NaturalLaw

Finally, the show is over. Starting on July 11th, we’re releasing 100+ hours of content, covering every aspect of the “pandemic.” A big show. One that's been on-air since TVs were in black and white. With The End of COVID, we’ve created a library of videos to educate the public on what’s happened over the last three years. Plus, the decades before it ... we go all the way back to the origins of germ theory, and touch on every so-called “pandemic” up to the present ... exposes pandemics for what they really are. "For you and those you care about, we've all been touched by the lies." https://tinyurl.com/4ewsf6tw

https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/23588825.hyndburn-council-tax-court-cases-shock-borough-tops-table/ Stop paying council tax and reclaim. There is no obligation to make payment and it is already settled. There is no legal process that can issue or enforce liability orders. See below and in files to learn the why and how to.

Cremo’s highly controversial book ‘Forbidden Archaeology’ discusses numerous examples of enigmatic ancient artifacts, such as those mentioned in chapter 2, all of which have been ignored and all of which prove beyond any shadow of doubt that the antiquity of modern man far exceeds the timeframe that is presented to us in orthodox chronologies. Cremo’s book was extremely well research and presented some very substantial arguments and so, in 1996, the NBC used some material from the book to feature in an excellent TV special entitled ‘The Mysterious Origins of Man’ However, when the NBC aired the presentation, the reaction from the Academic Community was like a shockwave. In a seething mass of abuse, the NBC was literally inundated with letters and calls from irate members of various faculties accusing the network of ‘deception’ and calling the producer a ‘fraud’. Still others called the whole program a ‘hoax’ and a ‘sham,’ and claiming the airing of it was a ‘lie the public!’ But because the evidence displayed on the program was so damaging to the deception that Academia is intent on perpetuating, merely complaining was not all they did. They actually attempted to force the NBC not to run the program a second time. The NBC simply ignored them and aired it again anyway and so a group of scientists then took the most radical step imaginable: In their fear and desperation that people may actually believe the findings reported in the TV Special, they gathered their trusty Doctorates together and presented their case to the Federal Government, formally requesting that the Federal Communications Commission step in and ban the NBC from ever airing the program again! And you don’t have to just believe me; this is all very well documented. A letter that was written to the FCC during the affair by a Dr Allison Palmer who is the President of the Institute for Cambrian Studies is also quite revealing: “At the very least, NBC should be required to make substantial prime-time apologies to their viewing audience for a sufficient period of time so that the audience clearly gets the message that they were duped. In addition, NBC should perhaps be fined sufficiently so that a major fund for public science education can be established.” Public Science education? What on earth is that supposed to mean? …Freudian slip maybe? something to ponder https://youtu.be/u__Zm4stnug

THESE ARE ACTUAL COMPLAINTS RECEIVED BY "THOMAS COOK VACATIONS" FROM DISSATISFIED ENGLISH CUSTOMERS: 1. "They should not allow topless sunbathing on the beach. It was very distracting for my husband who just wanted to relax." 2. "On my holiday to Goa in India, I was disgusted to find that almost every restaurant served curry. I don't like spicy food." 3. "We went on holiday to Spain and had a problem with the taxi drivers as they were all Spanish." 4. "We booked an excursion to a water park but no-one told us we had to bring our own swimsuits and towels. We assumed it would be included in the price." 5. "The beach was too sandy. We had to clean everything when we returned to our room." 6. "We found the sand was not like the sand in the brochure. Your brochure shows the sand as white but it was more yellow." 7. "It's lazy of the local shopkeepers in Puerto Vallartato close in the afternoons. I often needed to buy things during 'siesta' time -- this should be banned." 8. "No-one told us there would be fish in the water. The children were scared." 9. "Although the brochure said that there was a fully equipped kitchen, there was no egg-slicer in the drawers." 10. "I think it should be explained in the brochure that the local convenience store does not sell proper biscuits like custard creams or ginger nuts." 11. "The roads were uneven and bumpy, so we could not read the local guide book during the bus ride to the resort. Because of this, we were unaware of many things that would have made our holiday more fun." 12. "It took us nine hours to fly home from Jamaica to England. It took the Americans only three hours to get home. This seems unfair." 13. "I compared the size of our one-bedroom suite to our friends' three-bedroom and ours was significantly smaller." 14. "The brochure stated: 'No hairdressers at the resort.' We're trainee hairdressers and we think they knew and made us wait longer for service." 15. "When we were in Spain, there were too many Spanish people there. The receptionist spoke Spanish, the food was Spanish. No one told us that there would be so many foreigners." 16. "We had to line up outside to catch the boat and there was no air-conditioning." 17. "It is your duty as a tour operator to advise us of noisy or unruly guests before we travel." 18. "I was bitten by a mosquito. The brochure did not mention mosquitoes." 19. "My fiancée and I requested twin-beds when we booked, but instead we were placed in a room with a king bed. We now hold you responsible and want to be re-reimbursed for the fact that I became pregnant. This would not have happened if you had put us in the room that we booked."

https://youtu.be/L5is16A8pfw 9 years ago

Council Tax Many are realising that some institutions including councils are getting away with financial pillaging. Council tax is no exception, and there is no lawful requirement to make payment for this. It is a common belief that council tax goes towards paying for services provided by the council, the police and local amenities etc... All a cloak with much deception and fear to add to the illusion. What you are not told, the council are utilising LOBO loans: https://issuu.com/debtresistanceuk/docs/16.02.09_lada_booklet_revised_final It is presumed that you have to pay CT for the benefit of the community, this is the presumed contract, where in fact there is no valuable consideration or exchange. You make your payment and it goes to pay off their LOBO loan. Furthermore, the banks create the money, from nothing for these LOBO loans.

For all who have doubts and concerns over the Covid pandemic, for all those loved ones who are concerned and feel deceived or vulnerable, for those that aren't sure what to believe and for all those that still believe. This is our chance to know the facts and allow others to understand what has been going on, The End of Covid is here lets tell them about it. So much information and leading experts, beginning June 20. All content is free to access during the 21 days. https://tinyurl.com/2wvtxvjt

Equitable results: These include a court not being able to evidence a liability order (LO) and delivering a bogus warrant! The DCA (Marston) was acting as arrest enforcement agents. All have ceased since the LO was not adduced. Follow up, DSARs to all parties, if DCA cannot adduce valid warrants at times when “arrest notices” were hand delivered then there is a fraud, S.2 Fraud Act 2006, a serious crime, the possibility of 10 years committal plus claims for compensation. Direct Debit Reclaim, via Nationwide 2021, they did honour the DD Guarantee, not sure what banks currently do as many have jumped on this. There ought to be claims from this as the DCAs start their process. Parkingeye and Equita, after DSAR they dropped all outstanding matters. Claim for compensation was thought about, but as they dropped matters that were years ago and in the spirit of equity have let them go. Council, Penalty Charge Notice for bus lane, they ignored questioning and proceeded with Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) and DCA (Bristow & Sutor). All three were sent DSARs and all three failed to comply, claims for compensation are to be sent in due course. The failure of compliance to DSAR is evidence they have to chose in action. B&S did clamp car, called the DCA and told him he’s one hour to remove it. As it turned out couldn’t be bothered to wait so removed the clamp, took a photo of it, and sent the CEO an email advising him to collect it, heard nothing more. Council, PCN for parking in 2018, TEC and DCA (Newlyn) involved, working with affidavits at the time. DCA clamped car, agent was told to remove the clamp or be served affidavit personally, you have one hour. He came back and removed it. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1215509255752939

The way I see it that there is law of nature, created by god, grantor of dominion over earth, there is no agreement needed it just works. The link https://tinyurl.com/4pvts5nu will show how one can come forth as one of mankind, above man made law. We then have common law, a settled law created by man, agreements between man over rights to land. Then equity, which is all the court hear these days (since 1925) and is divided into legal and beneficial sides. We should be on the beneficial side but are tricked and coerced to the legal side, this is where PK are and this is why they struggle. So to know how to behave as beneficiary means that we are not subject to the legal side of the trust and can settle financial matters using Bills of Exchange and deal with DCAs as they have no chose in action. Equitable Remedy, some good info here https://www.facebook.com/groups/1215509255752939 It's all about property and who has rights to it...the highest claim. The Chancery is where trusts are heard and the LoP 1925 sets out rules of conveyance for property. The administrative court is just that...administrating property of those that do not comprehend the legislation. They are construed as trustee because they don't know they should be the beneficiary.

You have what is true inside you Discover how to express and uphold your own law for your own life 90 Minute Q&A Clinic Reveals The Practical Lawful Pathway To Build The Life You’ve Always Dreamed Of, Without Being Coerced, Controlled Or Overpowered By Anyone Ever Again It is always only your choice https://tinyurl.com/4pvts5nu

An event is taking place next month that will likely end up being the largest of it’s kind ever ran in the alternative community The event is called The End of Covid 88 lectures, delivered via 11 modules, over 21 days, beginning June 20. All content is free to access during the 21 days (paid for lifetime access) https://tinyurl.com/2wvtxvjt

it really is this simple https://youtu.be/5yEFsayQib4

an interesting read, the real time page strangely no longer exists https://web.archive.org/web/20220214060142/https://www.truthcontrol.com/articles/treaty-1213-beginning-lie

p 20 of the order of service sets out the relationship between the people and those governing.... https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/king-charles-coronation-order-service-full-2023-j2bnfxxmk All remain standing. Samuel Strachan, Child of His Majesty’s Chapel Royal, addresses The King YOUR Majesty, as children of the kingdom of God we welcome you in the name of the King of kings. The King replies In his name and after his example I come not to be served but to serve. SUBSTANCE = We are all children of creation = our birth right as expressed in the Act of Settlement 1700, and in the Bill of Rights 1688 as 'auntient rights and liberties' Those governing are there to serve us = not tell us what to do = People are sovereign over those governing including Parliament who direct governance on our behalf to uphold our birth right and they have NO AUTHORITY TO CAUSE USE HARM!!! as expressed in the Bill of Rights 1688 - PARLIAMENT CANNOT CREATE LAW... in ARTICLE 13 which expresses the authority of Parliament: Frequent Parliaments. And that for Redresse of all Grievances and for the amending strengthening and preserveing of the Lawes Parlyaments ought to be held frequently. AMMEND MEANS CHANGE EXISTING - THAT IS NOT AUTHORITY TO CREATE LAW!!! and it is expressly to STRENGTHEN AND PRESERVE the laws and we create the law in the independent judiciary which is created by the second promise: The Archbishop says Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements? The King replies I will. And the Lord Chancellor promises to ensure the independance of the judiciary And the Justices of the Peace and Magistrates promise to do so according to law!!! SO NO ONE OTHER THAN THE PEOPLE CREATE THE LAW - TIME TO EDUCATE AND HOLD THOSE SERVING THE PUBLIC TO ACCOUNT :)

Laura Nina Is this the oath he has to take today? He hasn't said or done it yet? This is from the order of ceremonies :) and you will have the action expressed some time after 11am :) UK Brian Reece And this ladies and gentlemen means no more bollox of, old and archaic. It will be unarguably current! Now they have a real BIG problem in 🤡🌍 EXACTLY - and that shoots down that line of BS even in the Magistrates Court :) After today we modify the notices and covering letters accordingly... Even BBB is going to have to change his tune! You Then, for the first time at a Coronation, The King prays publicly for grace to be ‘a blessing to all … of every faith and belief’ and to serve after the pattern of Christ NO OTHER CHANGES TO THE RALTIONSHIP WHEN CHARLES III GET CORONATED... The King places his hand on the Bible, and the Archbishop administers the Oath WILL you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, your other Realms and the Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs? The King replies I solemnly promise so to do. The Archbishop says Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements? The King replies I will. The King kneels at the Chair of Estate. The Archbishop says WILL you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them? The King replies All this I promise to do. The King places his hand on the Bible and says The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God.. The King kisses the Bible. The Archbishop says YOUR Majesty, are you willing to make, subscribe, and declare to the statutory Accession Declaration Oath? . The King replies I am willing. I CHARLES do solemnly and sincerely in the presence of God profess, testify, and declare that I am a faithful Protestant, and that I will, according to the true intent of the enactments which secure the Protestant succession to the Throne, uphold and maintain the said enactments to the best of my powers according to law. The King signs copies of the Oaths, presented by the Lord Chamberlain, whilst the choir sings So this is the oath, word by word, that he is taking today? Can I share this?

what has it come to! the peoples constables/peace keepers running around after someone the people never elected! and being paid to be mercenaries against the people that pay their wages! pretty fucked up one might conclude.