The Aryan Path (V2)

Nationalists have moved the Overton Window so far that our talking points are now being adopted by mainstream conservatives. Never underestimate what a small number of highly motivated individuals can achieve.

Natsocs will be the conservatives of the future. I’ll continue to sit in the radical camp, always pushing.

The RSL's (Australian Veterans clubs) have been turned into disgraceful slave taverns more interested in pokies and drug addicts, than honouring our Ancestors.

Our entire enemies worldview is built around destroying life at it's core. By definition it is a death force. Their hatred of all higher White Ideals such as; Honour, Strength, Beauty, Truth, all stem from from this death force. This is why they hate beautiful buildings and want to turn them ugly. They hate Strong men and want to turn them into weaklings. They hate pure women and want them to cut their hair and destroy their bodies. They hate the truth and want it outlawed as "hate". They want to turn the world upside down, and to defeat them we have to Create Life. We have to Create. Create Truth. Create Stregnth. Create Beauty. Create Honour. Create in White children. Create in White brotherhood. Create in White culture. Create in White institutions and organisations. Create in White power. This is the Life force.

"The Great Man… is colder, harder, less hesitating, and without fear of ‘opinion’; he lacks the virtues that accompany respect and ‘respectability,’ and altogether everything that is the 'virtue of the herd.’ If he cannot lead, he goes alone… He knows he is incommunicable: he finds it tasteless to be familiar… When not speaking to himself, he wears a mask. There is a solitude within him that is inaccessible to praise or blame." — Nietzsche, The Will to Power

There have been great men, some of you will even be great. There has not yet been a superman. Only great men can bring him forth, be great! -

The Natsoc world-view is fundamentally Nietzschean:

I think he is in many ways tbh, being superior to mankind. The point is perpetual striving upwards, beyond humanity, rather than an idealised healthy man as the goal. He’s a fictional character, that has many Nietzschean qualities. A perfect example of how an actual ubermensch would exist ‘beyond’ humanity. This isn’t to say he’s the perfect definition of Nietzsche’s doctrines, but he certainly comes closer than anyone in our age. Ultimately my point in the analogy is that the ubermensch exists beyond us, man is the bridge to him - the path, not the goal. The ubermensch has not yet existed, but he may.

The emperor in warhammer 40k is the sort of god-man ubermensch to strive for, not being a well-dressed fag. So many groups claim the ubermensch as if it’s a goal to attain now, and not a perpetual striving upwards to beings beyond ourselves.

The thing is though, this can be applied at a much larger scope than simply the personal. It can be spiritual. Really though I find all puritan types of moralising tedious, I’d prefer we simply strive for something far beyond man. That doesn’t mean fucking an ass though lol, it means creating progressively superior men. Applying this philosophy to a grander scope than simply satisfaction will lead to greater conclusions. Nietzsche is saying this yes, but he’s also suggesting it can be an all encompassing world-view. A spiritual quest for the real ascendance of man.

99% of those on the Right who claim themselves as Nietzschean - aren't. People think he is a nihilist - when really, his philosophy is a screed against nihilism. To overcome nihilism, man must create his own morals and, in so doing, become the Ubermensch. Man himself must be overcome. He seeks not a herd to follow his morals, but companions - who follow him, because they want to follow themselves. "Buddhism promises nothing, but actually fulfills; Christianity promises everything, but fulfills nothing." - Friedrich Nietzsche

True to a point, I’ve met a few brilliant Nietzscheans:

Morality is not a set of essential principles guiding man, but an instrument of co-existence between persons of common interest in a particular place for a period of time. There is nothing static about moral precepts because the world is dynamic. The theory of a categorical imperative which resides in the reason is false, like every other moral theory. When we hold it as fundamental principles of society, we see that society begins to decay and disintegrate. Morality has developed at the expense of well-constituted and beautiful natured men, those independent and privileged. Morality is an opposition movement against the efforts of nature to achieve a higher type. It upholds the weak to the decay of the strong. It is what Nietzsche calls “Slave Morality”. This act of sticking to an unchanging set of moral rules is a result of resentments by those unable to attain the inner status of a higher type man. Nietzsche says (attached) & retard rightoids thinks he's writing about invading a country or something