Election Data Analyzer

Meanwhile in the US (unlike the above post), we do this....The NSF makes it SEEM more and more complicated and promotes the CTCL as a partner. https://vote-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/Election-Science-Proposed-NSF-Convergence-Accelerator.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAI4764GFDOFW6EPAQ&Signature=0qXIZoCiGR8uXl9e43zv5Xe7NoU%3D&Expires=1645366324

Meanwhile in France...In general, voting is done using paper and manual counting. The voter gets pre-printed ballot papers (bulletin) from a table at the entrance of the voting office (mail-in voting is not allowed in France[7]). There is one ballot paper for each candidate, pair of candidates (for departmental elections) or list. These ballot papers are also sent by mail to voters before the election. The voter then has their identity and registration checked by an official, after which the voter takes an envelope. If they also act as a proxy for another voter, they take a second envelope. The voter then enters a curtained booth (isoloir), where they are hidden from sight, and inserts the ballot paper of their candidate into the envelope. They walk to the ballot box, where the president of the voting office or their deputy formally checks their identity[8][9] (in conurbations with more than 5000 inhabitants, an identification document must be shown[10]). After the officials have acknowledged their right to vote, the ballot box is opened and the voter inserts the envelope. One of the officials, traditionally loudly, announces "A voté! (Has voted!)". This is purely ceremonial and has a double meaning: the voter's voix (voice) will be taken into account and they have accomplished their civic duty. The voter then signs the voters' list and their voter registration card is stamped.

Here is a flashback....when news organizations, even Liberal one's discussed the aging voting infrastructure. Wow, imagine being able to discuss it without being labelled a "wackadoodle". Let me summarize the article, the voting equipment purchased after the "hanging chad" fiasco in 2001 is outdated. So, we either double down on this cycle of using technology or Vote Amish. https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/02/14/386191861/around-the-u-s-voting-technology-is-all-over-the-place

Here is another example that also describes the history of voting on paper in this county. Hand counts existed into the 1960s. They also ditched the electronic touch screens for paper but, are still using the hackable Tabulator. https://www.cvilletomorrow.org/articles/paper-ballots-election

Here is an example of a locality ditching the touch screen voting for paper.....but, they are still using machine counts. https://www.baltimoresun.com/politics/bs-md-paper-ballots-20160204-story.html

Useful reference. https://pages.nist.gov/ElectionGlossary/#ballot

Remove these dots and we have secure elections again.

The Business of Voting: 1 billion is spent on election administration annually in the US and the election machine companies earn 300 million a year? What an outrage and a scam. We can make an argument to get rid of the machines just based on excessive cost and waste alone. Get rid of the machines. Fix 2020! https://trustthevote.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/2017-whartonoset_industryreport.pdf

We The People don’t want big business in our elections. We don’t need audits. We don’t need canvassing. We don’t need to prove anything to the politicians that work for us. Big business does not belong in elections. Low tech nonprofit all paper ballots just like our grandparents used. Is that so difficult? Based on the poll results above this crowd agrees.

Here is a perfect example of a think tank describing a problem, then solving it with more bureaucracy. They never even mention in this report getting rid of the machines as an option. Why? Just layer on more layers of certifications from the EAC? Good luck with coordinating that and maintaining it for 50 states. Vote Amish. Posted as an example of what NOT to do. https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/2019_10_ElectionVendors.pdf

Here is a very special subset of the "Whack-A-Mole-Party-Togglers" (otherwise know as WAMPTs). They all get "whacked" back into there mole hole twice between NOV20-AUG21. Try this at home.

Has anyone else seen this in your roll data? I updated the analysis a bit to account for people who are removed from the roll and then re-emerge later, sometimes with the same Party, sometimes with a different Party. The blank cells indicate that the voter dropped from the roll. Look at line 7. This person is a DEM in NOV20. Then they remove themselves from the roll and decide to add themselves back as REP in AUG 21. I suppose they saw how badly things were going with the current administration and decided to re-engage in politics? (Being generous here....) I'll refer to this new subset as the "Whack-A-Mole-Party Togglers". Try this at home.

This is a subset from a county of about 500,000. Look at these Party Togglers! We will find out soon with the canvass what is going on here. The team is organizing now....

Dr. Shiva brought up this organization in the above video, in case you are not aware. The NASED has corporate sponsors. https://www.nased.org/corporate-affiliates

Dr Shiva: "You have a choice. Become educated or remain enslaved." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk

According to Dr Shiva, machine count curve is on top, hand count is below. This was an election he was part of in MA. Basically, fair hand count elections should look like the bottom graph. I will post the entire video below.

Look at what those Patriots in FL have been up to. Boom! https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.salvo.app&hl=en_US&gl=US