Stephen Wells
前往频道在 Telegram
显示更多
未指定国家未指定类别
345
订阅者
+124 小时
+357 天
+3730 天
帖子存档
Repost from Noticer News
A US biotech firm is planning to inject cattle in New Zealand with a methane-reducing mRNA vaccine by 2028.
The vaccine is funded by the government and a clean energy organisation founded by Bill Gates as part of efforts to combat "climate change".
https://www.noticer.news/new-zealand-cattle-arkeabio-methane-vaccine/
Follow: @NoticerNews
This "vaccine" will absolutely fail to do anything to reduce the methane that cows produce and obviously methane has ZERO abilty to change the climate (Saturn's moon of Titan has 2,000 times the concentration of methane in its atmosphere than Earth and has zero "greenhouse" warming). What it will do is pollute the meat and maybe cause disease and death of cattle.
Any politician that allows this should face the death penalty, as should Bill Gates and everyone in his foundation that is part of this.
Repost from Jack Eltis
Everyone knows Chris Minns bends over backwards for the Jewish ethnic lobbies and also Israeli lobbies (such as ECAJ and the NSW JBD).
He was the very first attendee of the Rambam Junket to Israel.
He has passed nation leading unconstitutional “antisemitism” and “hate speech” laws, in collaboration with Jewish lobby groups, and as a result of their lobbying.
Just a handful of examples are the “Nazi conduct” law, the 93ZAA laws that jailed Brandan Koschel, the other tract of laws that banned protesting near Synagogues, and later the entire suburb of Bondi.
His NSW Police go overseas to train in Israel and have been spotted wearing pro-Israel pins, the list goes on and on.
Minns is upset that people have noticed his very actions!
https://t.me/ausvstheagenda/4027
Repost from Australians vs. The Agenda
NSW Premier Chris Minns would like everyone to stop sharing the image that depicts him as an Israeli Mossad agent wearing Israeli military uniform and surrounded by surveillance cameras and drones.
Minns insists he has no ties to the Israeli government.
Repost from Jack Eltis
Ultimately the banning has only legitimised the broader movement with the public.
The ban has made Australians come out in even greater support.
Everywhere we go, people exclaim how they’re behind us and that we have to win the case.
I got spotted in traffic the other day by a patriot who was just yelling saying “all the boys at work are all following on, we’re watching everything, we’re all fully behind you, YOU GOTTA WIN THE CASE”.
Australians love supporting an underdog just on principle, and believe in the idea that everyone should get a “fair go” and that ideas should be decided at the ballot box.
All this legislating by the government is completely at odds, and out of touch with Australian culture and fundamental Australian values.
As a radicaliser of the public it’s been a huge net win.
Repost from Noticer News
One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce has backed calls from the far-left Greens to block the livestreamed US execution of a Muslim terrorist in Australia, saying he doesn't want "anyone" seeing it.
https://www.noticer.news/one-nation-greens-block-execution-livestream/
Follow: @NoticerNews
Perhaps they shouldnt have banned the WAP, then we would not be forced to only associate with weak and bland civ nat politicians.
Repost from The XYZ
THE 18.6 YEAR LUNAR CYCLE BEHIND THE IMMINENT REAL ESTATE CRASH
“It’s the moon, stupid. And the downturn phase of the lunar nodal cycle for real estate began in mid-2026, inaugurating what we can expect will be a brutal next four years.”
https://xyz.net.au/2026/10/the-18-6-year-lunar-cycle-behind-the-imminent-real-estate-crash/
The only real problem with the above publicised execution is that it has taken 17 years to carry it out! It should have bene done within 24 hours of the sentence.
Repost from Noticer News
Woke Pope Leo XIV has been blasted over a post condemning the death penalty days after the US announced it would livestream the firing squad execution of a Muslim mass shooter.
https://www.noticer.news/pope-leo-condemns-death-penalty/
Follow: @NoticerNews
A timely word from the current Pope that supports my assessment of him in the above article that he "may as well be the Antichrist for all of the heresies and blasphemies he is preaching".
The Protestant Reformation couldnt have succeeded if there were no real problems with how the Church was conducting itself at the time. The fact that such revolutions have led to worse problems doesnt change this.
I choose to promote National Socialism not because it has no potential for corruption, but simply because I find more Godliness in its practioners, past and present, than I find in any other area of society in the past 150 years. It may not be Christian in name, but I find more (real) Christian ethics in it's political doctrines than any other political system that can currently be pursued in real life. Because I cannot restore a monarchy without first having a worthy monarch to propose. Thomas Sewell for king? Im happy with him as political leader for now!
Also its not enough to simply sit on the sidelines and bemoan how bad things are. We are commanded to oppose evil with whatever tools we have available to us. I have National Socialism. Some people in the UK have Restore Britain. Ultimately God will decide which tool HE will use to bring things back in line. But He will bless those who act, not those who just criticise.
Adam Piggot says Rupert Lowe will fail at restoring the UK, that National Socialism will fail here in Australia. Yet he provides no path or suggestions as to how his preferred order could be established as an alternative. I challenge him to remedy that and then act on it so that those who are persuaded by his argument can follow his example.
In the meantime, let me suggest to Adam how a real Christian order will actually be established again, rather than just wistfully reminissed over:
People of action will stand up against evil and oppose it, using whatever tools are available to them. They will struggle using democracy, activist groups, preaching in a few churches, community groups, etc, etc. Occasionally spontaneous mobs will errupt into violence as the current system pushes harder and harder to repress dissent. These people will be Christian and non Christian but unlikely to be listening to the advice of their local priest or pastor on political matters.
One way or another the current system will eventually fall to people who value truth and hate evil. They will not be perfect, they will not be united in religious belief. What system replaces it and how long it lasts for is a separate issue.
The original Christian Church ran a parrallel community for 300 years before Constantine. Often in secret. Whatever the flaws of the original Reformation there should be no doubt that Christianity is desparately in need of one today. We have scripture. We have the writings of the early Church fathers. We have still a few Godly ordained Priests and Pastors. A new parrallel community must be built out of the ashes of the burned out husks of present Church denominations.
The road back to God will also be a parrallel and separate one to the road to reclaiming our Countries. White Christian men have a duty to travel on both. The Christian path is one of zero compromise and personal example in the private sphere. The road to reclaiming our countries is one of changing plans and strategies in response to enemy opposition in persuit of clearly defined goals in the public sphere.
We are so far removed from Catholic monarchy today that it is fantasy to say we must restore it before we can have our civilisation back. Our civilisation existed long before Catholic monarchy. So if you want Catholic monarchy back, we must first restore our civilisation.
I have read with both bewilderment and curiosity Adam Piggot's last few articles in the XYZ recently, where he calls for a return to Catholic monachy and feudal order.
My issues are not so much with what he is proposing but rather the complete absense of explanation or proposal of how such an order should be reestablished.
Who should be King? Who should be Lords? Who should the Catholic Bishops and Pope be? How should they be chosen and elevated? How should this system be restored?
I have no issue with the observation that our current woes can be traced back to the Reformation, Enlightenment and splitting of the Church just over 500 years ago. That subsequent events such as the French revolution and the two world wars moved us further and further away from collective responsibilty and unity under Christ towards individualism and materialism and globalism. This does not help though when it comes to deciding what to do about it.
The Catholic Church is in no better state today than the hundreds of splintered Protestant ones. The current Pope may as well be the Antichrist for all of the heresies and blasphemies he is preaching. The Cardinals are no better, nor have I experienced much reason for hope in the local Catholic churches Ive attended. Maybe Adam Piggot's local church is a pargon of former righteousness and glory but that doesnt help the rest of us.
I have found no hope in the Orthodox church either. The same woke virus that has infected the west since the end of the 2nd world war has infected all christian demominations to one degree or another.
As for Christian kings and nobles, again, who? From where? How?
If we look at the English feudal system before Henry VIII made himself head of the English church; it was established by Norman conquest and those Norman nobles had secured their positions via ancestors who 150 years before the battle of Hastings had raped and pillaged as Viking invaders and only agreed to become Christian in exchange for permanent ownership of land in France. They replaced the Saxon Witan with Norman Barons and historical consensus is that life became less pleasant for the average peasant as a result for a few hundred years. Mainly because the Anglo Saxons were an occupied people and they were ruled by a different group. Until everyone saw themselves as English, not Normans or Saxons anymore, tyranny reigned.
Even if we look at the rest of Catholic dark ages Europe the line of kings and nobles are converted to Christianity after coming to power, they didnt come to power by embracing Christ first. In other words, the feudal system wasnt unique to Christianity, it was simply how all civilisations organised in ancient times. Christianity simply brought that system under the inflence of the Church. In fact Kings were not the original government structure of God's people. For 500 years after Moses Isreal had no King but only judges to adjudicate disputes. In 1 Samuel 8:7 God regards the Isrealite's demands for a King to be appointed as a rebellion:
"Listen to the voice of the people regarding all that they say to you, because they have not rejected you, but they have rejected Me from being King over them."
Kings and nobles are just names for positions that naturally exist in all civilisations. Before Saul was appointed as the 1st King of Isreal, there was still leaders and hierachy. A King is just another form of leader. A president or prime minister is just another form of king. What title we give to them or how we choose them is neither here nor there. There are bad kings and bad popes and bad presidents and bad judges and bad prime ministers, etc, etc.
The feudal era was not some golden age free from sin, ungodliness and tyranny. It had its own flaws. Ungodly kings and corrupt priests became widespread and systemic. The Catholic fuedal system didnt just fall because of outside pressures. People didnt turn away from God for no reason. The French revolution couldnt have succeeded if there was no truth in accusations levelled against the Aristocracy.
Repost from The XYZ
RESTORE BRITAIN WILL BE MORE OF THE SAME
“What the imposter elites most fear is a return of real faith. All of their work over hundreds of years has been specifically designed to destroy that faith.”
https://xyz.net.au/2026/10/restore-britain-will-be-more-of-the-same/
