ar
Feedback

لا تقع ضحية للمخادعين! تيليمتريو يكتشف ويُميّز هذه القنوات 👉 إذا كنت تريد رؤية العلامة، اشترك

Existential Comics

Existential Comics

الذهاب إلى القناة على Telegram

Unofficial fan channel for Existential Comics official website existentialcomics.com I'm NOT the author of the webcomic, I just forward it on telegram

إظهار المزيد
Buy Ad
1 917
المشتركون
-124 ساعات
-37 أيام
+230 أيام
أرشيف المشاركات
"Okay fine, I agree, it is not yet proven false that Einstein would have had a catch with me whenever I wanted."

photo content

photo content

"Please...no! No more examples of teaching primitive language games, I give up, I'll tell you anything!"

photo content

A lot of the critiques of Utilitarianism, the doctrine that we should try to create a world that maximizes happiness, point out the bizarre and inhuman actions that we would seemingly have to accept if we accepted the theory. For example, we can imagine that if we wanted to maximize happiness, it would be morally justified, and perhaps even required, to murder a healthy person and harvest their organs in order to save five people. After all, five lives are more valuable than one, so even if it doesn't seem like justice, we should kill one person to save the five. However, as the comic points out, you don't even need to get five people involved. It seems as though a single happy person is intrinsically "worth" more than a sad one, so we should even kill one person who is sad to save one that is happy. All in all, utilitarianism usually sounds great when people first hear about it, and the theory really only suffers from one minor flaw - no one wants to live in a world where we actually believe it is true.

A lot of the critiques of Utilitarianism, the doctrine that we should try to create a world that maximizes happiness, point out the bizarre and inhuman actions that we would seemingly have to accept if we accepted the theory. For example, we can imagine that if we wanted to maximize happiness, it would be morally justified, and perhaps even required, to murder and healthy person and harvest their organs in order to save five people. After all, five lives are more valuable than one, so even if it doesn't seem like justice, we should kill one person to save the five. However, as the comic points out, you don't even need to get five people involved. It seems as though a single happy person is intrinsically "worth" more than a sad one, so we should even kill one person who is sad to save one that is happy. All in all, utilitarianism usually sounds great when people first hear about it, and the theory really only suffers from one minor flaw - no one wants to live in a world where we actually believe it is true.

What if being a Utilitarian makes you sad? We should probably kill all the Utilitarians just to be safe.

photo content

photo content

"Imagine, the universe is going to recur eternally over and over again, and you will somehow never get any less stupid."

photo content

photo content

Serious historical question though, no joke: did Hegel have groupies?

photo content