ar
Feedback
Election Data Analyzer

Election Data Analyzer

قناة بسيطة

Without election integrity we do not have a nation.

إظهار المزيد
لم يتم تحديد البلدالفئة غير محددة
997
المشتركون
لا توجد بيانات24 ساعات
لا توجد بيانات7 أيام
لا توجد بيانات30 أيام
أرشيف المشاركات
"Homomorphic Cryptography" for internet voting coming to an election near you? https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/podcast/securing-the-vote-with-dr-josh-benaloh/

I came across this 501c recently. Election Verification Network (EVN) There seems to be no end to these organizations who perpetuate the status quo. The organizations includes the following (cabal) members. Microsoft Research OSET Institute Center for Internet Security Alliance for Security Democracy The Carter Center CISA Brennan Center for Justice Pima County CO Dept of State Nordic Innovation Labs Verified Voting Voting Works Common Cause “More than fifteen years ago, a small group of election-related professionals concerned with the integrity and improvement of U.S. voting systems considered the potential of a gathering place for leaders, experts and policy makers…one where they could exchange information, collaborate on ideas, share challenges and solutions, and serve as a trusted advisory resource for those responsible for local, statewide, and national elections. Out of that concept, the Election Verification Network (EVN) was born. Our mission includes two interwoven goals: to support and maintain voting that is accessible, private, reliable, and secure; and elections that are transparent, accurate, and verifiable.” https://electionverification.org/our-story/

Repost from GEORGENEWS
⚡️Big Guy confession time? "I bet everybody knows somebody somewhere along the line that in an intimate relationship, what happened was the guy takes a revealing picture of his naked friend, or whatever, in a compromising position and then...blackmails or mortifies that person." – Res. Biden ### https://t.me/georgenews | @GEORGENEWS

Did you ever think a POTUS would be saying such things?

Did you know the National Academy of Sciences has determined that voting is now sooooooooo complicated that there needs to be active research and publications in this area? I wonder if that would be the case if we transitioned to no machines and hand counting? https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25120/securing-the-vote-protecting-american-democracy

Arlo, developed by VotingWorks is being used in 8 states as a post-election RLA app. That includes GA, PA, MI and NV....interesting. https://www.voting.works/risk-limiting-audits

This organization is headed up by the Jim Marchant candidate for NV SoS. https://americafirstsos.com/

Is your state using ARLO to conduct risk limiting audits? This app was built by VotingWorks. https://fcw.com/security/2019/11/cisa-rolls-out-post-election-audit-tool-for-2020/238609/

Ready for the next generation of “secure’ electronic voting? Enter “Voting Works”. We promise it will work this time even though 100s of millions of tax payer dollars were wasted on the older technology. It costs less than the other machines. The catch, you still need a commercial PC and optical scanner at the precinct or central location. They claim it is designed and assembled in the USA….OK, what about where the parts are manufactured? https://docs.voting.works/vxsuite/

On my reading list. Perhaps we should buy in bulk and send them to our Board of Election officials? The more you dig, the mor
On my reading list. Perhaps we should buy in bulk and send them to our Board of Election officials? The more you dig, the more you realize, this failure in technology has been an open secret that has been talked and written about for years. Many of us are just waking up to it. Broken Ballots begins with a comprehensive history of the use of technology in elections, starting with mechanical voting machines in the 19th century. Many of the problems that emerged then continue to plague modern electronic voting machines. The authors go on to illustrate how both legislation and the regulatory structure governing voting equipment have been ineffective at addressing technological risks – risks that frequently outstrip the understanding of election administrators and regulators. The result has been a series of failures where there is reason to doubt the official vote count correctly reflected the intent of the voters. Both Democrats and Republicans have been the victims of these failures. The book ends with a prescr

A liberal computer scientist that prefers paper voting from 2017. “Paper, Simons said, is the best answer to this riddle. Marked clearly and correctly, it’s a portable and transparent record of voter intent, one that voters themselves can verify, at least while the ballot is still in their possession. It’s also a permanent record, unlike computer memory, which can always be overwritten. “There’s no malware that can attack paper,” Simons said. “We can solve this. We know how to do it.” https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/12/guardian-of-the-vote/544155/

NO RUNBECK WE CANNOT TRUST RUNBECK Runbeck has a huge amount of unilateral power to control elections and Runbeck is partnered with Dominion voting systems. When a mail in ballot is sent out by Runbeck and returned to sender, the ballot in many cases finds itself back to Runbeck. Ballot harvesters could get legitimate and unused ballots directly from Runbeck. America was founded on checks and balances. Where are the checks and balances for mail in ballots? The only people who should be mailing in ballots are absentees who have a justified reason. Mass mail in ballots have too much risk for fraud, as we saw in our last election. I am totally opposed to Yavapai county extending any contract with Runbeck. Everybody wants fair elections that we can trust. We cannot trust Runbeck to run a fair election. Nobody can. — You can donate to my campaign here: https://helpwatkinswin.com/donations Every dollar helps me hold Runbeck and Dominion accountable. Thank you and God bless.

Regardless of what you think of Ron, he makes a great point that is not often discussed.

Here is a short list for your normy friends or lected reps from 2019 when it was acceptable to speak about machines in a negative way by CNN, BBC, Wash Post, Politico, NPR, Big Tech, The Gaurdian, Sen Wyden, Sen Warren et all….. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/26/politics/hackers-voting-machines/index.html https://www.engadget.com/2019-08-08-key-u-s-election-systems-could-have-been-exposed-online.html https://www.jconline.com/story/news/2019/11/05/faulty-machines-again-blamed-switching-votes-greater-lafayette-races/4163625002/ https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-46987319 https://www.engadget.com/2019-09-27-us-voting-machines-hackers-2020-election.html https://gcn.com/cybersecurity/2019/03/aging-voting-machines-risk-election-security/297996/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/08/12/def-con-hackers-lawmakers-came-together-tackle-holes-election-security/ https://www.politico.com/interactives/2019/election-security-americas-voting-machines/ https://www.npr.org/2019/08/31/754412132/what-you-need-to-know-about-u-s-election-security-and-voting-machines https://www.npr.org/2019/08/15/751419405/judge-denies-request-to-scrap-georgias-outdated-electronic-voting-machines-for-2 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/nov/19/georgia-new-voting-machines-critics-under-investigation https://www.westernjournal.com/revealed-klobuchar-warren-sent-letter-warning-dominion-election-tech-2019/ https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/online-vulnerable-experts-find-nearly-three-dozen-u-s-voting-n1112436 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/all/chinese-parts-hidden-ownership-growing-scrutiny-inside-america-s-biggest-n1104516 https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/evm-machine-tampering-hacking-election-commission-electronic-voting-machines-5741250/ https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/26/politics/hackers-voting-machines/index.html https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/22/us-voting-machines-paper-ballots-2020-hacking https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/14/wyden-voting-machine-election-security-1221639 https://www.westernjournal.com/flashback-democrats-said-voting-machines-can-hacked-votes-can-switched/