ar
Feedback
JACK♣️FELL

JACK♣️FELL

الذهاب إلى القناة على Telegram

إظهار المزيد
لم يتم تحديد البلدالفئة غير محددة
1 124
المشتركون
لا توجد بيانات24 ساعات
لا توجد بيانات7 أيام
لا توجد بيانات30 أيام
أرشيف المشاركات
judeo-communists would rather destroy Twitter than allow free speech on their platform.
judeo-communists would rather destroy Twitter than allow free speech on their platform.

Repost from Charlie Kirk
BREAKING: Twitter Board is enacting a tactic called a "Poison Pill" A poison pill is a defense tactic utilized by a target company to prevent or discourage hostile takeover attempts. Poison pills allow existing shareholders the right to purchase additional shares at a discount, effectively diluting the ownership interest of a new, hostile party. By discouraging a motivated buyer from buying more company stock, a shareholder rights plan is likely to leave a share price lower than it would be otherwise, at least in the short run. Poison pills can also shield entrenched and underperforming company managers from shareholder efforts to replace them. It's time for Elon Musk to initiate Plan B

Harry Anderson, Final day @IllustrationBoard
Harry Anderson, Final day @IllustrationBoard

Remember Waukesha. @TheDissidentRight.
Remember Waukesha. @TheDissidentRight.

Repost from McKrowComics
Less Gay Branding
Less Gay Branding

No matter how silly it is, you have been cast as the designated villain in a superhero movie. As such, you are always in the background playing puppet master to the crimes of the helpless people of color in your thrall, until the heroes confront you for the final confrontation where they give long-winded speeches justifying the system's righteousness as they save the day by beating you into oblivion. @jackfelldownagain http://dailykos.com/story/2022/4/13/2091801/-Brooklyn-subway-shooting-suspect-s-videos-reveal-a-Black-man-in-the-grip-of-far-right-extremism

The Desk of Jack McKraken (On Parole) The official home of Jack McKraken: author, dissident, and prison reformer. Find more at Antelope Hill Publishing. https://t.me/jack_mckraken_on_parole

Say what you will about the Elon Musk Twitter buyout saga. The mask is being ripped off in real time revealing what Twitter truly is and how important it is to entrenched power in the Judeo-Corporate Territories of Weimerica. @jackfelldownagain https://t.me/No_BS_NewS/48281

photo content

photo content

Practical Ideas for Self-Reliant Living Backwoods Home

9PM EST The People's Square - Subway Shooting with Hyphen Reports Jack McKraken and Ed Weston Striker discusses the NYC Subway Shooting and its fallout with author Jack McKraken and Hyphen Report correspondent Ed Weston. I will be going live on both Odysee and Youtube. https://odysee.com/@ThePeoplesSquare:9/TPSSubway:8 https://youtu.be/K9uqs8l1y8M

Repost from RealTimeNews™
Panic ensues at Elon Musk’s potential Twitter purchase. Why are they afraid of free speech? @dailyrealtimenews
+1
Panic ensues at Elon Musk’s potential Twitter purchase. Why are they afraid of free speech? @dailyrealtimenews

Repost from Bertie Bassett
This is really interesting. Musk is pulling on one piece of thread and revealing a lot: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1514683079968931841?s=20&t=nD0vQmQSeTDz33MyNGmEjQ

Another thought on the Musk-twitter saga - if the board refuse to sell to Musk at a price well above market value, could he sue the board of twitter as a shareholder for failing in its fiduciary responsibility to shareholder primacy? I don't know much about corporate law, but Dodge vs. Ford, 1919 shows that such a case wouldn't be without precedent in the US. There have been cases which found both for and against shareholder primacy in the century since. Nevertheless, as this essay points out, the status of shareholder primacy in American law is very real although complicated and ambigious. The cause and effect of shareholder primacy rests on a legal foundation, and not some general notion of collective social belief that perhaps can change with enough persuasion or argumentation.  The board therefore has to surely come up with a strictly financial case for why they're rejecting his bid, which it seems pretty clear they don't have. The question I have therefore is - if the Twitter board refuse to sell and Musk sues, would it go to SCOTUS? If it does, surely the conservative majority works in Musk's favour?

If Musk buys twitter and actually makes it a free speech platform, or even just allows right of center commenters back on without having to battle constant bans and timeouts, Jews will pull the trigger on repealing section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, so that Jews can just sue the shit out of twitter if anyone says anything on there they don't like.