Alec Cave

Liberal-progressives are trying to cow us into an empathy trap using the family of Henry Nowak so that we do not talk about serious issues harming our nation like mass immigration, multi-culturalism and institutional anti-white racism. They'll exploit any tool at their disposal to stop their ideology being questioned, including grieving families.

Saint George’s flag is a symbol of our shared English identity. It belongs to us, not to those who would twist it to undermine the roots of our nation. We will stand by it. Happy Saint George's Day! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

The Southport massacre would have been prevented if consecutive governments hadn't imposed mass immigration onto us. Our nation's children continue to be raped and murdered as a direct result of their destructive policy. The only way to prevent further horrors is to restrict naturalisation and facilitate remigration.

Ancestry is a component of ethnicity. One either has an ancestral tie to a nation or one does not. No amount of adoption of a host nation's culture can change that. This is not a value judgement, simply a statement of reality.

What Ben Habib fails to understand is that reawakened ethnic consciousness among the indigenous British - English, Scottish, Welsh - is not a threat to the union. The demand for self-determination does not necessarily lead to separatism. Self-determination means that a people have the right to choose whether they are in a political union or not. If anything, the rekindling of our organic identities in the face of mass immigration may well bring us closer together. What is a threat to the union is if it is perceived by people to be an obstacle to reversing their demographic demise in their homeland. If unionists condemn the inevitable resurgence of ethnic consciousness, especially among the English, it is in fact they who jeopardise the union. They need to be conscientious of this.

Whilst law-abiding Brits are taxed at every turn, illegal migrants are rewarded with £10,000 of our money for violating our borders.

Diversity from mass immigration leads to conflict and division. Do not let the left divide us. Oppose mass immigration for a more peaceful, purposeful and prosperous future for our people.

To say Britain is being colonised is not 'inflammatory language', it is objective.

My reaction everytime I read 'if we don't win the election in 2029 this country is finished'.

Let me make this very clear. Remigration is not simply the mass deportation of illegal immigrants. It is a policy agenda which seeks to facilitate the mass emigration of foreigners who have no ties to our nation from our homeland back to theirs.

The foreigners have got to go.

Join me and Daniel Gale tonight, as we discuss the recent controversies around Reform's Laila Cunningham and Nadhim Zahawi. https://x.com/i/spaces/1BdGYZYkDOgJX?s=20

Join me and Daniel Gale tonight, as we discuss the recent controversies around Reform's Laila Cunningham and Nadhim Zahawi.

Why is it now an increasing occurrence to see police armed with submachine guns in our country?

Multiculturalism compels us to adapt and to accommodate minority foreign cultures in our own homeland. No more appeasement out of fear and guilt. We will assert our identity and cultural norms in our homeland again.

Step 1: Close the borders. Step 2: Remigration.

The only reason the term 'ethnonationalism' exists is because of ideological outgrowths (distortions) of nationalism like Christian, civic and racial have emerged in recent centuries. Authentic nationalism doesn't need the 'ethno' modifier. Nation and ethnicity have historically and universally been synonymous.

To place faith either above or equal to ethnicity to qualify someone as belonging to a nation is to be just as much of an inclusive progressive liberal as an advocate of multiculturalism. Both are aberrations rejecting the general historical conception of what determines whether someone belongs to a nation - ethnicity. Language, culture, history and ancestry are particular to ethnic groups. The Christian religion is universal and not exclusively practiced by any one ethnic group. A nation may have a religion practised by the majority of its members, but it has little bearing on whether they belong to that nation. General knowledge among our people of our nation's religious history is valuable. But it must be accepted that nations organically adopt, drop and change religions over time. Denial doesn't change the fact that nations evolve. Evolution is neither good nor bad - it is just a part of nature. But in the interests of social harmony, social change ought to be organic and gradual. Vast and rapid change guided by progressive denials of human nature or religious dogmatism inflict harm and discord. Adherence to a specific religion as a prerequisite to belonging to the English nation is not historically accurate and proponents who say it now should be are motivated by religious zealotry.

I hope you're all having a wonderful Christmas day. 🎄

Happy solstice!