Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]

This router subpoena has them panicked. Just means we are over the target. Push as hard as you can and demand the router audit!

The router story so far: Dominion allegedly ran the election in Maricopa county. [1] Maricopa county allegedly never had the admin credentials and effectively ceded the ownership of the election to an OUTSIDE VENDOR. [2] Jack Sellers, Chairman of Maricopa County Supervisors, said in a press release that the network routers used by the elections department are shared across 50 different county departments. The routers contain confidential information and info about classified law enforcement activities. He notes that WHOEVER has access to this router could potentially INTERCEPT SENSITIVE DATA. In a last ditch effort, Maricopa County Supervisors hold an emergency meeting to find a way to deflect the router subpoena. The geniuses decide they will ask George Soros’ puppet, Maricopa County Sheriff Penzone, to release a statement claiming that THE ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT ROUTER IS USED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT. In said letter, Sheriff Penzone clarifies that ANY PRIVATE VENDOR who has access to the router would be able to expose vulnerable classified data, regardless of any steps taken by said private vendor who may say otherwise. Now we have a conundrum. It’s alleged that Dominion ran the election and had control of the routers, since Maricopa county never even had the admin password to the machines. Sheriff Penzone confirmed that any outside vendor who has had access to the routers will be able to expose classified law enforcement data, regardless of what the vendor says or promises to do. Did Dominion, a private vendor allegedly with access to the elections router, have access to the law enforcement networks via the router? Did George Soros have access to the elections network via his puppet who runs the law enforcement network? What are the other 49 networks also on that router? Why do election servers need to be connected to 50 different unrelated networks? Was election data modified by other networks sharing the same router? Was HAMMER AND SCORECARD deployed in Maricopa County? DEMAND THAT ROUTER AUDIT. Sources 1. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/maricopa-county-elections-witness-testifies-dominion-ran-entire-election-county-officials-observers-never-access-passwords-video/ 2. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/breaking-maricopa-county-not-admin-access-2020-election-means-ceded-ownership-election-outside-system-provider/

The music stops for a thousand years if we don’t fix the election mess

That Soros Sheriff memo from a few days ago isnt going to age well. 🤣🤣🤣

Choose 1: The Dominion election servers were connected to other networks via a shared router with the Maricopa Police Department. or The Dominion election servers were not connected to other networks via a shared router and the routers are therefore available for immediate audit.

Routers used for elections should be LOCAL AREA NETWORK ONLY. There is no reason to have election machines connected to the internet, or other networks. Did the Soros’ Sheriff inadvertently admit that the Dominion machines were connected to other networks (and possibly the internet) via a self-admittedly shared router with the police department?

Did the Maricopa Police Department HAVE A BACKDOOR INTO THE DOMINION ELECTION SERVERS via a shared router?

Who else shared a router with the election network? Hammer and Scorecard?

According to Dr. Kelli Ward, routers used in an election can not be shared with other departments. Therefore, the Soros’ Sheriff admitting that the POLICE DEPARTMENT SHARED ROUTERS WITH THE ELECTION NETWORK is clearly a violation. source: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/gop-chair-dr-kelli-ward-maricopa-county-election-routers-shared-law-enforcement-election-not-certified-video/

“State Innovation Exchange” is listed as one of the groups who gifted Katie Hobbs money for her campaign. screenshot source: https://jewishbusinessnews.com/2015/03/25/george-soros-gives-9-2-million-to-progressive-campaign-funding-group/

“Under her own financial disclosure statement, Hobbs lists the Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs as a donor to her campaign” Campaign financing documents reveal Arizona’s Democrat Secretary of State Katie Hobbs received major funding from radical left-wing donors like George Soros and Hillary Clinton. As One America's Pearson Sharp explains, she may have even received financing from foreign governments. https://rumble.com/vg2o1h-ariz.-sec.-of-state-katie-hobbs-campaign-funded-by-left-wing-extremists-sor.html

Katie Hobbs received foreign “gifts” from at least Canada, Taiwan, and possibly Israel. Source: https://apps.azsos.gov/election/Financial_Disclosure/2017/Hobbs,%20Katie.pdf

Katie Hobbs, in summary: 1. Your email alleging Katie Hobbs has taken Taiwanese Govt money doesn’t have proof. 2. She did take Taiwanese Govt money, though. 3. But thats okay because it’s not illegal, in Az. 4. It might be illegal federally, but thats not our business.

The Quo Warranto recently filed in Arizona claims that the state elections from 2018 through 2020 were not in compliance. If the elections were not in compliance, then it supposes the elected officials were not duly elected. It asks to remove all officials who were elected in those years and hold a new vote with proper accreditation. This Quo Warranto is something to watch carefully as it plays out.

Perception is not reality.

Now I stand as a normal end-user, liberated from the inner machinations of tyrannical content moderators. The sapid irony of social and mass media is not lost on me as I observe President Trump caught in their ever-sticky tentacles fighting the cancel culture hydra head-on. There were many chances in the first four years of his elected term to address the issue of out-of-control content moderation, however, be it through hubris, policy ineffectivity, or just plain underestimation, cancel culture has festered and boiled over to become the most underestimated political monster of our generation.