining normal glucose levels in their blood. Lab research has confirmed that pertussis vaccine can cause diabetes in mice. As diabetes research progressed in the 1960s, 70s, and 80s, there were observations that viral infections may be a co-factor in causing diabetes. The introduction of live virus vaccines, such as live MMR vaccine made from weakened forms of the live measles, mumps, and rubella viruses, has raised questions about whether live vaccine virus could be a cofactor in causing chronic diseases such as diabetes. In 1982, another vaccine was added to the childhood vaccination schedule in Finland. Children age 14 months to 6 years were given the live MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccine. This was followed by the injection of 114,000 Finnish children 3 months and older with another experimental Hib vaccine. In 1988, Finland recommended that all babies be injected with the hepatitis B vaccine. The introduction of these new vaccines in Finland was followed by a 62 percent rise in the incidence of diabetes in the 0–4 years age group and a 19 percent rise of diabetes in the 5–9 years age group between the years 1980 and 1982 and 1987 and 1989. As shown in the NVIC report, Classen concluded: The net effect was the addition of three new vaccines to the 0–4 year old age group, and a 147 percent increase in the incidence of IDDM. The addition of one new vaccine to the 5–9 year olds resulted in a 40 percent rise in diabetes incidence. With no new vaccines added to the 10 to 14 year olds, a rise in the incidence of IDDM was seen by only 8 percent between the intervals 1970–1976 and 1990–1992. The rise in IDDM in the different age groups correlated with the number of vaccines given. The Centers for Disease Control published data supporting a link between timing of immunization and the development of diabetes. The data from the CDC’s preliminary study supports published data that immunization starting after 2 months is associated with an increased risk of diabetes. The U.S. government study showed that hepatitis B immunization starting after two months was associated with an almost doubling of the risk of IDDM.

HIV does not cause AIDS.... The point that everyone is missing is that all of those original papers Gallo wrote on HIV have been found fraudulent.... The HIV hypothesis was based on those papers.Peter Duesberg. oneninetyfivenationsrising is also available on Telegram: https://t.me/oneninetyfivenationsrising Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/oneninetyfivenationsrising Whatsapp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VadypEV4Y9lvsHCSG418

cancer-drugs-compared-1.5.pdf5.67 KB

updated

cancer-drugs-compared-1.3.pdf5.70 KB

What happens when Big Pharma takes over your government, media and education system. CDC Recommended Vaccine Schedule for U.S. Children 1962: ▪️ Polio ▪️ Smallpox ▪️ DTP 1983: ▪️ DTP (2 months) ▪️ OPV (2 months) ▪️ DTP (4 months) ▪️ OPV (4 months) ▪️ DTP (6months) ▪️ MMR (15 months) ▪️ DTP (18 months) ▪️ OPV (18 months) ▪️ DTP (4 years) ▪️ OPV (4 years) ▪️ Td (15 years) 2019: ▪️ Influenza (pregnancy) ▪️ TDaP (pregnancy) ▪️ Hepatitis B (birth) ▪️ Hepatitis B (2 months) ▪️ Rotavirus (2 months) ▪️ DTaP (2 months) ▪️ HiB (2 months) ▪️ PCV (2 months) ▪️ IPV (2 months) ▪️ Rotavirus (4 months) ▪️ DTaP (4 months) ▪️ HiB (4 months) ▪️ PCV (4 months) ▪️ IPV (4 months) ▪️ Hep B (6 months) ▪️ Rotavirus (6 months) ▪️ DTaP (6 months) ▪️ HiB (6 months) ▪️ PCV (6 months) ▪️ IPV (6 months) ▪️ Influenza (6 months) ▪️ Influenza (7 months) ▪️ HiB (12 months) ▪️ PCV (12 months) ▪️ MMR (12 months) ▪️ Varicella (12 months) ▪️ Hep A (12 months) ▪️ DTaP (18 months) ▪️ Influenza (18 months) ▪️ Hep A (18 months) ▪️ Influenza (30 months) ▪️ Influenza (42 months) ▪️ DTaP (4 years) ▪️ IPV (4 years) ▪️ MMR (4 years) ▪️ Varicella (4 years) ▪️ Influenza (5 years) ▪️ Influenza (6 years) ▪️ Influenza (7 years) ▪️ Influenza (8 years) ▪️ Influenza (9 years) ▪️ HPV (9 years) ▪️ Influenza (10 years) ▪️ HPV (10 years) ▪️ TDaP (12 years) ▪️ Influenza (12 years) ▪️ Meningococcal (12 years) ▪️ Influenza (13 years) ▪️ Influenza (14 years) ▪️ Influenza (15 years) ▪️ Influenza (16 years) ▪️ Meningococcal (16 years) ▪️ Influenza (17 years) ▪️ Influenza (18 years) Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES

Dr Jessica Rose debunked the myth that the increase in adverse events reported since the rollout of COVID-19 mRNA products is due to the increasing awareness of the VAERS. Watch https://t.me/Doctorsforcovidethics/1162