ℭ𝔲𝔩𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰𝔪〘 𝔸𝕟𝕥𝕚 ℂ𝕒𝕥𝕙𝕠𝕝𝕚𝕔𝕚𝕤𝕞 〙

ℭ𝔳𝔠𝔨𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰𝔪 , ℭ𝔲𝔩𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰𝔪

Cultholic Christ is actually Lucifer ℭ𝔳𝔠𝔨𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰𝔪 , ℭ𝔲𝔩𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰𝔪

We wuz ✊🏿 ℭ𝔳𝔠𝔨𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰𝔪 , ℭ𝔲𝔩𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰𝔪

Famous Photograph of Nikola Tesla Reading the Work of a Jesuit Priest In this famous photograph, American inventor and electrical engineer, Nikola Tesla is seen reading Roger Boskovich’s book Theoria Philosophiae Naturalis. This fact has been documented numerous times in scientific literature and various journalistic articles. However, they all seem to leave one convenient detail out, that being that Roger Boskovich was a Jesuit Priest! 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕

The Diabolical Chameleon-like Nature of the Jesuits “The Americans… are beginning to learn that Jesuitism is the same unchanging principle of intrigue and evil in Republics, which it has proved itself for ages to be under Monarchies. To the Jesuit, all forms of government are alike; he is literally all things to all men; he cares not who wears the livery of power, if he himself holds the reins of empire. In Russia, he is, at most, only a devout Catholic—oftener, and apparently, a sincere worshipper of the Greek Church. ‘Draw the character after what the Jesuit seems to be in London, and you will not recognise your portrait in the Jesuit of Rome. The Jesuit is the man of circumstances; despotic in Spain, constitutional in England, republican in Paraguay, bigot in Rome, idolater in India, he acts out— in his own person, with admirable flexibility, all those features by which men are usually to be distinguished from each other. He will accompany the gay women of the world to the theatre, and will share in the excesses of the debauchee. With solemn countenance he will take his place by the side of the religious man at church; and he will revel in the tavern with the glutton and the sot. He dresses in all garbs; speaks all languages; knows all customs; is present everywhere—though nowhere recognised; and all this should seem [oh, monstrous blasphemy!] for the greater glory of God—ad majorem Dei gloriam.¹’ The Jesuit always sides with power; for he always seeks it favour. When he changes parties, it is only to prostrate those whom he cannot make his instruments, and elevate those whom he can… He is a Whig in one state, and a Democrat in another. He is a Secessionist and a Slavery Propagandist at the South of America, and an Abolitionist at the North. He concedes to you, or to me, all things except power.” -Stanhope Burleigh, or, The Jesuits in our homes, by Helen Dhu pages vi-vii ¹Quoting from G.B. Nicolini’s work The History of the Jesuits: Their Origin, Progress, Doctrines, and Designs. Source 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕

The Bible debunks the Shroud of Turin and Shroud of Oviedo as forgeries; because the Shroud is laid with the linen clothes and napkin combined altogether, but the KJB says Jesus' linen clothes were not laid with the napkin about his head and were laid by themselves [which means Jesus' napkin for his head & his linen clothes were seperate, not like the Shroud of Turin that combines the linen clothes & head napkin together, thus debunking the Shroud of Turin and exposing it as a fraud) Luke 24:12 KJB [12] Then arose Peter, and ran unto the sepulchre; and stooping down, he beheld the linen clothes laid by themselves, and departed, wondering in himself at that which was come to pass. John 20:5-7 KJB [5] And he stooping down, and looking in, saw the linen clothes lying; yet went he not in. [6] Then cometh Simon Peter following him, and went into the sepulchre, and seeth the linen clothes lie, [7] and the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself. On the supposed 2nd Shroud called "Shroud of Oviedo", the Bible does not say 2 sets of linen clothes or shrouds; it says Simon Peter saw the linen clothes lie and the napkin wrapped together by itself . Not 2 shrouds and 2 napkins. Therefore, that Shroud of Oviedo is fake nonsense. John 20:5-7 KJB [5] And he stooping down, and looking in, saw the linen clothes lying; yet went he not in. [6] Then cometh Simon Peter following him, and went into the sepulchre, and seeth the linen clothes lie, [7] and the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself. God doesn't want us to worship images, then why would he leave us with an image of himself that the Catholics are going to worship the heck out of? Soffi Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: (Exodus 20:4 KJB). ℭ𝔳𝔠𝔨𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰𝔪 & ℭ𝔲𝔩𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔩𝔦𝔠𝔦𝔰𝔪

Take a guess BEAST OF REVELATION