Path of Totality

Adolf Hitler Solves the Problem of Ancient Tribal Rivalries in Modern Germany (2 of 10) “Let us begin on the right, with the conservatives, who nowadays call themselves German Nationalists. In large sections of the country they are the intruders, the immigrants, the colonizers, the conquerors, wishing unconditionally to preserve their ruling relationship to the indigenous population. The farther we move into the eastern part of Germany, the more strongly does this claim to domination become evident. Without a doubt, these people’s ancestors were once pioneers of the German character and bearers of a higher and superior Western culture. Owners of landed estates and large farms, the aristocracy, tradition-bound officialdom, and the representatives of the Protestant Church support this party. In the economic sector, it draws on those who are in a position to derive their capital assets from old landed property.”

Adolf Hitler Solves the Problem of Ancient Tribal Rivalries in Modern Germany (1 of 10) “Wherever intermixtures occurred during the times of the migrations of nations [during] the Roman Empire, and the medieval struggles for power and national wars, we see today that the political party conflicts express the deepest roots of the old dispute. It is not primarily democratic, political, or economic opinions that confront each other in the framework of German party argument; rather the primal feud of these strata — today called class hatred — has risen anew!”

San Francisco Blues (3 of 3) Once she’s recovered from the initial shock of her ordeal, she goes right back to her anti-White ways. She’s lying! There’s no way in hell it was a “well-groomed, and well-dressed White man” that did to her what she claims. In her case, and in many such cases… Idealogical Demoralization: Complete #DiversityDisorder

San Francisco Blues (2 of 3) #DiversityDisorder

San Francisco Blues (1 of 3) #DiversityDisorder

Adolf Hitler on the French Revolution “At the end of the eightteenth century, when the French Revolution began to liberate the indigenous population from the rule of the aristocracy, and democracy proclaimed and legalized the equal rights of both groups, what happened was not that from that day forth the tensions were removed and both sections shook hands; rather, the reverse took place: it became possible to express mutual animosities, the democratic right to do so now existed. No wonder that, from then on, the groups formed separate parties, which attacked each other. They believed they were acting from political conviction, but in reality, they had dug up the old war hatchet that had seemed buried for centuries.” — the words of Adolf Hitler according to the testimony of Otto Wagener [Hitler: Memoirs of a Confidant (1946) by Otto Wagener, Yale University Press Edition, 1985, translated by Ruth Hein, edited by Henry Ashby, Jr., p. 209]

“That Demon Uprising was not real!” #FridayFunPosting

#FridayFunPosting

Great Vision of Greatness (1933) by Richard Spritz

Any moment might be our last. Everything is more beautiful because we're doomed. You will never be lovelier than you are now. We will never be here again. — from The Iliad by Homer

Planet Caravan (1970) by Black Sabbath

Straight from the Horse’s Mouth @WithJoosYouLose @Facts_Are_Antisemitic_911

#ScienceSaturday No. 62 #IncredibleHeights The Great Jump of Felix Baumgartner https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Baumgartner

The Prince of Peace (5 of 5) As Chamberlain obviously can claim his share of the peace making, he could possibly have a smaller part of the Peace Prize. But the most correct thing to do is not to put another name beside the name of Adolf Hitler and thereby throwing a shadow on him. Adolf Hitler is by all means the authentic God-given fighter for peace, and millions of people all over the world put their hopes in him as the Prince of Peace on earth. — Erik Gottfried Christian Brandt Stockholm, January 27, 1939

The Prince of Peace (4 of 5) Sadly there still are a great number of people who fail to see the greatness in Adolf Hitler´s struggle for peace. Based on this fact I would not have found the time right to nominate Hitler as a candidate to the Nobel Peace Prize had it not been for a number of Swedish parliamentarians who have nominated another candidate, namely the British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. This nomination seems to be poorly thought. Although it is true that Chamberlain through his generous understanding of Hitler´s struggle for pacification has contributed to the saving of world peace, the last decision was Hitlers and not Chamberlains! Hitler and no one else is first and foremost to be thanked for the peace which still prevails in the greater part of Europe; and this man is also the hope for peace in the future.

The Prince of Peace (3 of 5) By his glowing love for peace, earlier documented in his famous book Mein Kampf – next to the Bible perhaps the best and most popular piece of literature in the world - together with his peaceful achievement — the annexation of Austria — Adolf Hitler has avoided the use of force by freeing his countrymen in Sudetenland and making his fatherland big and powerful. Probably Hitler will, if unmolested and left in peace by war mongers, pacify Europe and possibly the whole world.

The Prince of Peace (2 of 5) To the Norwegian Nobel Committee I hereby humbly suggest that the Peace Prize for 1939 is awarded the German Chancellor and Führer Adolf Hitler, a man, who in the opinion of millions of people, is a man who more than anyone in the world has deserved this highly respected reward. Authentic documents reveal that in September 1938 world peace was in great danger; it was only a matter of hours before a new European war could break out. The man who during this dangerous time saved our part of the world from this terrible catastrophe was without no doubt the great leader of the German people. In the critical moment he voluntarily did not let weapons speak although he had the power to start a world war.

The Prince of Peace (1 of 5) In a submission not intended to be taken seriously, Social Democrat and antifascist member of the Swedish parliament Gottfrid Christian Brandt nominated German Führer Adolf Hitler for the Nobel Peace Prize. Brandt never intended for it to be a serious proposal, and instead saw it only as a "satiric criticism" on another concurrent nomination, namely that of Neville Chamberlain (for the Munich Agreement). If Neville Chamberlain was nominated, then why not the other half of the agreement — Adolf Hitler? I believe he also had the ulterior motive of mocking Adolf Hitler. However, from the following passage we will see that although Brandt’s satire may have been a success concerning Neville Chamberlain, his sarcasm towards Der Führer was an abysmal failure(!), for he inadvertently tells the situation as it really was, and describes Adolf Hitler as he literally was — the prince of peace.