Startups & Ventures
A hub for startup news, trends, and insights, covering the global startup ecosystem for founders, investors, and innovators. Community: @startupdis Buy Ads: @strategy (this is our only account).
إظهار المزيد📈 نظرة تحليلية على قناة تيليجرام Startups & Ventures
تُعد قناة Startups & Ventures (@tech) في القطاع اللغوي الإنكليزية لاعباً نشطاً. يضم المجتمع حالياً 2 740 495 مشتركاً، محتلاً المرتبة 22 في فئة التكنولوجيات والتطبيقات والمرتبة 48 في منطقة دولي.
📊 مؤشرات الجمهور والحراك
منذ تأسيسه في невідомо، حقق المشروع نمواً سريعاً وجمع 2 740 495 مشتركاً.
بحسب آخر البيانات بتاريخ 19 يونيو, 2026، تحافظ القناة على نشاط مستقر. خلال آخر 30 يوماً تغيّر عدد الأعضاء بمقدار -164 092، وفي آخر 24 ساعة بمقدار -4 805، مع بقاء الوصول العام مرتفعاً.
- حالة التحقق: موثّقة (مؤكدة رسمياً من تيليجرام)
- معدل التفاعل (ER): يبلغ متوسط تفاعل الجمهور 0.20%. وخلال أول 24 ساعة من النشر يحصد المحتوى عادةً 0.12% من ردود الفعل نسبةً إلى إجمالي المشتركين.
- وصول المنشورات: يحصل كل منشور على متوسط 5 493 مشاهدة. وخلال اليوم الأول يجمع عادةً 3 292 مشاهدة.
- التفاعلات والاستجابة: يتفاعل الجمهور بانتظام؛ متوسط التفاعلات لكل منشور يبلغ 510.
- الاهتمامات الموضوعية: يركز المحتوى على مواضيع رئيسية مثل claude, openai, gemini, insider, developer.
📝 الوصف وسياسة المحتوى
يصف المؤلف القناة بأنها مساحة للتعبير عن الآراء الذاتية:
“A hub for startup news, trends, and insights, covering the global startup ecosystem for founders, investors, and innovators.
Community: @startupdis
Buy Ads: @strategy (this is our only account).”
بفضل وتيرة التحديث المرتفعة (أحدث البيانات بتاريخ 20 يونيو, 2026) تحافظ القناة على حداثتها ومستوى وصول مرتفع. وتُظهر التحليلات تفاعلاً نشطاً من الجمهور، ما يجعلها نقطة تأثير مهمة ضمن فئة التكنولوجيات والتطبيقات.
OpenAI moves fast, breaks things, and keeps secrets. Not for everyone — but a dream for builders who like chaos.
No more digging through notes or docs. Just drop your prompt into the database and it’s there when you need it.🛠 Try it here
Who’s doing better? Or more importantly — which setup would you choose?Explain your thinking in the comments 👇 (Hint: it’s not as obvious as it looks.)
In April 2024, 44% of queries were about software development.Now, people are asking more about themselves.
Big companies are already building automation pipelines. SMEs that don’t catch up soon could lose their edge entirely.
You learned "kilo" from kilometers. Now meet "peta" — the new speed benchmark for the digital era.
Use cases? State surveillance. Authorities plan to deploy the cyborg bees for monitoring, eavesdropping, and intelligence gathering.Nature meets control tech.
Maor Shlomo may not have built the first solo unicorn — but he might’ve shown us exactly how it starts.
The AI race isn’t just about model size — it’s about who trains faster, ships smarter, and earns trust first.
Coming soon: sessions from the founders of Perplexity, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind’s John Jumper.📌 Save this post — it’s packed with signal.
RealSense says it’s building for a future where robots don’t replace humans — they protect and empower them.🧠 Physical AI is coming fast. RealSense wants to be the lens it sees through.
The problem is obvious — we’ve lived it ourselves.Okay. But as an investor, I might not even know this problem exists. Saying “parents hate carrying car seats” sounds like "trust me, bro". I need proof this is a pain worth paying for. Here are the strongest ways to validate a problem early: 1️⃣ Money Show a screenshot:
In one week, we got X payments from Y customers.Even if it’s small transfers to a personal card — when someone opens their wallet, they’re voting with actions, not words. 2️⃣LOIs (Letters of Intent) A document from a real company saying:
We’re ready to buy, if the product meets these terms.Not a contract, but serious signal. Shows you’ve talked to actual buyers, not just “the market.” 3️⃣ Paid pilots / test sales Built a prototype — and someone paid for it? Perfect. Even 10% of final price counts. Especially valuable in DeepTech or hardware: early preorders, even scrappy ones, are a green flag. What doesn’t count as real validation: – “Friends said the idea is cool” – “European fleets are interested, but haven’t paid” – “People gave great feedback at our demo” – “Survey says 87% would buy it” Nice signals — but not validation. Validation is when people pay you to solve a real problem. The best way to prove a problem exists? Try selling the solution. If they buy — great, you hit a nerve. If they dodge — that’s useful too. Better to find out before the pitch. What validation worked best for you? What convinced your investors? Share in the comments.
It’s not just faster — it thinks better.🔥Best-in-class at coding, math, and reasoning 🔥10× smarter than Grok 3 at analytical tasks 🔥Reliably predicts sports outcomes just by scanning Polymarket 🔥Runs business ops 6× more efficiently than humans 🔥Surpasses PhD-level in every domain — even invents new physics 🔥Uses tools (browser, code interpreter) more intelligently 🔥In voice: can whisper, sing, modulate tone — and respond faster than GPT 🔥Scores 44.4% on the “Final Human Exam” — AGI is knocking Grok 4 is rolling out now — see it live.
متاح الآن! بحث تيليغرام 2025 — أهم رؤى العام 
