Edom is Idumea
前往频道在 Telegram
Edom is the Herodian Idumeans from Mount Seir, the descendants of Esau. Advocate for land distribution by genetic ties. Israelites/Persia/Europe, Edom/Babylonia/Africa. The emnity is based on grudges, honesty avoids war. Parody Account only.
显示更多未指定国家未指定类别
330
订阅者
+124 小时
+47 天
+830 天
帖子存档
+2
Identifying some of the human species who lived in the Ancient Levant
1) Homo Nesher Ramla
2) Hamadryas
3) Homo Sapiens
This is likely just a few of the species mentioned in Genesis. According to Harry McAque, this is easily provable via blood types.
Version 2
@edomisidumea
Responding to "why would socialists want to Islamize Europe though?"
Because socialists often reach for Marx who insists on violent revolution. Some socialists believe it's needed to overthrow an unjust system. In reality Marxism ends in financial disaster by destroying the middle class as we are seeing, meaning they resort to private capital.
This is unlike libertarianism before it was hijacked from anti-plutocracy to anti-nationalism, which emphasized decentralized wealth as a way of avoiding monopoly. I'd argue libertarianism in its original form is a better option as it focuses on debanking the plutocrats instead of violent revolution.
The shills will then try and deflect blame to the east, and what this misses is that Rittenberg, Cohen, Shapiro, and others held a gun to his head, no doubt. The idea that revolution against the public is a better idea than against the banks is pure retardation in my opinion, I'm not sure why anyone wouldn't focus on the banks instead. And as I said decentralized wealth was a key tenet of anti-plutocratic early libertarianism, by far the correct option and it's not even close.
I don't buy violent, undemocratic, revolution against innocent people being anything except Edomite (owned by Canaanites).
Responding to "why would socialists want to Islamize Europe though?"
Because socialists often reach for Marx who insists on violent revolution. Some socialists believe it's needed to overthrow an unjust system. In reality Marxism ends in financial disaster by destroying the middle class as we are seeing, meaning they resort to private capital.
This is unlike libertarianism before it was hijacked from anti-plutocracy to anti-nationalism, which believed more in decentralized wealth as a way of avoiding monopoly. I'd argue libertarianism in its original form is a better option as it focuses on debanking the plutocrats instead of violent revolution.
The shills will then try and deflect blame to the east, and what this misses is that Rittenberg, Cohen, Shapiro, and others held a gun to his head, no doubt. The idea that revolution against the public is a better idea than against the banks is pure retardation in my opinion, I'm not sure why anyone wouldn't focus on the banks instead. And as I said decentralized wealth was a key tenet of anti-plutocratic early libertarianism, by far the correct option and it's not even close.
I don't buy violent, undemocratic, revolution against innocent people being anything except Edomite (owned by Canaanites).
Responding to "why would Socialists want to Islamize Europe though?"
Because socialists often reach for Marx who insists on violent revolution. Some socialists believe it's needed to overthrow an unjust system. In reality Marxism ends in financial disaster by destroying the middle class as we are seeing, meaning they resort to private capital.
This is unlike libertarianism before it was hijacked from anti-plutocracy to anti-nationalism, which believed more in decentralized wealth as a way of avoiding monopoly. I'd argue libertarianism in its original form is a better option as it focuses on debanking the plutocrats instead of violent revolution.
The shills will then try and deflect blame to the east, and what this misses is that Rittenberg, Cohen, Shapiro, and others held a gun to his head, no doubt. The idea that Revolution against the public is a better idea than against the banks is pure retardation in my opinion, I'm not sure why anyone wouldn't focus on the banks instead. And as I said decentralized wealth was a key tenet of anti-plutocratic early libertarianism, by far the correct option and it's not even close.
I don't buy violent, undemocratic, revolution against innocent people being anything except Edomite (owned by Canaanites).
Respinding to "why would Socialists want to Islamize Europe though?"
Because socialists often reach for Marx who insists on violent revolution. Some socialists believe it's needed to overthrow an unjust system. In reality Marxism ends in financial disaster by destroying the middle class as we are seeing, meaning they resort to private capital.
This is unlike libertarianism before it was hijacked from anti-plutocracy to anti-nationalism, which believed more in decentralized wealth as a way of avoiding monopoly. I'd argue libertarianism in its original form is a better option as it focuses on debanking the plutocrats instead of violent revolution.
The shills will then try and deflect blame to the east, and what this misses is that Rittenberg, Cohen, Shapiro, and others held a gun to his head, no doubt.
The idea that Revolution against the public is a better idea than against the banks is pure retardation in my opinion, I'm not sure why anyone wouldn't focus on the banks instead. And as I said decentralized wealth was a key tenet of anti-plutocratic early libertarianism, by far the correct option and it's not even close.
I don't buy violent, undemocratic, revolution against innocent people being anything except Edomite (owned by Canaanites).
G2b-M377 (Y-DNA) - Genealogy Overview & Edomite Hypothesis
There might be one or two spelling mistakes here, but the data is still up on 23andme and familytreedna:
https://discover.23andme.com/haplogroup/g2b1-paternal
Pages 19 and 20:
https://www.familytreedna.com/public/G2c/default.aspx?section=ysnp
G2b-M377 aka G-M377 also includes Roth, Herzl, Fink, Schwab/Soros (both Schwartz), Lehman and many others.
G2b-M377 is concentrated in Jordan (Edom) and explains why the term Yid comes from Yiddemu and Yidumea (Idumea aka Edom). Kenaz was Esau's grandson in Genesis chapter 36.
Full lineage: G-M201 > G2-P287 > G2b-M3115 > G-M377/L72/L183 > G-M283. G-M283 is the Karlani Afghan Edomite lineage.
This is not conclusive for example Lehman is also G2b-M377 (confirmed on a Facebook post) and I'm sure there are many others, such as Zuck/Zucker for example that I've missed which I heard is also G2b-M377.
@edomisidumea
+1
This is essentially proof that Freemasonry was used as a sorcery (mind control) system by Edomites to both destroy the Tartary Empire and Europe itself
+1
They'll never admit we were forced into a war against our ethnic cousins.
You need to be around under 60 max give or take to acknowledge it.
It's either this or he has a gun to his head, or it's a clone.
+1
This is essentially proof that Freemasonry was used as a sorcery (mind control) system by Edomites to both destroy the Tarary Empire and Europe itself
And Vox is still Edomite like The Economist, Politics Joe, Red Diffusion, and countless others
+3
In the passover festival they drink to the damnation of the nations and pray for the destruction of Christianity
This is because Judaism was formalized 300 years after Jesus by Geonim (Kohanim/Canaanites) in Neo-Babylon after they captured the real Israelites with Edom, then pointed at Rome to hide their collab.
+1
There's definitely something other than the sacred Baboon involved. I heard it's Tay Sachs or VMAT2 deficiency. Why we don't drop everything and heal this instead I have zero idea.
现已上线!2025 年 Telegram 研究 — 年度关键洞察 
