SHINY CORP

IKEA Data Breaches 1. IKEA Canada — 95,000+ Customers Information involved: - Full names - Email addresses - Phone numbers - Postal codes - Potential IKEA Family membership numbers Approximately 95,000 customers were reportedly affected. 2. IKEA Norway — 42,370 Customers and 3,000+ Employees Information involved: - Full names - Residential addresses - Email addresses - Phone numbers - Age and gender - Other personal and employee-related information Reports indicated that approximately 42,370 customers and more than 3,000 employees may have been affected. 3. Ingka Group (Global IKEA) — 180 GB+ Information reportedly involved: - Internal source-code repositories - E-commerce architecture - Cloud infrastructure details - Supply chain systems - Internal AI projects - Other confidential corporate information A hacking group reportedly claimed to possess more than 180 GB of IKEA-related internal data. The full scope of the alleged breach has not been independently verified. 4. IKEA Salesforce Incident — 3 TB+ / 13 GB Information reportedly involved: - Approximately 14 million records, according to the attackers' claims - Customer-related information - Potentially other CRM-related data The exact types of exposed information and the number of unique customers affected have not been conclusively established. The reported data volumes of 3 TB and 13 GB require further verification and should not be treated as confirmed figures for the same incident. Other companies reportedly associated with Salesforce-related security incidents include Google, Disney, Marriott, FedEx, and Adidas. However, this does not necessarily mean that all these companies suffered the same type of breach or that their customer data was confirmed stolen. Price is negotiable Signature: @reyswap PGP: https://pastebin.com/J0pwFRLq Official Contact Email: shinyprocorp@proton.me Session ID:

0501da0be27ccac7d4cec7ca1a84e946e3c7dfa9c4da49552b5f32d69980596d7b

How to download it here Download it at https://getsession.org/download

Salesforce API access token at IKEA.com 3TB Price: $150k Signature: @reyswap PGP: https://pastebin.com/J0pwFRLq Official Contact Email: shinyprocorp@proton.me Session ID:

0501da0be27ccac7d4cec7ca1a84e946e3c7dfa9c4da49552b5f32d69980596d7b

How to download it here Download it at https://getsession.org/download

Turkey baydoner.com - Iskander Enthusiasts Restaurant Customers 1.3M / 2026 Compromised Data Dates of birth Email addresses Genders Geographic locations Government issued IDs Names Passwords Phone numbers Purchases Download: https://anonfilesnew.com/Csq37zQeCAn/1.3M-Turkey-baydoner.com-Iskander-Enthusiasts-Restaurant-(Customers+Orders)-csv-2026.zip

Listen friends our official contact is only this, And Rey will be released soon, don't worry! Time flies and passes. Signature: @reyswap PGP: https://pastebin.com/J0pwFRLq Official Contact Email: shinyprocorp@proton.me Session ID:

0501da0be27ccac7d4cec7ca1a84e946e3c7dfa9c4da49552b5f32d69980596d7b

How to download it here Download it at https://getsession.org/download

VIP pay $10,000 anyone who wants to enter contact us: https://t.me/+07Fg3BEqcb9kMDk1 OFFICIAL CONTACT & PGP SIGNATURE PUBLIC Signature: @reyswap PGP: https://pastebin.com/J0pwFRLq Official Contact Email: shinyprocorp@proton.me Session ID:

0501da0be27ccac7d4cec7ca1a84e946e3c7dfa9c4da49552b5f32d69980596d7b

How to download it here Download it at https://getsession.org/download

Hi

There are 4 days left after that everything will be public and believe me when it is public it will be useless anymore!

SH: https://t.me/+jWmOZbzj7xpjNjM9 Group: https://t.me/+iKCnoUQyHQA0ODNl

SH: https://t.me/+jWmOZbzj7xpjNjM9 Group: https://t.me/+iKCnoUQyHQA0ODNl

We will prioritize proportionate communication and constructive resolution. If this matter cannot be resolved appropriately, we will consider further steps through the available channels, while continuing to prioritize evidence, applicable procedures, and due diligence. Any action we take will be measured and responsible, not motivated by intimidation, retaliation, or personal hostility. To members of the public who have read or shared the relevant posts, we urge you not to immediately draw conclusions, pass judgment, or further circulate information whose accuracy remains in dispute. We appreciate everyone who is willing to examine sources, compare information, and allow room for clarification before forming an opinion. We believe that the truth should be established through facts, not determined by how loudly an allegation is repeated or how widely a post is shared. No individual, organization, or community should have its reputation undermined by information that has not been properly verified. Every issue deserves to be considered in its proper context and assessed fairly, without prejudice or the distortion of facts. Ultimately, we stand firmly by the principle that facts must come first, information must be accountable, and reputations must not be sacrificed because of inaccurate reporting. We are not demanding special treatment. We are simply demanding fairness, a reasonable opportunity to explain our position, and accountability for information presented to the public. We expect DailyDarkweb to take this statement seriously and respond in a professional manner. We hope that this matter can be addressed through open clarification and a transparent examination of the facts. We also urge all parties to refrain from speculation and avoid escalating the situation by spreading additional claims that lack a clear and credible factual basis. We issue this statement as our official position, as a defense of our reputation, and as a clear declaration that we will not remain silent if inaccurate information continues to circulate and cause harm. We will remain firm without abandoning professionalism, express our objections without engaging in personal attacks, and defend the truth through means that are responsible and accountable. We call for the facts to be prioritized, inaccurate information to be corrected, and our right to provide clarification to be respected. Our reputation is not a subject for baseless speculation. The truth is not merely a narrative. And accountability for information shared with the public is an obligation that must never be ignored. This concludes our official statement. We sincerely hope that this matter will be addressed responsibly, fairly, and on the basis of facts that can be independently verified. SINCERELY, SHINYHUNTERS - SH

We will prioritize proportionate communication and constructive resolution. If this matter cannot be resolved appropriately, we will consider further steps through the available channels, while continuing to prioritize evidence, applicable procedures, and due diligence. Any action we take will be measured and responsible, not motivated by intimidation, retaliation, or personal hostility. To members of the public who have read or shared the relevant posts, we urge you not to immediately draw conclusions, pass judgment, or further circulate information whose accuracy remains in dispute. We appreciate everyone who is willing to examine sources, compare information, and allow room for clarification before forming an opinion. We believe that the truth should be established through facts, not determined by how loudly an allegation is repeated or how widely a post is shared. No individual, organization, or community should have its reputation undermined by information that has not been properly verified. Every issue deserves to be considered in its proper context and assessed fairly, without prejudice or the distortion of facts. Ultimately, we stand firmly by the principle that facts must come first, information must be accountable, and reputations must not be sacrificed because of inaccurate reporting. We are not demanding special treatment. We are simply demanding fairness, a reasonable opportunity to explain our position, and accountability for information presented to the public. We expect DailyDarkweb to take this statement seriously and respond in a professional manner. We hope that this matter can be addressed through open clarification and a transparent examination of the facts. We also urge all parties to refrain from speculation and avoid escalating the situation by spreading additional claims that lack a clear and credible factual basis. We issue this statement as our official position, as a defense of our reputation, and as a clear declaration that we will not remain silent if inaccurate information continues to circulate and cause harm. We will remain firm without abandoning professionalism, express our objections without engaging in personal attacks, and defend the truth through means that are responsible and accountable. We call for the facts to be prioritized, inaccurate information to be corrected, and our right to provide clarification to be respected. Our reputation is not a subject for baseless speculation. The truth is not merely a narrative. And accountability for information shared with the public is an obligation that must never be ignored. This concludes our official statement. We sincerely hope that this matter will be addressed responsibly, fairly, and on the basis of facts that can be independently verified. SINCERELY, SHINYHUNTERS Official Statement Regarding Clarification and the Protection of Our Reputation.

We also request that unverified claims no longer be recirculated or presented as though they were established facts. Responsibility for published information does not end when a post goes live. When an error is identified, the responsibility to correct it must be taken just as seriously as the decision to publish it in the first place. We have no intention of creating unnecessary conflict, personally attacking any party, or engaging in endless public disputes. Our objective is straightforward: to correct inaccurate information, protect our reputation, and ensure that the public has a fair opportunity to assess this matter based on the facts as they actually stand. However, our calm and professional approach must not be interpreted as acceptance of the information we dispute. We have the right to raise objections, issue clarifications, request corrections, and consider appropriate further action when there are sufficient grounds to believe that our rights and interests have been harmed.

OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND STRONG DENIAL REGARDING DAILYDARKWEB POSTS THAT HARM OUR REPUTATION We hereby issue this official statement to express our serious objection and firm denial of the posts published by DailyDarkweb containing information about us that we consider false, misleading, and potentially damaging to our reputation in the eyes of the public. We believe that the dissemination of information to the public must be accompanied by responsibility, accuracy, and respect for the facts. Anyone who publishes information, particularly information concerning the reputation, identity, and credibility of another individual, organization, or community, should first ensure that the information is accurate and supported by reliable evidence before distributing it widely. We strongly reject any form of reporting that is not based on verifiable facts. If the information published by DailyDarkweb lacks credible supporting evidence, has not undergone proper verification, or presents an issue incompletely in a way that leads to misleading conclusions, we consider this a serious matter that should not be taken lightly. We want to make it clear that reputation and good standing are not things to be carelessly exploited for public attention, popularity, or any particular interest. Behind every name, organization, community, or individual targeted by public reporting is a reputation built through time, effort, and commitment. Therefore, the dissemination of inaccurate information can have real consequences, ranging from misunderstandings and loss of public trust to social and professional harm. We deeply regret any situation in which a platform chooses to publish information about us without providing a reasonable opportunity for clarification, presenting a clear factual basis, or conducting a fair and balanced review. Responsible reporting should not focus solely on how quickly information can spread, but also on how accurate that information is and how significantly it may affect the parties concerned. We are not asking anyone to believe us blindly. Instead, we encourage the public to think critically, avoid rushing to conclusions, and refrain from treating a single post as the sole basis for judging any individual, organization, or community. Every allegation should be assessed according to evidence, context, and facts that can be objectively examined, rather than assumptions, speculation, or narratives that may intentionally or unintentionally mislead readers. We also wish to emphasize that this statement is not an expression of fear toward criticism. We understand that criticism, questions, and public scrutiny are legitimate parts of an open society. However, constructive criticism is fundamentally different from the dissemination of inaccurate information. Responsible criticism is supported by a clear factual basis, whereas unverified allegations can harm others without giving them a fair opportunity to explain the actual circumstances. We remain open to questions raised in good faith, objective fact-checking, and clarification processes conducted professionally. However, our willingness to engage does not mean that we must automatically accept every allegation directed at us, particularly when such allegations are not accompanied by evidence that can be independently verified and reasonably substantiated. Through this statement, we formally request that DailyDarkweb provide the factual basis for the information it has published about us, conduct a comprehensive review of the relevant content, and provide us with a fair opportunity to present our clarification. If the published information is found to be false or misleading, we request that the relevant party promptly issue a public correction, remove or amend the inaccurate portions as appropriate based on the findings of the review, and provide a clarification proportionate to the reach and impact of the original publication.

Hi