NeuralZone | AI Apps
@NeuralZone – Curated, hand-picked AI tools and services that are actually useful. Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/NeuralZone contact us via @photofixer
إظهار المزيد📈 نظرة تحليلية على قناة تيليجرام NeuralZone | AI Apps
تُعد قناة NeuralZone | AI Apps (@neuralzone) في القطاع اللغوي الإنكليزية لاعباً نشطاً. يضم المجتمع حالياً 402 276 مشتركاً، محتلاً المرتبة 214 في فئة التكنولوجيات والتطبيقات والمرتبة 251 في منطقة دولي.
📊 مؤشرات الجمهور والحراك
منذ تأسيسه في невідомо، حقق المشروع نمواً سريعاً وجمع 402 276 مشتركاً.
بحسب آخر البيانات بتاريخ 13 يوليو, 2026، تحافظ القناة على نشاط مستقر. خلال آخر 30 يوماً تغيّر عدد الأعضاء بمقدار -9 610، وفي آخر 24 ساعة بمقدار -321، مع بقاء الوصول العام مرتفعاً.
- حالة التحقق: غير موثّقة
- معدل التفاعل (ER): يبلغ متوسط تفاعل الجمهور 6.13%. وخلال أول 24 ساعة من النشر يحصد المحتوى عادةً 1.67% من ردود الفعل نسبةً إلى إجمالي المشتركين.
- وصول المنشورات: يحصل كل منشور على متوسط 24 687 مشاهدة. وخلال اليوم الأول يجمع عادةً 6 712 مشاهدة.
- التفاعلات والاستجابة: يتفاعل الجمهور بانتظام؛ متوسط التفاعلات لكل منشور يبلغ 22.
- الاهتمامات الموضوعية: يركز المحتوى على مواضيع رئيسية مثل defi, neuralzone, oddin.ai, edwin, ido.
📝 الوصف وسياسة المحتوى
يصف المؤلف القناة بأنها مساحة للتعبير عن الآراء الذاتية:
“@NeuralZone – Curated, hand-picked AI tools and services that are actually useful.
Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/NeuralZone
contact us via @photofixer”
بفضل وتيرة التحديث المرتفعة (أحدث البيانات بتاريخ 14 يوليو, 2026) تحافظ القناة على حداثتها ومستوى وصول مرتفع. وتُظهر التحليلات تفاعلاً نشطاً من الجمهور، ما يجعلها نقطة تأثير مهمة ضمن فئة التكنولوجيات والتطبيقات.
"Take the IQ test on iq-test.cc. When you finish, select age 30 and send me the link to your result."
Agent IQ Time Limit spent Claude Cowork Opus 4.8 90 85m ~10 pts Claude Code Opus 4.8 90 96m ~28 pts Claude Sonnet 4.6 68 62m n/a Codex 5.5 $100 Fast 124 18m ~12 pts Codex 5.4 $100 Fast 101 16m ~14 pts Codex 5.5 $200 Fast 131 34m ~6 ptsThe score is only part of the story. Codex 5.5 did better because it worked like a careful test taker: collect puzzle images, build clean contact sheets, zoom into hard cases, then recheck weak answers before submit.
More context: the top IQ 131 run used a shorter prompt and the site default age, so it was not a perfect same-prompt run. Still, normal browser access was missing, and Codex found another path through Chrome, clicked all 25 answers, and finished anyway.Claude was careful, especially Opus. It wrote notes and reasoned step by step. Codex was more organized and faster. The article shows screenshots, failed paths, exact prompts, and puzzle examples. The most useful lesson: for visual web tasks, method can beat size. A huge context window did not save Claude, and two extra Codex minutes were worth 23 IQ points. read details on our website Please support this young channel by subscribing. Your subscription really helps us grow. There are no ads here.
The GigaChat team has released GigaChat 3.5 Ultra as open source—a new 432B model under the MIT license. This is the first open-source hybrid of GatedDeltaNet and MLA scaled to hundreds of billions of parameters, featuring a proprietary training recipe we refined through more than 1,500 experiments. The model has grown in terms of code, mathematics, agent scenarios, and application domains—yet it’s 40% smaller than GigaChat 3.1 Ultra.What’s inside: 🔘A proprietary hybrid MLA + Gated DeltaNet architecture with a dedicated stabilization framework, without which this hybrid setup would not train reliably at this scale; 🔘 Gated Attention: the model can locally down-weight overly strong signals from the attention layer; 🔘GatedNorm: normalization with an explicit gate that controls signal magnitude across features; 🔘Approximately 4x lower KV cache per token: with the same memory budget, the model can support 2.14x longer context and deliver a 20% throughput increase under load; 🔘Two MTP heads, enabling up to 2.2x faster generation; 🔘FP8 across all training stages with no quality degradation compared with bf16, enabled by custom Triton and CUDA kernels; 🔘A new online RL stage after SFT and DPO. Results: 🔘 GigaChat-3.5-Ultra-Base outperforms DeepSeek V3.2 Exp Base and DeepSeek V4 Flash Base on average across a set of general, math, and code benchmarks: 🔘 GigaChat-3.5-Ultra-Instruct is comparable to DeepSeek V3.2 in terms of average score, despite having half the size; 🔘 According to the MiniMax-M2.7 LLM judge, the average win rate against GigaChat 3.1 Ultra is 75.9%, and against GPT-5 is 68.7%.
The entire stack — data (our own LLM-filtered Common Crawl, 600+ programming languages in the code), architecture, training methodology, and infrastructure — was built end-to-end by GigaChat team.➡️ HuggingFace
